A Study on Comparative Fertility Restoration in A2 and A4 Cytoplasms and Its Implication in Breeding Hybrid Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh]


Exploitation of hybrid vigour has been visualized as the most efficient option for increasing productivity in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh]. Cytoplasms from various wild relatives of pigeonpea have been transferred to develop CMS lines in the background of cultivated pigeonpea. However, A2 (Cajanus scarabaeoides) and A4 (Cajanus cajanifolius) cytoplasms have been utilized most frequently. In order to study fertility restoration efficiency in F1 hybrids having either A2 or A4 cytoplasms, an experiment was conducted at the Indian Institute of Pulses Research (IIPR), Kanpur during 2008-2012. Four CMS lines namely Hy4A, H28A (each with A2 cytoplasm), ICP 2039A and ICP 2043A (both with A4 cytoplasm) were crossed with ten genotypes/restorers of long duration pigeonpea for two years. The F1 hybrids so-obtained were assessed in the succeeding years for pollen fertility and pod setting. All the pollinators except IPA 203 restored fertility in F1 hybrids derived from ICP 2039A and ICP 2043A (both having A4 cytoplasm). However, none of the restorers were effective in restoring fertility in hybrids derived from Hy4A and H28A (each with A2 cytoplasm). This could be ascribed to undesirable linkage drag still present in these two CMS lines having A2 cytoplasm. The F2 progenies derived from 4 hybrids (ICP 2039A × NA-1, ICP 2039A × Bahar, ICP 2043A × NA-1 and ICP 2043A × Bahar) segregated approximately into 3 fertile: 1 sterile plants. However, 2 F2 progenies having Pusa 9 as the restorer revealed approximately 15 fertile:1 sterile ratio. Thus monogenic and digenic duplicate gene action with complete dominance for fertility restoration was observed in F1 hybrids derived from CMS lines having A4 cytoplasm. F3 progenies from individual F2 plants of these crosses also confirmed the same pattern of fertility restoration. This study indicated that CMS lines based on A4 cytoplasm would be more desirable as these might have more number of restorers compared to those having A2 cytoplasm.

Share and Cite:

Choudhary, A. and Singh, I. (2015) A Study on Comparative Fertility Restoration in A2 and A4 Cytoplasms and Its Implication in Breeding Hybrid Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh]. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 6, 385-391. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2015.62044.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Choudhary, A.K., Kumar, S., Patil, B.S., Bhat, J.S., Sharma, M., Kemal, S., et al. (2013) Narrowing Yield Gaps through Genetic Improvement for Fusarium Wilt Resistance in Three Pulse Crops of the Semi-Arid Tropics. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics, 45, 341-370.
[2] Tikka, S.B.S., Parmer, L.D. and Chauhan, R.M. (1997) First Record of Cytoplasmic Genetic Male-Sterility in Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] through Wide Hybridization. Gujarat Agricultural University Research Journal, 22, 160-162.
[3] Saxena, K.B., Kumar, R.V., Srivastava, N. and Shiying, B. (2005) A Cytoplasmic-Genic Male-Sterility System Derived from a Cross between Cajanus cajanifolius and Cajanus cajan. Euphytica, 145, 291-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-1647-7
[4] Choudhary, A.K., Kumar, R.V. and Saxena, K.B. (2014) Red Gram Hybrids in India: A 40-Year Journey of Research. Indian Farming, 63, 11-13.
[5] De, D.N. (1974) Pigeonpea. In: Hutchinson, J., Ed., Evolutionary Studies in World Crops, Diversity and Change in the Indian Subcontinent, Cambridge University Press, London, 79-87.
[6] Saxena, K.B. (2008) Genetic Improvement of Pigeonpea—A Review. Tropical Plant Biology, 1, 159-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12042-008-9014-1
[7] Sawargaonkar, S.L., Madrap, I.A. and Saxena, K.B. (2012) Study of Inheritance of Fertility Restoration in Pigeonpea Lines Derived from Cajanus cajanifolius. Plant Breeding, 131, 312-314.
[8] Choudhary, A.K., Iquebal, M.A. and Nadarajan, N. (2012) Protogyny Is an Attractive Option over Emasculation for Hybridization in Pigeonpea. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics, 44, 138-148.
[9] Budar, F. and Pelletier, G. (2001) Male Sterility in Plants; Occurrence, Determinism, Significance and Use. Life Science, 324, 543-550.
[10] Dalvi, V.A., Saxena, K.B., Madrap, I.A. and Ravikoti, V.K. (2008) Cytogenetic Studies in A4 Cytoplasmic-Nuclear Male-Sterility System of Pigeonpea. Journal of Heredity, 99, 667-670.
[11] Dalvi, V.A., Saxena, K.B. and Madrap, I.A. (2008) Fertility Restoration in Cytoplasmic-Nuclear Male-Sterile Lines Derived from Three Wild Relatives of Pigeonpea. Journal of Heredity, 99, 671-673.
[12] Nadarajan, N., Ganesh, S. and Petchiammal, K.I. (2008) Fertility Restoration Studies in Short Duration Redgram [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Hybrids Involving CGMS System. Madras Agricultural Journal, 95, 320-327.
[13] Saxena, K.B. and Nadarajan, N. (2010) Prospects of Pigeonpea Hybrids in Indian Agriculture. Journal of Plant Breeding, 1, 107-117.
[14] Hossain, M.D., Singh, A.K. and Zamanb, F. (2010) Genetics of Fertility Restoration of WA-Based Cytoplasmic Male-Sterility System in Rice (Oryza sativa) Using Indica/Japonica Derivative Restorers. Science Asia, 36, 94-99.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.