Contribution of Dry Forest Products to Household Income and Determinants of Forest Income Levels in the Northwestern and Southern Lowlands of Ethiopia

Busha Teshome¹, Habtemariam Kassa², Zerihun Mohammed³, Christine Padoch⁴

¹Forestry Research Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
²Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Ethiopia Office, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
³Forum for Social Studies, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
⁴Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.

DOI: 10.4236/nr.2015.65030                

Abstract

Dry forests are dominant vegetation types in East Africa. The contribution of these resources to local livelihoods is poorly understood. This study was conducted to quantify the contribution of dry forest products to household income and to identify factors that influence forest income level in the northwestern and southern lowlands of Ethiopia. Data was collected using key informant interviews, focus group discussions and formal survey administered to 428 randomly selected households from representative districts in three regional states. Regression analysis, one way ANOVA, chi-square and t-tests were used to analyze the quantitative data. The major sources of household income are crop production, livestock farming, forest products, off- and non-farm activities, and remittances and aid, contributing respectively to 46.3%, 27.6%, 17.0%, 6.3% and 2.8% of the household income. The relative importance of forest income to total household income varied significantly across wellbeing categories (P < 0.001), representing 31.8%, 15.5% and 9.9% respectively for poor, medium and rich households and also between male headed (16.1%) and female headed (23.5%) households(P < 0.001). In terms of magnitude, however, forest income differed significantly (P < 0.05) with wealth category of households but not with the gender of the household head. Forest income level was significantly and positively influenced by family size (P < 0.01) and being a member of gums and resins producers cooperative (P < 0.01), while distance to the forest resource (P < 0.01) and being in Tigray or Amhara Regional States (Oromia being reference state) negatively and significantly affected forest income levels of households. Attempts to promote sustainable management of dry forests should recognize these factors that influence access to forests and forest income level of different members of the community to ensure equitable responsibility and benefit sharing arrangements and inclusive participation for better livelihoods and conservation outcomes.

Keywords

Gender, Gums and Resins, Fire Wood, Forest Management, Livelihoods, Wealth Category

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Niehof, A. (2004) The Significance of Diversification for Rural Livelihood Systems. Food Policy, 29, 321-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.07.009
[2]	Rakodi, C. (1999) Poverty in the Peri-Urban Interface. Report for the DFID Natural Resources Systems Research Programme, Research Advances No. 5, London.
[3]	CIFOR Center for International Forestry Research (2011) Focus on Forest: Time to Act: Annual Report 2010. CIFOR Annual Report, Bogor.
[4]	Abebe, Y., Teshome T., Mohammed, A. and Mesfin, H. (2004) Conservation of Genetic Resources of Non-Timber Forest Products in Ethiopia: Availability, Uses and Trends of Non-Timber Forest Products in Mendi Area, West Wellega, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 118-130.
[5]	Gebru, Y., Ewonetu, Z., Kassa, H. and Christine, P. (2014) Determinants of Producers’ Participation in Gums and Resins Value Chains from Dry Forests and Analysis of Marketing Channels in Northwestern and Southern Ethiopia. Forest, Tress and Livelihoods, 23, 56-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2013.875278
[6]	Shackleton, S., Campbell, B., Lotz-Sisitka, H. and Shackleton, C. (2008) Links between the Local Trade in Natural Products, Livelihoods and Poverty Alleviation in a Semi-Arid Region of South Africa. World Development, 36, 505- 526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.003
[7]	Levang, P., Dounias, E. and Sitorus, S. (2005) Out of the Forest, out of Poverty? Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 15, 211-235.
[8]	Cavendish, W. (2000) Empirical Regularities in the Poverty-Environment Relationship of Rural Households: Evidence from Zimbabwe. World Development, 28, 1979-2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00066-8
[9]	Eshete, A., Teketay, D. and Hulten, H. (2005) The Socio-Economic Importance and Status of Populations of Boswellia papyrifera (DEL.) Hochst. in Northern Ethiopia: The Case of North Gondar Zone. Forests Trees and Livelihoods, 15, 55-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2005.9752507
[10]	Mamo, G., Sjaastad, E., Vedeld, P. (2007) Economic Dependence of Forest Resources: A Case from Dendi District, Ethiopia. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 916-927. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2006.08.001
[11]	Babulo, B., Muys, B., Nega, F., Tollens, E., Nyssen, J., Deckers, J. and Mathijs, E. (2008) Household Livelihood Strategies and Forest Dependence in the Highlands of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Agricultural Systems, 98, 147-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2008.06.001
[12]	Worku, A., Limenh, M., Fetene, M. and Teketay, D. (2011) Socio-Economic Importance of Gum and Resin Resources in the Dry Woodlands of Borana, Southern Ethiopia. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 20, 137-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2011.9756703
[13]	Abebaw, D., Kassa, H., Kassie, G.T., Lemenih, M., Campbell, B. and Teka, W. (2012) Dry Forest Based Livelihoods in Resettlement Areas of Northwestern Ethiopia. Forest Policy and Economics, 20, 72-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.02.002
[14]	Asfaw, A., Lemenih, M., Kassa, H. and Ewnetu, Z. (2013) Importance, Determinants and Gender Dimensions of Forest Income in Eastern Highlands of Ethiopia: The Case of Communities around Jelo Afromontane Forest. Forest Policy and Economics, 28, 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.01.005
[15]	Mengistu, T., Teketay, D., Hulten, H. and Yemishaw, Y. (2005) The Role of Enclosure in the Recovery of Woody Vegetation in Degraded Dryland Hillsides of Central and Northern Ethiopia. Journal of Arid Environments, 60, 259-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.03.014
[16]	Lemenih, M. and Kassa, H. (2011) Management Guide for Sustainable Production of Frankincense: A Manual for Extension Workers and Companies Managing Dry Forests for Resin Production and Marketing. CIFOR, Bogor, 30 p.
[17]	Tadesse, W., Desalegn, G. and Alia, R. (2007) Natural Gum and Resin Bearing Species of Ethiopia and Their Potential Applications. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, 16, 211-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/srf/2007163-01010
[18]	Kassa, H., Tefera, B. and Fitwi, G. (2011) Preliminary Value Chain Analysis of Gums and Resins Marketing in Ethiopia: Issues for Policy and Research. CIFOR Brief No. 4, CIFOR, Bogor.
[19]	Janzen, D.H. (1988) Tropical Dry Forests: The Most Endangered Major Tropical Ecosystem. In: Wilson, E.O. and Peters, F.M., Eds., Biodiversity, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 130-144.
[20]	Mwangi, E. and Dohrn, S. (2006) Biting the Bullet: How to Secure Access to Drylands Resources for Multiple Users. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.
[21]	CIFOR Center for International Forestry Research (2008) Thinking beyond the Canopy. CIFOR Annual Report, Bogor.
[22]	Food and Agricultural Organization (2010) Guidelines on Sustainable Forest Management in Drylands of Sub-Saharan Africa. Arid Zone Forests and Forestry Working Paper No. 1, Rome.
[23]	PEN (2007) PEN Technical Guidelines. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor. http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/pen/_ref/tools/index.htm
[24]	Shackleton, C.M. and Shackleton, S.E. (2004) The Importance of Non-Timber Forest Products in Rural Livelihood Security and as Safety Nets: A Review of Evidence from South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 100, 658- 664.
[25]	Ros-Tonen, M.A.F. and Wiersum, K.F. (2005) The Scope for Improving Rural Livelihoods through Non-Timber Forest Products: An Evolving Research Agenda. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 15, 129-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2005.9752516
[26]	Magar, D.T. (2008) Contribution of Non-Timber Forest Products in the Livelihood of Chepang Community. Social Inclusion Research Fund (SIRF), Kathmandu.
[27]	Griffin, N.J., Banks, D.I., Mavrandonis, J., Shackleton, C.M. and Shackleton, S.E. (1992) Household Energy and Wood Use in a Peripheral Rural Area of the Eastern Transvaal Lowveld. Department of Minerals and Energy Affairs, Pretoria.
[28]	Shackleton, C.M. and Shackleton, S.E. (2006) Household Wealth Status and Natural Resource Use in the Kat River Valley, South Africa. Ecological Economics, 57, 306-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.011
[29]	Arnold, J.E.M. and Ruiz-Pérez, M. (2001) Can Non-Timber Forest Products Match Tropical Forest Conservation and Development Objectives? Ecological Economics, 39, 437-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00236-1
[30]	Byron, N. and Arnold, M. (1999) What Futures for the People of the Tropical Forests? World Development, 27, 789- 805. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00025-X
[31]	Hegde, R. and Enters, T. (2000) Forest Products and Household Economy: A Case Study from Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, Southern India. Environmental Conservation, 27, 250-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S037689290000028X