Rehabilitating the Factor-Proportions Hypothesis


The Heckscher-Ohlin theory of international trade remains an enigma. Despite being falsified on numerous counts [1] [2], it persists as the core theory of international trade, found both in undergraduate and graduate textbooks, not to mention in much research and policy. However, while it has failed to be confirmed by the data, the notion that factor proportions motivate trade, whether at the regional or national level, continues to hold sway. This paper is an attempt at rehabilitating the factor proportions hypothesis (FPH) as a theory of interregional and international trade. An alternative formalization, based on evolutionary principles (endogenous technology, mobile capital and labor), is presented and is used to rationalize the paradoxical findings of HOH empirical tests. The predictions are then tested using a variety of techniques. It concludes by examining the policy implications.

Share and Cite:

Beaudreau, B. (2015) Rehabilitating the Factor-Proportions Hypothesis. Modern Economy, 6, 436-457. doi: 10.4236/me.2015.64042.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Bowen, H.P., Leamer, E. and Sveikauskas, L. (1987) Multicountry, Multifactor Tests of the Factor Abundance Theory. American Economic Review, 77, 791-809.
[2] Trefler, D. (1995) The Case of the Missing Trade and Other Mysteries. The American Economic Review, 85, 1029-1046.
[3] Trefler, D. and Zhu, S.C. (2010) The Structure of Factor Content Predictions. Journal of International Economics, 82, 195-207.
[4] Davis, D. and Weinstein, D. (2001) An Account of Global Factor Trade. American Economic Review, 91, 1423-1453.
[5] Bresnahan, T.F. and Trajtenberg, M. (1995) General Purpose Technologies: Engines of Growth? Journal of Econometrics, 65, 83-108.
[6] Helpman, E. and Trajtenberg, M. (1996) Diffusion of General Purpose Technologies. NBER Working Papers 5773, National Bureau of Economic Research.
[7] Hymer, S.H. (1976) The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Foreign Direct Investment (1960). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[8] Dunning, J. (1981) International Production and the Multinational Enterprise. George Allen and Unwin, London.
[9] Yeaple, S.R. (2003) The Role of Skill Endowments in the Structure of US Outward Foreign Direct Investment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 726-734.
[10] Grossman, G. and Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2008) Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring. American Economic Review, 98, 1978-1997.
[11] Baldwin, R. and Robert-Nicoud, F. (2014) Trade-in-Goods and Trade-in-Tasks: An Integrating Framework. Journal of International Economics, 92, 51-62.
[12] Beaudreau, B.C. (2011) Vertical Comparative Advantage. The International Trade Journal, 25, 305-348.
[13] World Bank (2007) Moving toward Competitiveness: A Value Chain Approach. World Bank, Washington DC.
[14] OECD-WTO (2013) Trade in Value Added Statistics.
[15] Beaudreau, B.C. (2004) World Trade: A Network Approach. iUniverse, New York.
[16] Mundell, R.A. (1957) International Trade and Factor Mobility. American Economic Review, 47, 321-355.
[17] Helpman, E. (1984) A Simple Theory of International Trade with Multinational Corporations. Journal of Political Economy, 92, 451-471.
[18] Power, S. (1987) The Origins of the Heckscher-Ohlin Concept. History of Political Economy, 19, 289-298.
[19] Eaton, J. and Kortum, S. (2002) Technology, Geography, and Trade. Econometrica, 70, 1741-1779.
[20] Porter, M.E. (1985) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. The Free Press, New York.
[21] Beaudreau, B.C. (1989) Entrepreneurial Ability, International Trade, and Foreign Direct Investment. International Economic Journal, 3, 1-22.
[22] Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
[23] Monczka, R.M. and Trent, R.J. (1991) Global Sourcing: A Development Approach. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 27, 2-8.
[24] Min, H. and Galle, W.P. (1991) International Purchasing Strategies of Multinational US Firms. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 27, 9-18.
[25] Scully, J.I. and Fawcett, S.E. (2004) International Procurement Strategies: Challenges and Opportunities for the Small Firm. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 35, 39-46.
[26] Lundstedt, S. and Colglazier Jr., E.W. (1982) Managing Innovation: The Social Dimensions of Creativity, Invention and Technology. Pergamon Press, New York.
[27] Griffiths, M.D. and Kickul, J. (2008) The Socioeconomic Determinants of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 9, 231-240.
[28] Hummels, D., Ishii, J. and Yi, K. (2001) The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade. Journal of International Economics, 54, 75-96.
[29] Hummels, D., Rapoport, D. and Yi, K. (1998) Vertical Specialization and the Changing Nature of World Trade. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 4, 79-99.
[30] Reimer, J. (2006) Global Production Sharing and Trade in the Services of Factors. Journal of International Economics, 68, 384-408.
[31] Johnson, R.C. (2008) Factor Trade Forensics with Intermediate Goods. Princeton University Department of Economics Working Paper.
[32] Johnson, R. and Noguera, G. (2008) Accounting for Intermediate Goods and Trade in Value Added. Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
[33] Griffiths, M.D. and Kickul, J. (2008) The Socioeconomic Determinants of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 9, 231-240.
[34] Leontief, W. (1953) Domestic Production and Foreign Trade: The American Capital Position Re-Examined. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 97, 332-349.
[35] Pepper, J.D. (1999) National Benefits from Global R & D. Industrial Research Institute Annual Meeting, Williamsburg, Virginia.
[36] Foster, N., Stehrer, R. and de Vriees, G. (2011) Patterns of Net Trade in Value Added and Factors. Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, Vienna.
[37] Ibid, 24.
[38] US Department of Commerce (1981) Annual Survey of Manufactures. Bureau of the Census, Washington DC.
[39] OECD (2007) Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in a Changing World: Responding to Policy Needs. OECD, Paris.

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.