The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature in School Science Education: How Science Learning Can Help Raise Environmental Awareness

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2015.68077   PDF   HTML   XML   3,087 Downloads   4,085 Views   Citations


This paper focuses upon the problem of raising environmental awareness in the context of school science education through an aesthetic appreciation of natural phenomena. In distinguishing between school learning and what could be called “conscious learning”, the paper explores the role that such an aesthetic appreciation of nature, and more specifically of natural entities, such as trees, laves, water drops, crystals, and phenomena, such as, flashes of lightning, aurora borealis, the water cycle, volcanic eruptions and stellar explosions, can be an integral part of science teaching, which, in turn, can help raise in students environmental awareness.

Share and Cite:

Hadzigeorgiou, Y. , Kampouropoulou, M. and Fokiali, P. (2015) The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature in School Science Education: How Science Learning Can Help Raise Environmental Awareness. Creative Education, 6, 745-752. doi: 10.4236/ce.2015.68077.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Bechtel, R., & Churchman, A. (Eds.) (2002). Handbook of Environmental Psychology. New York: Wiley & Sons.
[2] Blum, L. (1994). Moral Perception and Particularity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[3] Bohm, D. (1998). On Creativity. London: Routledge.
[4] Bossi, M., & Poggii, S. (Eds.) (1994). Romanticism in Science. Science in Europe, 1790-1840. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
[5] Brady, E. (2009). Environmental Aesthetics. In J. Callicott, & R. Frodeman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy. Vol. 1 (pp. 313-321). Detroit, MI: Macmillan Reference USA.
[6] Burke, E. (1990). A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas. New York: Oxford University Press.
[7] Carlson, A. (2010). Contemporary Environmental Aesthetics and the Requirements of Environmentalism. Environmental Values, 19, 298-314.
[8] Dewey, J. (1934). Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books.
[9] Dolan, T., Nichols, B., & Zeidler, D. (2009). Using Socio-Scientific Issues in Primary Classrooms. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21, 1-12.
[10] Doll, W. (1993). A Post-Modern Perspective on Curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
[11] Fisher, P. (1999). Wonder, the Rainbow, and the Aesthetics of Rare Experiences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[12] Greene, M. (1978). Landscapes of Learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
[13] Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2005). Romantic Understanding and Science Education. Teaching Education, 16, 23-32.
[14] Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2012). Fostering a Sense of Wonder in the Science Classroom. Research in Science Education, 42, 985-1005.
[15] Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2014). Reclaiming the Value of Wonder in Science Education. In K. Egan, A. Cant, & G. Judson (Eds.), “Wonder-Full Education”: The Centrality of Wonder in Teaching and Learning across the Curriculum (pp. 60-84). New York and London: Routledge.
[16] Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Garganourakis, V. (2010). Using Nikola Tesla’s Story and His Experiments as Presented in the Film “The Prestige” to Promote Scientific Inquiry: A Report of an Action Research Project. Interchange, 41, 363-378.
[17] Hadzigeorgiou, Y., Fokiali, P., & Kampouropoulou, M. (2012). Thinking about Creativity in Science Education. Creative Education, 3, 603-611.
[18] Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Skoumios, M. (2013). The Development of Environmental Awareness through School Science: Problems and Possibilities. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8, 405-426.
[19] Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Schulz, R. (2014). Romanticism and Romantic Science: Their Contribution to Science Education. Science & Education, 23, 1963-2006.
[20] Irvin, S. (2008). The Pervasiveness of the Aesthetic in Everyday Experience. British Journal of Aesthetics, 48, 29-44.
[21] Jardine, D., Clifford, P., & Friesen, S. (2003). Back to the Basics of Teaching and Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[22] Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[23] Korpela, K. (2002). Children’s Environment. In R. Bechtel, & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (pp. 363-373). New York: Wiley & Sons.
[24] Littledyke, M. (1996). Science Education for Environmental Awareness in a Postmodern World. Environmental Education Research, 2, 197-214.
[25] Littledyke, M. (2008). Science Education for Environmental Awareness: Approaches to Integrating Cognitive and Affective Domains. Environmental Education Research, 14, 1-7.
[26] Lemley, B. (1999). Do You See What They See? Discover, 20, 80-87.
[27] Miller, A. (2001). Einstein, Picasso: Space, Time, and the Beauty That Causes Havoc. New York: Basic Books.
[28] Muelder-Eaton, M. (1999). Basic Issues in Aesthetics. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
[29] Murdoch, I. (1959). The Sublime and the Good. Chicago Review, 13, 42-45.
[30] Peters, R. (1973). Aims of Education: A Conceptual Enquiry. In R. Peters (Ed.), The Philosophy of Education (pp. 1-35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[31] Richards, I., Ogden, C., & Wood, J. (1925). The Foundations of Aesthetics. New York: International Publishers.
[32] Richards, R. (2001). A New Aesthetic for Environmental Awareness: Chaos Theory, the Beauty of Nature, and Our Broader Humanistic Identity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41, 59-95.
[33] Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1996). The Sciences and Arts Share a Common Creative Aesthetic. In A. Tauber (Ed.), The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science (pp. 49-82). Boston, MA and London: Kluwer.
[34] Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2002). Aesthetic Cognition. International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 16, 61-77.
[35] Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of Informal Reasoning in the Context of Socioscientific Decision Making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 112-138.
[36] Santayana, G. (1955). The Sense of Beauty: Being the Outline of an Aesthetic Theory. New York: Dover.
[37] Schank, R. (2004). Making Minds Less Well Educated than Our Own. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[38] Shapshay, S. (2013). Contemporary Environmental Aesthetics and the Neglect of the Sublime. British Journal of Aesthetics, 53, 181-198.
[39] Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era. New York: Garland.
[40] Slattery, P., & Rapp, D. (2003). Ethics and the Foundation of Education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
[41] Sorell, T. (2000). Moral Theory and Anomaly. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
[42] Stone, B. E. (2006). Curiosity as the Thief of Wonder: An Essay on Heidegger’s Critique of the Ordinary Conception of Time. Kronoscope, 6, 205-229.
[43] Tauber, A. I. (1996). The Elusive Synthesis: Science and Aesthetics. Boston, MA and London: Kluwer.
[44] Taylor, J. (1998). Poetic Knowledge: The Recovery of Education. New York: SUNY Press.
[45] Walker, K. A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Promoting Discourse about Socioscientific Issues through Scaffolded Inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1387-1410.
[46] Wals, A. E. J. (2011). Learning Our Way to Sustainability. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 5, 177-186.
[47] Whitehead, A. (1933). Adventure of Ideas. New York: McMillan.
[48] Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific Issues: Theory and Practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21, 49-58.
[49] Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A Research-Based Framework for Socioscientific Issues Education. Science Education, 89, 357-377.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.