New Possible Astronomic Alignments at the Megalithic Site of Göbekli Tepe, Turkey


Gobekli Tepe is the oldest and one of the most important among the megalithic sites in the world. Its archaeoastronomical relevance has been recently evidenced by Collins (2013), according to whom the central pillars in four of the enclosures discovered in the site are oriented toward the setting point of the star Deneb (α Cyg), as this point moves in the course of the time, due to the equinox precession and the proper motion of the star. Taking into account these effects, Collins (2013) obtained an astronomical dating for the various enclosures which agrees rather well with the one obtained by Dietrich (2011) with the technique of carbon-14. In the present paper the careful evaluation of the effects caused by atmospheric extinction has enabled us to verify that the central pillars of the studied enclosures are in fact turned to face the setting point of Deneb, but these alignments occurred in epochs, still in agreement with the ones obtained by Dietrich (2011), but different from those proposed by Collins (2013). We have also individuated, for the first time, the probable astronomic alignments of two other enclosures at Gobekli Tepe, i.e. enclosures F and A. In particular, the first one seems to be oriented towards the rising point of the Sun on the day of the Harvest Festival, a day approximately halfway between the summer solstice and the autumn equinox. The second one, instead, shows an orientation towards the rising point of the Moon at its minor standstill. The positions of both celestial bodies have been obtained by extrapolating their declination to the date of the presumed construction reported by Dietrich (2011). A short discussion about the putative cultural motivations of these alignments is also presented.

Share and Cite:

De Lorenzis, A. and Orofino, V. (2015) New Possible Astronomic Alignments at the Megalithic Site of Göbekli Tepe, Turkey. Archaeological Discovery, 3, 40-50. doi: 10.4236/ad.2015.31005.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Belmonte, J. A., Shaltout, M., & Fekri, M. (2008). On the Orientation of Ancient Egyptian Temples: (4) Epilogue in Serabit el Khadem and Overview. Journal for the History of Astronomy, 39, 1-31.
[2] Calledda, P., & Proverbio, E. (2004). Analisi statistica degli orientamenti di tombe megalitiche in Sardegna. Rivista Italiana di Archeoastronomia, II, 45-65.
[3] Coffey, J. (2000). Some Moon Rhythms.
[4] Collins, A. (2013). Göbekli Tepe: Genesis of the Gods. Rochester: Inner Traditions, Bear and Co.
[5] De Lorenzis, A. (2011). Paleoastrometria stellare: Effetti della precessione dell’asse terrestre e dei moti propri. Bachelor’s Thesis in Physics, Lecce: University of Salento.
[6] De Lorenzis, A. (2013). Studio archeoastronomico del sito megalitico di Göbekli Tepe (Turchia). Master’sThesis in Physics, Lecce: University of Salento.
[7] Dietrich, O. (2011). Göbekli Tepe. In PPND—The Platform for Neolithic Radiocarbon Dates.
[8] Hale, R., & Collins, A. (2013). Göbekli Tepe and the Rebirth of Sirius.
[9] Horizons User Manual (2013). On-Line Version.
[10] Karttunen, P., Kröger, P., Oja, H., Poutanen, P. M., & Donner, K. J. (eds.) (2007). Fundamental Astronomy (5th ed.). Berlin: Springer.
[11] Keating, G. (1861). Keating’s General History of Ireland. Dublin: J. Duffy.
[12] Magli, G. (2009). Mysteries and Discoveries of Archaeoastronomy: From Giza to Easter Island. New York: Copernicus Books/Springer Science + Business Media: In Association with Praxis Pub.
[13] Magli, G. (2013). Sirius and the Project of the Megalithic Enclosures at Göbekli Tepe.
[14] North, J. (1996). Stonehenge: Neolithic Man and the Cosmos. New York: Harper Collins.
[15] Ruggles, C. L. N. (1985). The Linear Settings of Argyll and Mull. Journal for the History of Astronomy, 16, S105-S132.
[16] Ruggles, C. L. N. (2005). Ancient Astronomy: An Encyclopedia of Cosmologies and Myth. Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio.
[17] Ruggles, C. L. N., & Burl, H. A. W. (1985). A New Study of the Aberdeenshire Recumbent Stone Circles. 2: Interpretation. Journal for the History of Astronomy, 16, S25-S60.
[18] Salamini, F., Özkan, H., Brandolini, A., Schäfer-Pregl, R., & Martin, W. (2002). Genetics and Geography of Wild Cereal Domestication in the Near East. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 429-441.
[19] Schaefer, B. E. (1993). Astronomy and the Limits of Vision. Vistas in Astronomy, 36, 311-361.
[20] Schmidt, K. (2010). Göbekli Tepe—The Stone Age Sanctuaries. New Results of Ongoing Excavations with a Special Focus on Sculptures and High Reliefs. Documenta Praeheistorica, XXXVII, 239-256.
[21] Schoch, R. (2012). Forgotten Civilization. Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions, Bear and Co.
[22] Taylor, J. R. (1982). An Introduction to Error Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books.
[23] Thom, A. (1967). Megalithic Sites in Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[24] Thom, A. (1971). Preface: Megalithic Lunar Observatories. London: Oxford University Press.
[25] Thom, A. (1974). Astronomical Significance of Prehistoric Monuments in Western Europe. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 276, 149-156.
[26] Zedda, M., & Belmonte, J. (2004). On the Orientations of Sardinian Nuraghes: Some Clues to Their Interpretation. Journal for the History of Astronomy, 35, 85-107.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.