Dynamic Capacity Allocation in OTN Networks

Maria Catarina Taful¹, João Pires^1,2

¹Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
²Institute of Telecommunications, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

DOI: 10.4236/cn.2015.71005                

Abstract

A dynamic Optical Transport Network (OTN) has the advantage of being able to adjust the connection capacity on demand in order to respond to variations on traffic patterns or to network failures. This feature has the potential to reduce operational costs and at the same time to optimize networks resources. Virtual Concatenation (VCAT) and Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) are two techniques that when properly combined can be used to provide improved dynamism in OTN networks. These techniques have been previously standardized in the context of Next Generation SDH/SONET networks. VCAT is used to tailor the capacity of network connections according to service requirements, while LCAS can adjust dynamically that capacity in a hitless manner. This paper presents an overview of the application of VCAT/LCAS techniques in the context of OTN. It explains in detail how these techniques can be employed to resize the connection capacity and analyses its use in network protection solutions. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of the time delays associated with different operations is provided and its application to some reference networks is undertaken. The obtained results provide an idea about the time delays of the capacity adjustment processes and define potential scenarios for implementing VCAT/LCAS techniques.

Keywords

OTN, VCAT, LCAS, Time Delay, Network Protection

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Gumaste, A. and Krishnaswamy, N. (2010) Proliferation of the Optical Transport Network: A Use Case Based Study. IEEE Communications Magazine, 48, 54-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2010.5560587
[2]	Carrol, M., Roese, J. and Ohara, T. (2010) The Operator’s View of OTN Evolution. IEEE Com-munications Magazine, 48, 46-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2010.5560586
[3]	ITU-T Rec. G.709 (2009) Interfaces for the Optical Transport Network (OTN).
[4]	ITU-T Rec. G.7044/Y.1347 (2011) Hitless Adjustment of ODUflex (GFP).
[5]	ITU-T Rec. G.7042/Y.1305 (2006) Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) for Virtual Concatenated Signals.
[6]	Bernstein, G., Caviglia, D., Rabbat, R. and Van Helvoort, H. (2006) VCAT/LCAS in a Clamshell. IEEE Communications Magazine, 44, 34-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2006.1637944
[7]	Santos, J., Pedro, J., Monteiro, P. and Pires, J. (2011) Optimized Routing and Buffer Design for Optical Transport Networks Based on Virtual Concatenation. Journal of Optical Communications and Ne-tworking, 3, 725-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.3.000725
[8]	Acharya, S., Gupta, B., Risbood, P. and Srivastava, A. (2004) PESO: Low Overhead Protection for Ethernet over SONET Transport. IEEE Infocom 2004, Hong Kong. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.2004.1354491
[9]	Roy, R. and Mukherjee B. (2008) Degraded-Service-Aware Multipath Provisioning in Telecom Mesh Networks. OFC/ NFOEC 2008, San Diego, 24-28 February 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/OFC.2008.4528661
[10]	Huang, S., Martel, C. and Mukherjee, B. (2011) Survivable Multipath Provisioning with Differential Delay Constraint in Telecom Mesh Networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 19, 657-669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2010.2082560
[11]	Ou, C., Sahasrabuddhe, L., Zhu, K., Martel, C. and Mukherjee, B. (2006) Survivable Virtual Con-catenation for Data over SONET/SDH in Optical Transport Networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 14, 218-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2005.863462
[12]	Han, D., Li, X. and Gu, W. (2006) The Impact of LCAS Dynamic Bandwidth Adjustment on SDH/SONET Network. Journal of Optical Communications, 27, 317-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JOC.2006.27.6.317
[13]	Pedro, J., Santos, J. and Pires, J. (2011) Performance Evaluation of Integrated OTN/DWDM Networks with Single-Stage Multiplexing of Optical Channel Data Units. ICTON 2011, Stockholm, 26-30 June 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2011.5970940
[14]	Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R. and Jacobson, V. (2003) RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications. RFC 3550.
[15]	Bernstein, G., Caviglia, D., Rabbat, R. and van Helvoort, H. (2011) Operating Virtual Concatenation (VCAT) and the Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) with Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Label Switching (GMPLS). RFC 6344.
[16]	Das, S., Parulkar, G., Singh, P., Getachew, D., Ong, L. and McKeown, N. (2010) Packet and Circuit Network Convergence with Open Flow. OFC/NFOEC’10, San Diego, 24-28 March 2010.
[17]	ITU-T Rec. G.841 (1998) Types and Characteristics of NG-SDH Network Protection Architectures.
[18]	Van Helvoort, H. (2005) Next Generation NG-SDH/SONET: Evolution or Revolution? John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0470091223