Research on Operating Performance of Small-Sized Retailers—Case Study of City S Market

DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2015.32022   PDF   HTML   XML   2,671 Downloads   3,130 Views   Citations

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that small-sized retailers have weak competitiveness. This paper is intended to explore why they can survive in the market for a long time. It is proven that compared with large chain retailers, small-sized retailers are advantageous in employee utilization and gross margin despite of their weakness in commodity purchase and space utilization. Previous studies also reveal that small-sized retailers are significantly fewer in commercially developed regions than commercially underdeveloped regions, suggesting that it becomes harder for small-sized retailers to survive in the market along with gradual improvement of commercial facilities.

Share and Cite:

Zhang, J. (2015) Research on Operating Performance of Small-Sized Retailers—Case Study of City S Market. Open Journal of Business and Management, 3, 228-234. doi: 10.4236/ojbm.2015.32022.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Jin, B. (2003) Theory and Methodology of Measuring Enterprise Competitiveness. China Industrial Economics, 3, 5- 13.
[2] Hu, Y.-Q. (2012) Comprehensive Appraisement of Enterprise Competitiveness Based on Statistical Analysis. China Business & Trade, 8, 93-98.
[3] Zhang, F. (2012) Research on Assessment System of Supermarket Competitiveness. Business Economy, 9, 91-96.
[4] Bain, J.S. (1951) Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing, 1936-1940. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65, 293-324.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1882217
[5] Zhan, Y. and Nie, X. (2014) On the Influencing Factors of China’s Retail Market Concentration. Statistics and Decision, 406, 85-88.
[6] Clarke, R., et al. (2002) Buyer Power and Competition in European Food Retailing. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Vol. 8, 15-23.
[7] Dobson, P. and Inderst, R. (2007) Differential Buyer Power and the Waterbed Effect: Do Strong Buyers Benefit or Harm Consumers? European Competition Law Review, 28, 393-400.
[8] Sun, R.-P., Liu, W.-C. and Ren, J.-S. (2014) Research of Impact of Buyer Power of Retailers on the Relationship Quality between Retailers and Suppliers and Business Performance of Retailers—Theoretical Analysis and Research Proposition. Taxation and Economy, 2, 12-17.
[9] Mohr, J. and Nevin, J. (1990) Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels: A Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54, 36-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251758
[10] Lee, H.L., So, K.T. and Tang, C.S. (2000) The Value of Information Sharing in a Two Level-Supply Chain. Management Science, 46, 626-643.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.5.626.12047
[11] Xiao, J.-H. and Wang, H.-C. (2014) The Mechanism of Value Creation by Supply Chain Information Systems: A Perspective of Information Sharing. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 34, 2862-2871.
[12] Xie, L.-J. (2013) Distributor-Led Supply Chain Model and Implementation-Based on Comparison and Transformation of Similar Distribution Channels. Economic Theory and Business Management, 7, 103-112.
[13] Wang, N.-X., Zhong, W.-J. and Mei, S.-E. (2010) Information Technology, Core Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study. Management Science, 2, 52-64.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.