Understanding the Effects of Various Factors on the Public Response to Congestion Charge: A Latent Class Modeling Approach

Sugiarto Sugiarto^1*, Tomio Miwa², Hitomi Sato³, Takayuki Morikawa³

¹Department of Civil Engineering, Syiah Kuala University, Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
²EcoTopia Science Institute, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
³Institute of Innovation for Future Society, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

DOI: 10.4236/jtts.2015.52008                

Abstract

The standard ordered response model (SORM) is a common disaggregate approach with ordered outcomes in which the effects of various exogenous attributes are assumed constant across ordinal choices. In this study, an innovative latent class based generalized ordered response model (LC-GORM) is formulated and used to assess the effects of various factors on respondents’ choice behavior with respect to congestion charge proposal for Jakarta, Indonesia. The proposed model probabilistically assigns respondents into selfish and altruistic class memberships (latently) based on their knowledge of the proposed scheme and their specific attributes. Aiming to capture observable preference heterogeneity across ordinal choices and allow the thresholds to be varied across observations, we parameterize the thresholds as a linear function of the exogenous variables for each ordinal preference. Using stated preference data collected in Jakarta in December 2013, we incorporate the influence of a comprehensive set of explanatory variables into four categories: charges, latent variables related to respondent’s psychological motivations, mobility attributes and socio-demographic characteristics. Empirical results obviously verify the existence of preference heterogeneity across outcomes. The findings confirm that the altruistic class are more sensitive with respect to acceptance of the scheme, while the selfish class are more sensitive with respect to rejection. The key factors influencing public acceptability include the charge level and respondent variables such as car dependency, awareness of the problem of cars in society, frequency of visits to the city center and frequency of private mode usage.

Keywords

Respondent’s Choice Behavior, Latent Types of Respondents, Latent Class, Congestion Charge

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	BPS (2010) Statistical Yearbook of Jakarta, Indonesia. Statistics Bureau of the Republic of Indonesia.
[2]	JUTPI (2012) Jabodetabek Urban Transportation Policy Integration Project. Ministry of Economic Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia & Japan International Cooperation Agency, Jakarta.
[3]	SITRAMP (2004) The Study on Integrated Transportation Master Plan for Jabodetabek. National Development Planning Agency of the Republic of Indonesia & Japan International Cooperation Agency, Jakarta.
[4]	Janssens, D., Cools, M., Moons, E., Wets, G., Arentze, T.A. and Timmermans, H.J.P. (2009) Road Pricing as an Impetus for Environment-Friendly Travel Behavior: Results from a Stated Adaptation Experiment. Journal of the Transportation Research Record, 115, 50-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2115-07
[5]	Phang, S.Y. and Toh, R.S. (1997) From Manual to Electronic Road Congestion Pricing: the Singapore Experience and Experiment. Transportation Research Part E, 33, 97-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(97)00006-9
[6]	Olszewsi, P. and Xie, L. (2006) Modeling the Effects of Road Pricing on Traffic in Singapore. Transportation Research Part A, 39, 755-772.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.02.015
[7]	Eliasson, J. and Mattsson, L.G. (2006) Equity Effects of Congestion Pricing: Quantitative Methodology and a Case Study for Stockholm. Transportation Research Part A, 40, 602-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.11.002
[8]	May, A.D., Koh, A., Blackledge, D. and Fioretto, M. (2010) Overcoming the Barriers to Implementing Urban Road User Charging Schemes. European Transport Research Review, 2, 53-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12544-010-0026-1
[9]	Zeng, Z., Liu, Z., Liu, C. and Shiwakoti, N. (2014) Understanding Public Response to a Congestion Charge: A Random-Effects Ordered Logit Approach. Transportation Research Part A, 70, 117-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.016
[10]	Gaunt, M., Rye, T. and Allen, T. (2007) Public Acceptability of Road Pricing: The Case of Edinburgh and the 2005 Referendum. Transport Reviews, 27, 85-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01441640600831299
[11]	Schaller, B. (2010) New York City’s Congestion Pricing Experience and Implications for Road Pricing Acceptance in the United States. The 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, 10-14 January 2010.
[12]	Falzarano, S. (2009) Regionwide Congestion Pricing Study in Chicago: Stated Preference Survey Purpose, Approach and Outcomes. The 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, 11-15 January 2009.
[13]	Odioso, M. and Smith, M. (2009) Perception of Congestion Charging: Lesson for U.S. Cities from London and Stockholm. The 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, 11-15 January 2009.
[14]	Jaensirisak, S., Wardman, M. and May, A.D. (2005) Explaining Variation in Public Acceptability of Road Pricing Scheme. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 39, 127-153.
[15]	Sugiarto, S., Miwa, T., Sato, H. and Morikawa, T. (2014) Congestion Charging: Influence of Public Consciousness on Acceptability in Jakarta Metropolitan Area (Scientific Paper). Proceedings of 21st World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Detroit, 7-11 September 2014.
[16]	Joreskog, K.G. and Goldberger, A.S. (1975) Estimating of a Model with Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes of a Single Latent Variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 631-639. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2285946
[17]	Long, J.S. (1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
[18]	Winkelmann, R. and Boes, S. (2009) Analysis of Microdata. 2nd Edition, Springer, Berlin.
[19]	Maddala, G.S. (1983) Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810176
[20]	Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. and Mullen, M.R. (2008) Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53-60.
[21]	Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S.R. (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. The MIT Press, Cambridge.