Promoting Comprehension Skills among At-Risk First Graders: The Role of Motivation in One-to-One Tutoring Environment

Baha Makhoul^1,2,3*, Elite Olshtain², Raphiq Ibrahim⁴

¹Oranim Academic College of Education, Tivon, Israel.
²The NCJW Research Institute for Innovation in Education, Hebrew University, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel.
³CET—Center for Educational Technology, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
⁴The Edmond J. Safra Brain Research Center and the Learning Disabilities Department, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2015.64034                

Abstract

The current study investigated the role of motivation in promoting reading comprehension skills among at-risk first graders. For this purpose, 20 at-risk first graders were recruited to participate in an interactive one-to-one tutoring reading comprehension intervention program. Following the children and tutors motivation level, four sub-groups were created: highly motivated children/ highly motivated tutors (HM-T/HM-L), highly motivated children/low motivated tutors (HM-L/ HM-T), low motivated children/highly motivated tutors (LM-L/HM-T) and low motivated children/ low motivated tutors (LM-L/LM-T). The children’s progress in comprehension measures was documented. Across different time periods greater improvement was obtained among highly motivated children who were tutored by highly motivated tutor. The implications of the current findings were discussed.

Keywords

Motivation, Comprehension Skills, At-Linguistic Risk, Interactive Model, Computer Assisted, Intervention Program

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[2]	Anmarkrud, Ø., & Braten, I. (2009). Motivation for Reading Comprehension. Learningand Individual Differences, 19, 252-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.002
[3]	Ames, C. (1984). Achievement Attributions and Self-Instructions under Competitive and Individualistic Goal Structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.3.478
[4]	Askew, B. J., Kaye, E., Frasier, D. F., Fort Bend, I. S. D., Mobasher, M., Anderson, N., & Rodríguez, Y. G. (2003). Making a Case for Prevention in Education. Literacy, 6, 43-73.
[5]	Askew, B. J., Wickstrom, C., & Frasier, D. F. (1996). An Exploration of Literacy Behaviors of Children Following an Early Intervention Program. New York, NY: American Educational Research Association Conference.
[6]	Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An Introduction to Motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
[7]	Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of Children’s Motivation for Reading and Their Relations to Reading Activity and Reading Achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452-477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.34.4.4
[8]	Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Blackwell.
[9]	Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013006004
[10]	Cadima, J., Leal, T., & Burchinal, M. (2010). The Quality of Teacher-Student Interactions: Associations with First Graders’ Academic and Behavioral Outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 457-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2010.09.001
[11]	Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2004). Reading Comprehension Difficulties. In Handbook of Children’s Literacy (pp. 313-338). Heidelberg: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1731-1_18
[12]	Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s Reading Comprehension Ability: Concurrent Prediction by Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Component Skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
[13]	Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P., & Fey, M. E. (2003). Subgrouping Poor Readers on the Basis of Individual Differences in Reading-Related Abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 151-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221940303600208
[14]	Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (1995). Development of Young Children’s Reading Self-Concepts: An Examination of Emerging Subcomponents and Their Relationship with Reading Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 154-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.154
[15]	Clay, M. M. (1985). The Early Detection of Reading Difficulties (3rd ed.). Auckland: Heinemann.
[16]	D’Agostino, J. V., & Murphy, J. A. (2004). A Meta-Analysis of Reading Recovery in United States Schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 23-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/01623737026001023
[17]	Davidson, N., & O’Leary, P. W. (1990). How Cooperative Learning Can Enhance Mastery Teaching. Educational Leadership, 47, 30-33.
[18]	DeFord, D. E., Pinnell, G. S., Lyons, C. A., & Young, P. (1988). Reading Recovery: Vol. IX, Report of the Follow-Up Studies. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
[19]	Denton, C. A., Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J. M. (2003). Bringing Research-Based Practice in Reading Intervention to Scale. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 201-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00075
[20]	Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational Processes Affecting Learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
[21]	Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Tejero Hughes, M., & Watson Moody, S. (2000). How Effective Are One-to-One Tutoring Programs in Reading for Elementary Students at Risk for Reading Failure? A Meta-Analysis of the Intervention Research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605-619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.605
[22]	Emmer, E. T., & Stough, L. M. (2001). Classroom Management: A Critical Part of Educational Psychology, with Implications for Teacher Education. Educational Psychologist, 36, 103-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_5
[23]	Emmer, E., Sabornie, E., Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (Eds.) (2013). Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues. London: Routledge.
[24]	Foorman, B. R., & Torgesen, J. (2001). Critical Elements of Classroom and Small-Group Instruction Promote Reading Success in All Children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 203-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0938-8982.00020
[25]	Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic Intrinsic Motivation in Young Elementary School Children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 525-538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.525
[26]	Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
[27]	Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing Inferences during Narrative Text Comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
[28]	Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading Motivation and Reading Comprehension Growth in the Later Elementary Years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 282-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.004
[29]	Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N. M., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., & Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of Stimulating Tasks on Reading Motivation and Comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 232-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.4.232-246
[30]	Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and Cognitive Predictors of Text Comprehension and Reading Amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 231-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_3
[31]	Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2001). A New Tool for Measuring and Understanding Individual Differences in the Component Processes of Reading Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 103-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.103
[32]	Hiebert, E. H., & Pearson, P. D. (2000). Building on the Past, Bridging to the Future: A Research Agenda for the Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 133-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598702
[33]	Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The Simple View of Reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799
[34]	Houge, T. T., Geier, C., & Peyton, D. (2008). Targeting Adolescents’ Literacy Skills Using One-to-One Instruction with Research-Based Practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51, 640-650. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.51.8.3
[35]	Jenkins, J. R., Mayhall, W. F., Peschka, C. M., & Jenkins, L. M. (1974). Comparing Small Group and Tutorial Instruction in Resource Rooms. Exceptional Children, 40, 245-250.
[36]	Juel, C. (1991). Cross-Age Tutoring between Student Athletes and At-Risk Children. The Reading Teacher, 45, 178-186.
[37]	Juel, C. (1996). What Makes Literacy Tutoring Effective? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 268-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.31.3.3
[38]	Kaplan, A., Middleton, M. J., Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2002). Achievement Goals and Goal Structures. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, Goal Structures, and Patterns of Adaptive Learning (pp. 21-53). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[39]	Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations in the Classroom: Age Differences and Academic Correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184
[40]	Logan, S., Medford, E., & Hughes, N. (2011). The Importance of Intrinsic Motivation for High and Low Ability Readers’ Reading Comprehension Performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 124-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.011
[41]	Long, D. L., & Chong, J. L. (2001). Comprehension Skill and Global Coherence: A Paradoxical Picture of Poor Comprehenders’ Abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1424-1429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1424
[42]	Maehr, M. L. (1984). Meaning and Motivation: Toward a Theory of Personal Investment. Research on Motivation in Education, 1, 115-144.
[43]	Mathewson, G. C. (1994). Model of Attitude Influence upon Reading and Learning to Read. In R. B. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (3rd ed., pp. 1131-1161). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
[44]	Meehan, B. T., Hughes, J. N., & Cavell, T. A. (2003). Teacher-Student Relationships as Compensatory Resources for Aggressive Children. Child Development, 74, 1145-1157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00598
[45]	Nation, K., & Snowling, M. (1997). Assessing Reading Difficulties: The Validity and Utility of Current Measures of Reading Skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 359-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01250.x
[46]	Nation, K., Clarke, P., Marshall, C. M., & Durand, M. (2004). Hidden Language Impairments in Children Parallels between Poor Reading Comprehension and Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 199-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/017)
[47]	Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement Motivation: Conceptions of Ability, Subjective Experience, Task Choice, and Performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328
[48]	Parrila, R., Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Nurmi, J. E., & Kirby, J. R. (2005). Development of Individual Differences in Reading: Results from Longitudinal Studies in English and Finnish. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 299-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.299
[49]	Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The Acquisition of Reading Comprehension Skill. In M. J. Snowling, & C. Hulme (Eds.), The Science of Reading: A Handbook (pp. 227-247). Oxford: Blackwell.
[50]	Perfetti, C. A., Marron, M. A., & Foltz, P. W. (1996). Sources of Comprehension Failure: Theoretical Perspectives and Case Studies. In C. Cornoldi, & J. V. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading Comprehension Difficulties: Processes and Remediation (pp. 137-165). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[51]	Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading Ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
[52]	Pianta, R. C., Steinberg, M. S., & Rollins, K. B. (1995). The First Two Years of School: Teacher-Child Relationships and Deflections in Children’s Classroom Adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 295-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400006519
[53]	Pinnell, G. S., Lyons, C. A., Deford, D. E., Bryk, A. S., & Seltzer, M. (1994). Comparing Instructional Models for the Literacy Education of High-Risk First Graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 8-39.
[54]	Pinnell, G. S., Short, A. G., Lyons, C. A., & Young, P. (1986). The Reading Recovery Project in Columbus, OH, Year I: 1985-1986. Columbus., OH: Ohio State University.
[55]	Pressley, M. (2000). What Should Comprehension Instruction Be the Instruction of? In: M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. III, pp. 545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[56]	RAND Reading Study Group (2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
[57]	Rasinski, T., & Padak, N. (1996). Holistic Reading Strategies: Teaching Children Who Find Reading Difficult. Des Moines, IA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
[58]	Reeve, J., Bolt, E., & Cai, Y. (1999). Autonomy-Supportive Teachers: How They Teach and Motivate Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 537-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.537
[59]	Reis, S. M., Gubbins, E. J., Briggs, C. J., Schreiber, F. J., Richards, S., Jacobs, J. K., Eckert, R. D., & Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Reading Instruction for Talented Readers: Case Studies Documenting Few Opportunities for Continuous Progress. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 315-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800406
[60]	Rigby, C. S., Deci, E. L., Patrick, B. C., & Ryan, R. M. (1992). Beyond the Intrinsic-Extrinsic Dichotomy: Self-Determination in Motivation and Learning. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 165-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00991650
[61]	Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
[62]	Shanahan, T., & Barr, R. (1995). Reading Recovery: An Independent Evaluation of the Effects of an Early Instructional Intervention for At-Risk Learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 958-996. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/748206
[63]	Snow, C. (2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
[64]	Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.) (1998). Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
[65]	Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia. Oxford: Blackwell.
[66]	Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Word Recognition: Changing Perspectives. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Volume 2, pp. 418-452). New York: Longman.
[67]	Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
[68]	Stipek, D. J. (2002). Motivation to Learn: Integrating Theory and Practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
[69]	Taboada, A., Tonks, S. M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2009). Effects of Motivational and Cognitive Variables on Reading Comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22, 85-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9133-y
[70]	Taylor, B., Harris, L. A., Pearson, P. D., & Garcia, G. (1995). Reading Difficulties: Instruction and Assessment (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[71]	Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual Differences in Response to Early Interventions in Reading: The Lingering Problem of Treatment Resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/SLDRP1501_6
[72]	Tyler, J. H., Taylor, E. S., Kane, T. J., & Wooten, A. L. (2010). Using Student Performance Data to Identify Effective Classroom Practices. The American Economic Review, 100, 256-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.256
[73]	Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-Determination and Persistence in a Real-Life Setting: Toward a Motivational Model of High School Dropout. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 72, 1161-1176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161
[74]	Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Tanzman, M. S. (1994). Components of Reading Ability: Issues and Problems in Operationalizing Word Identification, Phonological Coding, and Orthographic Coding. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues (pp. 279-324). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
[75]	Wasik, B. A., & Slavin, R. E. (1993). Preventing Early Reading Failure with One-to-One Tutoring: A Review of Five Programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 179-200.
[76]	Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
[77]	Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2000). Engagement and Motivation in Reading. Handbook of Reading Research, 3, 403-422.
[78]	Wise, B. W., Ring, J., & Olson, R. K. (2000). Individual Differences in Gains from Computer-Assisted Remedial Reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 197-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1999.2559
[79]	Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J. (1991). Children’s Problems in Text Comprehension: An Experimental Investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.