Daqing Oilfield Liquid Phase Underbalanced Drilling Improving Drilling Speed Evaluation Method

Shibin Li; Penghao Wang; Ligang Zhang

doi:10.4236/jmmce.2015.31005

Home > Journals > Chemistry & Materials Science | Engineering > JMMCE

JMMCE> Vol.3 No.1, January 2015

Share This Article:

Daqing Oilfield Liquid Phase Underbalanced Drilling Improving Drilling Speed Evaluation Method ()

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML

Download as PDF (Size:2530KB) PP. 37-40

DOI: 10.4236/jmmce.2015.31005 2,348 Downloads 2,747 Views

Author(s) Leave a comment

Shibin Li, Penghao Wang, Ligang Zhang

Affiliation(s)

Oil and Gas Well Engineering, College of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, China.

ABSTRACT

Factors affecting the drilling speed are very complex, such as formation factor (layers lithology, depth, porosity and reservoir pressure), fluid density, drilling parameters (bit pressure and speed), drill types, etc. Although liquid phase underbalanced drilling technology is to increase the penetration rate and shorten the drilling cycle, there is no evaluation model currently, so we cannot evaluate which factors can have a greater impact on speed. Based on the establishment of equivalent density and improvement of ROP (Rate of Penetration) calculation model, this paper is about the application of underbalanced drilling technology to improve drilling speed multiple sizes.

KEYWORDS

Liquid Phase under Balanced Drilling, Evaluation, Improving Drilling Speed, Multiple

Cite this paper

Li, S. , Wang, P. and Zhang, L. (2015) Daqing Oilfield Liquid Phase Underbalanced Drilling Improving Drilling Speed Evaluation Method. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 3, 37-40. doi: 10.4236/jmmce.2015.31005.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Qu, Y.Z., Sun, J.S. and Su, Y.N. (2006) Rapid Advances in Drilling Fluid Technology. Journal of Drilling Fluid and Completion Fluid, 23, 68-70.

[2]	Sugden, S. (1922) Determination of Surface Tension from the Maximum Pressure in Bubbles. Journal of the Chemical Society, 121, 858-866. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/ct9222100858

[3]	Sun, J.S., Yang, Y.P. and An, S.M. (2009) Improve the Penetration Rate of Drilling Fluid Theory and Technology Research. Journal of Drilling Fluid and Completion Fluid, 26, 12-15.

[4]	Li, Z.G. (2011) The Best Method of Optimization Design of Rate of Penetration. Journal of Drilling Technology, 34, 14-16.

[5]	Fan, X.Y., et al. (2007) Based on Seismic Data of Drilling Rate Prediction Research. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Geology and Development, 26, 121-124.

[6]	Gao, C.L. and He, Y.R. (1992) Use the Multiple Regression Analysis Method to Establish Deep Well Drilling Rate Equa- tion. Journal of Drilling Technology, 20, 30-32.

[7]	Grocock, F.B., Sinor, L.A., et al. (1994) Innovative Additives Can Increase the Drilling Rates of Water-Based Muds. Society of Petroleum Engineers 28708.

[8]	Li, H.Q., Gao, C.L. and Ren, Y.X. (1995) Pressure Difference on the Influence Law of Rate of Penetration. Journal of Drilling Technology, 19, 10-15.

[9]	Lin, Y.H., Bao, Y.Y., Liang, Z., et al. (2004) Oil Drilling Mechanical Drilling Rate Prediction Research Progress. Oil Drill- ing Technology, 32, 10-13.

[10]	William, D., Ken, D., et al. (2005) New Water-Based Mud Balances High-Performance Drilling and Environmental. Society of Petroleum Engineers 92367.