Reading Aloud Performance and Listening Ability in an L2: The Case of College-Level Japanese EFL Users

DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2015.52015   PDF   HTML   XML   4,458 Downloads   5,874 Views   Citations


Recent advance in neuropsychology has evidenced a facilitative role of sensorimotor activity for the development in L2 speech perception. The study attempted to examine the relationship between reading aloud (RA) performance, grammatical knowledge and listening ability with 31 college-level Japanese EFL users. The result demonstrated highly significant correlations between all the variables, and the subsequent multiple regression analysis also indicated RA significantly accounting for listening. Supplementary analyses dividing the participants by listening ability demonstrated that while significant correlation was maintained between L2 knowledge and listening with less-proficient listeners, it disappeared with proficient listeners; in contrast, significant correlation between RA and listening performance was maintained in both groups, indicating that production accuracy/fluency still played an important role in advanced L2 listening.

Share and Cite:

Kato, S. and Tanaka, K. (2015) Reading Aloud Performance and Listening Ability in an L2: The Case of College-Level Japanese EFL Users. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5, 187-206. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2015.52015.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Aljasser, F. (2008). The Effect of Teaching English Phonotactics on the Lexical Segmentation of English as a Foreign Language. System, 36, 94-106.
[2] Aoyama, K. (2003). Perception of Syllable-Initial and Syllable-Final Nasals in English by Korean and Japanese Speakers. Second Language Research, 19, 251-265.
[3] Bachman, L. F. (2004). Statistical Analyses for Language Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[4] Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
[5] Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The Episodic Buffer: A New Component of Working Memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417-423.
[6] Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E., & Papagno, C. (1998). The Phonological Loop as a Language Learning Device. Psychological Review, 105, 158-173.
[7] Bernhardt, E. B., & Kamil, M. L. (1995). Interpreting Relationships between L1 and L2 Reading: Consolidating the Linguistic Threshold and the Linguistic Interdependence Hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 16, 15-34.
[8] Bertin, E., & Striano, T. (2006). The Still-Face Response in Newborn, 1.5-, and 3-Month-Old Infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 29, 294-297.
[9] Birch, B. M. (2007). English L2 Reading: Getting to the Bottom (2nd ed.). Nahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[10] Bossers, B. (1991). On Thresholds, Ceilings and Short-Circuits: The Relation between L1 Reading, L2 Reading and L2 Knowledge. AILA Review, 8, 45-60.
[11] Callan, D. E., Jones, J. A., Callan, A. M., & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2004). Phonetic Perceptual Identification by Native- and Second-Language Speakers Differentially Activates Brain Regions Involved with Acoustic Phonetic Processing and Those Involved with Articulatory-Auditory/Orosensory Internal Models. NeuroImage, 22, 1182-1194.
[12] Carrell, P. L. (1991). Second Language Reading: Reading Ability or Language Proficiency? Applied Linguistics, 12, 159-179.
[13] Casserly, E. D., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Speech Perception and Production. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1, 629-647.
[14] Chee, M. W., Hon, N., Lee, H. L., & Soon, C. S. (2001). Relative Language Proficiency Modulates BOLD Signal Change When Bilinguals Perform Semantic Judgments. NeuroImage, 13, 1155-1163.
[15] Chen, X., Striano, T., & Rakoczy, R. (2004). Auditory-Oral Matching Behavior in Newborns. Developmental Science, 7, 42-47.
[16] Cogan, G. B., Thesen, T., Carlson, C., Doyle, W., Devinsky, O., & Pesaran, B. (2014). Sensory-Motor Transformations for Speech Occur Bilaterally. Nature, 507, 94-98.
[17] Cox, T., & Davies, R. S. (2012). Using Automatic Speech Recognition Technology with Elicited Oral Response Testing. CALICO Journal, 29, 601-618.
[18] Crosson, A. C., & Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Revisiting Assumptions about the Relationship of Fluent Reading to Comprehension: Spanish-Speakers’ Text-Reading Fluency in English. Reading and Writing, 23, 475-494.
[19] Dehaene, S., Pegado, F., Braga, L. W., Ventura, P., Nunes Filho, G., Jobert, A., Cohen, L. et al. (2010). How Learning to Read Changes the Cortical Networks for Vision and Language. Science, 330, 1359-1364.
[20] Derwing, T. M., Thomson, R. I., Foote, J. A., & Munro, M. J. (2012). A Longitudinal Study of Listening Perception in Adult Learners of English: Implications for Teachers. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68, 247-266.
[21] di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding Motor Events: A Neurophysiological Study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176-180.
[22] Ellis, N. C., & Sinclair, S. (1996). Working Memory in the Acquisition of Vocabulary and Syntax: Putting Language in Good Order. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 49, 234-250.
[23] Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the Gap between L2 Speech Perception Research and Phonological Theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551-585.
[24] Farnia, F., & Geva, E. (2011). Cognitive Correlates of Vocabulary Growth in English Language Learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 711-738.
[25] Feyten, C. (1991). The Power of Listening Ability: An Overlooked Dimension in Language Acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 75, 173-180.
[26] Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
[27] Field, J. (2008). Listening in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[28] French, L. (2003). Phonological Working Memory and L2 Acquisition: A Developmental Study of Quebec Francophone Children Learning English. Ph.D. Thesis, Québec: Université Laval.
[29] Gandour, J., Tong, Y., Talavage, T., Wong, D., Dzemidzic, M., Xu, Y., Li, X., & Lowe, M. (2007). Neural Basis of First and Second Language Processing of Sentence-Level Linguistic Prosody. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 94-108.
[30] Gibson, S. (2008). Reading Aloud: A Useful Learning Tool? ELT Journal, 62, 29-36.
[31] Goh, C. (2000). A Cognitive Perspective on Language Learners’ Listening Comprehension Problems. System, 28, 55-75.
[32] Graham, S. (2006). Listening Comprehension: The Learners’ Perspective. System, 34, 165-182.
[33] Hancin-Bhatt, B., & Bhatt, R. (1997). Optimal L2 Syllables: Interactions of Transfer and Developmental Effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 331-378.
[34] Hasegawa, M., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2002). An fMRI Study of Bilingual Sentence Comprehension and Workload. NeuroImage, 15, 647-660.
[35] Heiberger, R. M., & Holland, B. (2004). Statistical Analysis and Data Display: An Intermediate Course with Examples in S-Plus, R and SAS. New York: Springer.
[36] Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Intentional and Incidental Second Language Vocabulary Learning: A Reappraisal of Elaboration, Rehearsal and Automaticity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 258-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[37] Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Connectionist Models of Language Processing and the Training of Listening Skills with the Aid of Multimedia Software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16, 413-425.
[38] Hulstijn, J. H. (2011). Language Proficiency in Native and Nonnative Speakers: An Agenda for Research and Suggestions for Second-Language Assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8, 229-249.
[39] Iacoboni, M. (2008). The Role of Premotor Cortex in Speech Perception: Evidence from fMRI and rTMS. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102, 31-34.
[40] Ichitani, Y. (Ed.) (2011). Unicorn English Course I: New Edition. Tokyo: Bun-Eido.
[41] Iwamura, K., & Smillie, B. (2007). New Edition of TOEIC Test Trial Examination with 600 Questions. Tokyo: ALC.
[42] Janzen, J. (2007). Preparing Teachers of Second Language Reading. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 707-729.
[43] Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2007). Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. New York: Routledge.
[44] Kato, S. (2009a). Interaction between Processing and Maintenance in Online L2 Sentence Comprehension: Implications for Linguistic Threshold Hypothesis. Asian EFL Journal, 11, 235-273.
[45] Kato, S. (2009b). Suppressing Inner Speech in ESL Reading: Implications for Developmental Changes in Second Language Word Recognition Processes. Modern Language Journal, 93, 471-488.
[46] Kato, S. (2012). Bridging Theory and Practice: Developing Lower-Level Processing Skills in L2 Reading. The Language Learning Journal, 40, 193-206.
[47] Kiany, G. R., & Shiramiry, E. (2002). The Effect of Frequent Dictation on the Listening Comprehension Ability of Elementary EFL Learners. TESL Canada Journal, 20, 57-63.
[48] Kincaid, J. P., Fishburn, R. P., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of New Readability Formulas for Navy Enlisted Personnel (pp. 8-75). Technical Report Research Branch Report, Millington, TN: Naval Technical Training. Memphis, TN: US Naval Air Station.
[49] Koda, K. (2008). Impacts of Prior Literacy Experience on Second-Language Learning to Read. In K. Koda, & A. M. Zehler (Eds.), Learning to Read across Languages: Cross-Linguistic Relationships in First- and Second-Language Literacy Development (pp. 68-96). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[50] Koda, K., & Zehler, A. (Eds.). (2008). Learning to Read across Languages: Cross-Linguistic Relationships in First- and Second-Language Literacy Development. New York: Routledge.
[51] Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. (1983). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
[52] LaFrance, A., & Gottardo, A. (2005). A Longitudinal Study of Phonological Processing Skills and Reading in Bilingual Children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 559-578.
[53] Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A Guide to Doing Statistics in Second Language Research Using SPSS. New York: Routledge.
[54] Larson-Hall, J., & Herrington, R. (2010). Improving Data Analysis in Second Language Acquisition by Utilizing Modern Developments in Applied Statistics. Applied Linguistics, 31, 368-390.
[55] Laver, J. (1994). Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[56] Lee, J., & Schallert, D. L. (1997). The Relative Contribution of L2 Language Proficiency and L1 Reading Ability to L2 Reading Performance: A Test of the Threshold Hypothesis in an EFL Context. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 713-739.
[57] Levy, B. A. (1971). Role of Articulation in Auditory and Visual Short-Term Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 123-132.
[58] Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the Speech Code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461.
[59] Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The Motor Theory of Speech Perception Revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
[60] Londei, A., D’Ausilio, A., Basso, D., Sestieri, C., Del Gratta, C., Romani, G., & Belardinelli, M. O. (2010). Sensory-Motor Brain Network Connectivity for Speech Comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 567-580.
[61] Mampe, B., Friederici, A. D., Christophe, A., & Wermke, K. (2009). Newborns’ Cry Melody Is Shaped by Their Native Language. Current Biology, 19, 1994-1997.
[62] Mannell, R., Cox, F., & Harrington, J. (2009). An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology. Macquarie University.
[63] Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1989). Access and Integration: Projecting Sound onto Meaning. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical Representation and Process (pp. 3-24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[64] Meister, I. G., Wilson, S. M., Deblieck, C., Wu, A. D., & Iacoboni, M. (2007). The Essential Role of Premotor Cortex in Speech Perception. Current Biology, 17, 1692-1696.
[65] Mecartty, F. (2000). Lexical and Grammatical Knowledge in Reading and Listening Comprehension by Foreign Language Learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 11, 323-348.
[66] Miyasako, N. (2008). Is the Oral Reading Hypothesis Valid? Language Education and Technology, 45, 15-34.
[67] Morais, J., Bertelson, P., Cary, L., & Alegria, J. (1986). Literacy Training and Speech Segmentation. Cognition, 24, 45-64.
[68] Mochizuki, H. (2004). Application of Shadowing to TEFL in Japan: The Case of Junior High School Students. MA Thesis, Hyogo: Kwansei Gakuin University.
[69] Nassaji, H. (2014). The Role and Importance of Lower-Level Processes in Second Language Reading. Language Teaching, 47, 1-37.
[70] Nation, I. S. P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. New York: Routledge.
[71] Nation, K., & Hulme, C. (2011). Learning to Read Changes Children’s Phonological Skills: Evidence from a Latent Variable Longitudinal Study of Reading and Nonword Repetition. Developmental Science, 14, 649-659.
[72] Nuttall, C. (2005). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Oxford: Macmillan Education.
[73] Oberman, L. M., Winkielman, P., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2007). Face to Face: Blocking Facial Mimicry Can Selectively Impair Recognition of Emotional Expressions. Social Neuroscience, 2, 167-178.
[74] Ohata, K. (2004). Phonological Differences between Japanese and English: Several Potentially Problematic Areas of Pronunciation for Japanese ESL/EFL Learners. Asian EFL Journal, 6, 1-19.
[75] Osada, N. (2001). What Strategy Do Less Proficient Learners Employ in Listening Comprehension? A Rreappraisal of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Processing. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 5, 73-90.
[76] Price, C. J. (2012). A Review and Synthesis of the First 20 Years of PET and fMRI Studies of Heard Speech, Spoken Language and Reading. NeuroImage, 62, 816-847.
[77] Rauschecker, A. M., Pringle, A., & Watkins, K. E. (2008). Changes in Neural Activity Associated with Learning to Articulate Novel Auditory Pseudowords by Covert Repetition. Human Brain Mapping, 29, 1231-1242.
[78] Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The Mirror-Neuron System. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
[79] Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the Brain: How Our Minds Share Actions, Emotions, and Experience. New York: Oxford University Press.
[80] Roach, P. (2004). British English: Received Pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 34, 239-245.
[81] Robinson, P. (1997). Individual Differences and the Fundamental Similarity of Implicit and Explicit Adult Second Language Learning. Language Learning, 47, 45-99.
[82] Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and Second Language Acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46-73.
[83] Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and Researching Listening. Harlow: Longman.
[84] Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Disruption of Short-Term Memory by Unattended Speech: Implications for the Structure of Working Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 21, 150-164.
[85] Segalowitz, N. (2003). Automaticity and Second Languages. In C. Doughty, & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 382-408). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
[86] Service, E. (1992). Phonology, Working Memory, and Foreign-Language Learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 45, 21-50.
[87] Shichino, M. (2006). Effects of Repeated Oral Reading Practice on the Reproduction of Key Words and Phrases. 46th Annual Conference of the Japan Association for Language Education and Technology, Kyoto, 3 August 2006, 103-109.
[88] Shimizu, M. (2009). An Examination of Reliability of an Oral Reading Test for EFL Learners Using Generalizability Theory. ARELE: Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan, 20, 181-190.
[89] Skipper, J. I., Nusbaum, H. C., & Small, S. L. (2005). Listening to Talking Faces: Motor Cortical Activation during Speech Perception. NeuroImage, 25, 76-89.
[90] Suzuki, J. (1998). A Reprisal of Reading Aloud: An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of Reading Aloud (pp. 13-28). LET Kansai Chapter Collected Papers 7, Kobe, Hyogo: Rokko-Shuppan.
[91] Taillefer, G. F. (1996). L2 Reading Ability: Further Insight into the Short-Circuit Hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 461-477.
[92] Thomson, R. I. (2012). Improving L2 Learners’ Perception of English Vowels: A Computer-Mediated Approach. Language Learning, 62, 1231-1258.
[93] Vandergrift, L. (2003). From Prediction through Reflection: Guiding Students: Through the Process of L2 Listening. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 425-440.
[94] Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second Language Listening: Listening Ability or Language Proficiency? The Modern Language Journal, 90, 6-18.
[95] Vandergrift, L. (2011). Second Language Listening: Presage, Process, Product and Pedagogy. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (2nd ed., pp. 455-471). New York: Routledge.
[96] Vinther, T. (2002). Elicited Imitation: A Brief Overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 54-73.
[97] Walter, C. (2008). Phonology in Second Language Reading: Not an Optional Extra. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 455-474.
[98] Wang, Y., Sereno, J. A., Jongman, A., & Hirsch, J. (2003). fMRI Evidence for Cortical Modification during Learning of Mandarin Lexical Tone. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1019-1027.
[99] Williams, J. N., & Lavatt, P. (2005). Phonological Memory and Rule Learning. Language Learning, 55, 177-233.
[100] Wilson, M. (2003). Discovery Listening: Improving Perceptual Processing. ELT Journal, 57, 335-343.
[101] Wilson, S. M., & Iacoboni, M. (2006). Neural Responses to Non-Native Phonemes Varying in Producibility: Evidence for the Sensorimotor Nature of Speech Perception. NeuroImage, 33, 316-325.
[102] Wormann, V., Holodynski, M., Kartner, J., & Keller, H. (2012). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Development of the Social Smile: A Longitudinal Study of Maternal and Infant Imitation in 6- and 12-Week-Old Infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 35, 335-347.
[103] Wu, S. L., & Ortega, L. (2013). Measuring Global Oral Proficiency in SLA Research: A New Elicited Imitation Test of L2 Chinese. Foreign Language Annals, 46, 680-704.
[104] Xue, G., Dong, Q., Jin, Z., & Chen, C. (2004). Mapping of Verbal Working Memory in Nonfluent Chinese-English Bilinguals with Functional MRI. NeuroImage, 22, 1-10.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.