Evaluation of Effectiveness of Diode Laser System (808 nm) versus Intense Pulse Light (IPL) in the Management of Unwanted Hair: A Split Face Comparative Study

Hayder R. AL-Hamamy; Anmar Z. Saleh; Zahra A. Rashed

doi:10.4236/ijmpcero.2015.41006

Home > Journals > Medicine & Healthcare | Physics & Mathematics > IJMPCERO

IJMPCERO> Vol.4 No.1, February 2015

Share This Article:

Open Access

Evaluation of Effectiveness of Diode Laser System (808 nm) versus Intense Pulse Light (IPL) in the Management of Unwanted Hair: A Split Face Comparative Study

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML

Download as PDF (Size:2688KB) PP. 41-48

DOI: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2015.41006 3,430 Downloads 4,582 Views Citations

Author(s) Leave a comment

Hayder R. AL-Hamamy¹, Anmar Z. Saleh², Zahra A. Rashed^2*

Affiliation(s)

¹Department of Dermatology and Venereology, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
²Department of Medical Physics, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

ABSTRACT

We have evaluated and compared the effectiveness of diode laser system (808 nm) and Intense Pulse Light (IPL) system (690 - 1200 nm) by studying the change in hair density, and the time of regrowth the hair. A total of 26 have completed three months’ treatment, aged 16 - 50 years. Patients were treated by diode laser 808 nm and IPL 690 - 1200 nm devices. Pulse repetition rate for both was 1 Hz and short pulse width for diode laser and the IPL pulse width was 15 ms. The fluence was (33 - 41 and 30 - 41) J/cm2 respectively. A split face treatment method was used. The treatment was carried out on monthly bases for three months. Hair density and regrowth duration were recorded before and after each session. After the third session, the hair density was decreased by (58%) for diode laser versus (49%) for IPL p = 0.366. The time of hair regrowth was increased to (327%) for diode laser versus IPL (339%) p = 0.821. Pain appeared more during the treatment with IPL than with diode laser. Post treatment side effects such as erythema, hyper pigmentation, and burn appeared on patients treated with diode laser more than those treated with IPL. In conclusion both diode laser and IPL were effective in reduction of hair density, and prolongation of the time of hair regrowth.

KEYWORDS

Unwanted Facial Hair, Diode Laser, IPL

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

AL-Hamamy, H. , Saleh, A. and Rashed, Z. (2015) Evaluation of Effectiveness of Diode Laser System (808 nm) versus Intense Pulse Light (IPL) in the Management of Unwanted Hair: A Split Face Comparative Study. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 4, 41-48. doi: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2015.41006.

References

[1]	Kamal T. (2006) Long-Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser and Intense Pulse Light Therapy for Idiopathic Facial Hirsutism. A Comparative Study. Journal of Pakistan Association of Dermatologists, 16, 205-209.

[2]	Lepselter, J. and Elman, M. (2004) Biological and Clinical Aspects in Laser Hair Removal. Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 15, 72-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546630310023152

[3]	Oakley, A.M.M. (2005) Hypertrichosis and Hirsutism. NZFP, 32, 106-109.

[4]	Swingler, R., Awala, A. and Gordon, U. (2009) Review Hirsutism in Young Women. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 11, 101-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1576/toag.11.2.101.27483

[5]	Sanchez, L.A., Perez, M. and Azziz, R. (2002) Laser Hair Reduction in the Hirsute Patient: A Critical Assessment. Human Reproduction Update, 8, 169-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/8.2.169

[6]	Kumar, G.S. and Narang, N. (2010) Hirstism—A Symptom Rather than a Disease: A Review. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, 1, 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5138/ijaps.2010.0976.1055.01001

[7]	Azziz, R. (2003) The Evaluation and Management of Hirsutism. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 101, 995-1007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02725-4

[8]	Oner, G.V., Eapen, V., Faure-Brac, G., Ward, P., Hazell, P., Barton, G., et al. (2012) Hirsutism: Diagnosis and Treatment. Journal of Metabolic Syndrome, 1, 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2167-0943.1000e104

[9]	Halachmi, S. and Lapidoth, M. (2012) Low-Fluence vs. Standard Fluence Hair Removal: A Contralateral Control Non-Inferiority Study. Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, 14, 2-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2011.634421

[10]	Cameron, H., Ibbotson, S.H., Dawe, R.S., Ferguson, J. and Moseley, H. (2008) Within-Patient Right-Left Blinded Comparison of Diode (810 nm) Laser Therapy and Intense Pulsed Light Therapy for Hair Removal. Lasers in Medical Science, 23, 393-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-007-0510-6

[11]	Sarkar, P. and Hirsch, R.J. (2010) Update on Laser Hair Removal. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 20, 440-444.

[12]	Lanigan, S.W. (2001) Management of Unwanted Hair in Females. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 26, 644-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2230.2001.00908.x

[13]	Lapidoth, M., Dierickx, C., Lanigan, S., Paasch, U., Campo-Voegeli, A., Dahan, S., et al. (2010) Best Practice Options for Hair Removal in Patients with Unwanted Facial Hair Using Combination Therapy with Laser: Guidelines Drawn up by an Expert Working Group. Dermatology, 221, 34-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000315499

[14]	Johnson, F. and Dovale, M. (1999) Intense Pulsed Light Treatment of Hirsutism: Case Reports of Skin Phototypes V and VI. Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, 1, 233-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14628839950516733

[15]	Babilas, P., Schreml, S., Szeimies, R.M. and Landthaler, M. (2010) Intense Pulsed Light (IPL): A Review. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 42, 93-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20877

[16]	Anderson, R.R. and Parrish, J.A. (1983) Selective Photothermolysis: Precise Microsurgery by Selective Absorption of Pulsed Radiation. Science, 220, 524-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.6836297

[17]	Lin, T.Y., Dierickx, C.C., Campos, V.B., Farinelli, W.A., Rosenthal, J. and Anderson, R.R. (2000) Reduction of Regrowing Hair Shaft Size and Pigmentation after Ruby and Diode Laser Treatment. Archives of Dermatological Research, 292, 60-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004030050011

[18]	Altshuler, G.B. and Yaroslavsky, I. (2004) Absorption Characteristics of Tissues as a Basis for the Optimal Wavelength Choice in Photodermatology. Palomar Medical Technologies, Burlington, 1-4.

[19]	Dierickx, C.C. (1999) Laser Hair Removal: Scientific Principles and Practical Aspects. Coherent Medical, USA, 1-8.

[20]	Patil, U.A. and Dhami, L.D. (2008) Overview of Lasers. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, 41, 101-113.

[21]	Welch, A.J., Torres, J.H. and Cheong, W.F. (1989) Laser Physics and Laser-Tissue Interaction. Texas Heart Institute Journal, 16, 141-149.

[22]	Amin, S.P. and Goldberg, D.J. (2006) Clinical Comparison of Four Hair Removal Lasers and Light Sources. Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, 8, 65-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14764170600717902

[23]	Haak, C.S., Nymann, P., Pedersen, A.T., Clausen, H.V., Feldt, R.U., Rasmussen, A.K., et al. (2010) Hair Removal in Hirsute Women with Normal Testosterone Levels: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Long-Pulsed Diode Laser vs. Intense Pulsed Light. British Journal of Dermatology, 163, 1007-1013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10004.x

[24]	Toosi, P., Sadighha, A., Sharifian, A. and Razavi, G.M. (2006) A Comparison Study of the Efficacy and Side Effects of Different Light Sources in Hair Removal. Lasers in Medical Science, 21, 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-006-0373-2