Selecting the Six Sigma Project: A Multi Data Envelopment Analysis Unified Scoring Framework


The importance of the project selection phase in any six sigma initiative cannot be emphasized enough. The successfulness of the six sigma initiative is affected by successful project selection. Recently, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been proposed as a six sigma project selection tool. However, there exist a number of different DEA formulations which may affect the selection process and the wining project being selected. This work initially applies nine different DEA formulations to several case studies and concludes that different DEA formulations select different wining projects. Also in this work, a Multi-DEA Unified Scoring Framework is proposed to overcome this problem. This framework is applied to several case studies and proved to successfully select the six sigma project with the best performance. The framework is also successful in filtering out some of the projects that have “selective” excellent performance, i.e. projects with excellent performance in some of the DEA formulations and worse performance in others. It is also successful in selecting stable projects; these are projects that perform well in the majority of the DEA formulations, even if it has not been selected as a wining project by any of the DEA formulations.

Share and Cite:

Arafah, M. (2015) Selecting the Six Sigma Project: A Multi Data Envelopment Analysis Unified Scoring Framework. American Journal of Operations Research, 5, 129-150. doi: 10.4236/ajor.2015.53011.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Henderson, G.R. (2011) Six Sigma Quality Improvement with Minitab. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
[2] Coronado, R.B. and Antony, J. (2002) Critical Success Factors for the Successful Implementation of Six Sigma Projects in Organisations. The TQM Magazine, 14, 92-99.
[3] Antony, J., Antony, F.J., Kumar, M. and Rae Cho, B. (2007) Six Sigma in Service Organisations: Benefits, Challenges and Difficulties, Common Myths, Empirical Observations and Success Factors. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24, 294-311.
[4] Meredith, J.R. and Mantel Jr., S.J. (2011) Project Management: A Managerial Approach. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
[5] Saghaei, A. and Didehkhani, H. (2011) Developing an Integrated Model for the Evaluation and Selection of Six Sigma Projects Based on ANFIS and Fuzzy Goal Programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 721-728.
[6] Dinesh Kumar, U., Saranga, H., Ramírez-Márquez, J.E. and Nowicki, D. (2007) Six Sigma Project Selection Using Data Envelopment Analysis. The TQM Magazine, 19, 419-441.
[7] Zimmerman, J. and Weiss, J. (2005) Six Sigma’s Seven Deadly Sins. Quality, 44, 62-66.
[8] Deshmukh, S. and Lakhe, R. (2009) Development and Validation of an Instrument for Six Sigma Implementation in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. 2nd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology (ICETET).
[9] Kazemi, S.M., et al. (2012) Six Sigma Project Selections by Using a Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach: A Case Study in Poly Acryl Corp. CIE42 Proceedings, CIE and SAIIE, 306-1-306-9.
[10] Wyman, O. (2007) Keystone of Lean Six Sigma: Strong Middle Management. New York.
[11] Antony, J. and Banuelas, R. (2002) Key Ingredients for the Effective Implementation of Six Sigma Program. Measuring Business Excellence, 6, 20-27.
[12] Ray, S. and Das, P. (2010) Six Sigma Project Selection Methodology. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1, 293-309.
[13] George, M.O. (2010) The Lean Six Sigma Guide to Doing More with Less: Cut Costs, Reduce Waste, and Lower Your Overhead. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
[14] Larson, A. (2003) Demystifying Six Sigma: A Company-Wide Approach to Continuous Improvement. AMACOM, New York.
[15] Thomas, P. (2003) The Six Sigma Project Planner. McGraw, New York.
[16] Pyzdek, T. and Keller, P.A. (2010) The Six Sigma Handbook: A Complete Guide for Green Belts, Black Belts, and Managers at All Levels. 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
[17] Banuelas, R. and Antony, J. (2007) Application of Stochastic Analytic Hierarchy Process within a Domestic Appliance Manufacturer. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 29-38.
[18] Su, C.T. and Chou, C.J. (2008) A Systematic Methodology for the Creation of Six Sigma Projects: A Case Study of Semiconductor Foundry. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 2693-2703.
[19] Kahraman, C. and Büyüközkan, G. (2008) A Combined Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy Goal Programming Approach for Effective Six-Sigma Project Selection. Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing, 14, 599-615.
[20] Banuelas, R. and Antony, J. (2003) Going from Six Sigma to Design for Six Sigma: An Exploratory Study Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. The TQM Magazine, 15, 334-344.
[21] Kelly, W.M. (2002) Three Steps to Project Selection. Six Sigma Forum Magazine, 2, 29-32.
[22] Adams, C., Gupta, P. and Wilson, C. (2011) Six Sigma Deployment. Routledge, London.
[23] Pyzdek, T. (2000) Selecting Six Sigma Projects.
[24] Pande, P.S. and Neuman, R.P. (2000) The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies Are Honing Their Performance. 1st Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
[25] Kumar, M., Antony, J. and Cho, B.R. (2009) Project Selection and Its Impact on the Successful Deployment of Six Sigma. Business Process Management Journal, 15, 669-686.
[26] Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
[27] Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Zhu, J. (2011) Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer, Berlin.
[28] Lim, S. (2010) A Formulation of Cross-Efficiency in DEA and Its Applications. 40th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering (CIE).
[29] Despotis, D.K. (2002) Improving the Discriminating Power of DEA: Focus on Globally Efficient Units. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53, 314-323.
[30] Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A.Y. and Seiford, L.M. (1994) Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications. Springer, Berlin.
[31] Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W.D. and Zhu, J. (2008) Alternative Secondary Goals in DEA Cross-Efficiency Evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 113, 1025-1030.
[32] Anderson, T.R., Hollingsworth, K. and Inman, L. (2002) The Fixed Weighting Nature of a Cross-Evaluation Model. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17, 249-255.
[33] Doyle, J. and Green, R. (1994) Efficiency and Cross-Efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45, 567-578.
[34] Charnes, A., Haag, S., Jaska, P. and Semple, J. (1992) Sensitivity of Efficiency Classifications in the Additive Model of Data Envelopment Analysis. International Journal of Systems Science, 23, 789-798.
[35] Andersen, P. and Petersen, N.C. (1993) A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 39, 1261-1264. H
[36] Zhu, J. (2003) Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver. Vol. 51, Springer, Berlin.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.