Study of Work-Travel Related Behavior Using Principal Component Analysis

Cira Souza Pitombo, Monique Martins Gomes

Department of Transportation Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.

DOI: 10.4236/ojs.2014.411084                

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to analyze work travel-related behavior through a set of variables relative to socio-economic class, urban environment and travel characteristics. The Principal Component Analysis was applied in a sample consisting of workers of the S?o Paulo Metropolitan Area, based on the origin-destination home interview survey, carried out in 1997, in order to: 1) examine the interdependence between travel patterns and a set of socioeconomic and urban environment variables; 2) determine if the original database can be synthetized on components. The results enabled to observe relations between the individual’s socio-economic class and car usage, characteristics of urban environment and destination choices, as well as age and non-motorized travel mode choice. It is then concluded that the database can be adequately summarized in three components for subsequent analysis: 1) urban environment; 2) socio-economic class; and 3) family structure.

Keywords

Travel Behavior, Principal Component Analysis, Exploratory Analysis

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Lu, X. and Pas, I. (1998) Socio-Demographics, Activity Participation and Travel Behavior. Transportation Research Part A, 33, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00020-2
[2]	Strambi, O., Vespucci, K.M. and Van de Bilt, K. (2004) Analysis of the Evolution of Classes of Individual Patterns and Their Relation to Socio-Demographic and Economic Variables. 83rd Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board. CD-ROM. Washington DC.
[3]	Mcguckin, N. and Murakami, E. (1999) Examining Trip-Chaining Behavior: Comparison of Travel by Men and Women. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1693, Transportation Reasearch Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 79-85. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3141/1693-12
[4]	Recker, W.W. (1995) The Household Activity Pattern Problem: General Formulation and Solution. Transportation Research Part B, 29, 61-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(94)00023-S.
[5]	Ye, X., Pendyala, R.M. and Gottardi, G. (2007) An Exploration of the Relationship between Mode Choice and Complexity of Trip Chaining Patterns. Transportation Research Part B, 41, 96-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2006.03.004
[6]	Bhat, C.R., Sivakumar. A. and Axhausen, K.W. (2003) An Analysis of the Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Non-Maintenance Shopping Activities. Transportation Research Part B, 37, 857-881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(02)00062-0
[7]	Strathman, J.G., Dueker, K.J. and Davis, J.S. (1994) Effect of Household Structure and Selected Travel Characteristics on Tripchaining. Transportation, 21, 23-45. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/BF01119633
[8]	Krikey, K. (2003) Neighborhood Services, Trip Purpose and Tour-Based Travel. Transportation, 30, 387-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024768007730
[9]	Primerano, F., Taylor, M.A.P., Pitaksringkarn, L. and Tisato, P. (2008) Defining and Understanding Trip Chaining Behavior. Transportation, 35, 55-72. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11116-007-9134-8
[10]	Hanson S. and Hanson, P. (1981) The Travel-Activity Patterns of Urban Residents: Dimensions and Relationships to Sociodemographic Characteristics. Economic Geography, 57, 332-347.
[11]	Mitchell, C.G.B. and Town, S.W. (1977) Accessibility of Various Social Groups to Different Activities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington DC, 31 p.
[12]	Doubleday, C. (1997) Some Studies of the Temporal Stability of Person Trip Generation Models. Transportation Research, 11, 255-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0041-1647(77)90091-0
[13]	Kitamura, R. (1985) Trip Chaining in a Linear City. Transportation Research Part A, 17, 155-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(85)90023-8
[14]	Dargay, J. (2012) The Prospects for Longer Distance Domestic Coach, Rail, Air and Car Travel in Britain. Report to the Independent Transport Commission. http://www.trg.soton.ac.uk/itc/ldt_main.pdf
[15]	Lee, Y., Hickman, M. and Washington, S. (2007) Household Type and Structure, Time-Use Pattern, and Trip-Chaining Behavior. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41, 1004-1020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2007.06.007
[16]	Newman, P. and Kenworthy, J. (1989) Gasoline Consumption and Cities: A Comparison of US Cities with a Global Survey. APA Journal, 55, 23-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944368908975398
[17]	Cervero, R. and Radisch, C. (1996) Pedestrian versus Automobile Oriented Neighborhoods. Transport Policy, 3, 127-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0967-070X(96)00016-9
[18]	Handy, S. (1993) Regional versus Local Accessibility: Implications for Non-Work Travel. Transportation Research Record, 58-66.
[19]	Aditjandra, P.T., Cao, X. and Mulley, C. (2012) Understanding Neighborhood Design Impact on Travel Behavior: An Application of Structural Equations Model to a British Metropolitan Data. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46, 22-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.001
[20]	Field, A. (2005) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 2nd Edition, SAGE Publications Ltd., Los Angeles, London, New Delphi, Singapore, Washington DC.
[21]	Johnson, R.A. and Wichern, D.W. (1992) Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
[22]	Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A. and Stone, C.J. (1984) Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth International Group, Belmont.