Share This Article:

Optimizing the PMCC Algorithm for Infrasound and Seismic Nuclear Treaty Monitoring

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:5058KB) PP. 204-213
DOI: 10.4236/oja.2014.44020    4,337 Downloads   5,071 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

We introduce novel methods to determine optimum detection thresholds for the Progressive Multi-Channel Correlation (PMCC) algorithm used by the International Data Centre (IDC) to perform infrasound and seismic station-level nuclear-event detection. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis is used with real ground truth data to determine the trade-off between the probability of detection (PD) and the false alarm rate (FAR) at various detection thresholds. Further, statistical detection theory via maximum a posteriori and Bayes cost approaches is used to determine station-level optimum “family” size thresholds before detections should be considered for network-level processing. These threshold-determining methods are extensible for family-characterizing statistics other than “size,” such as a family’s collective F-statistic or signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Therefore, the reliability of analysts’ decisions as to whether families should be preserved for network-level processing can only benefit from access to multiple, independent, optimum decision thresholds based upon size, F-statistic, SNR, etc.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Runco Jr., A. , Louthain, J. and Clauter, D. (2014) Optimizing the PMCC Algorithm for Infrasound and Seismic Nuclear Treaty Monitoring. Open Journal of Acoustics, 4, 204-213. doi: 10.4236/oja.2014.44020.

References

[1] Cansi, Y. and Le Pichon, A. (2009) Infrasound Event Detection Using the Progressive Multi-Channel Correlation Algorithm. Handbook of Signal Processing in Acoustics, Springer, New York, 1425-1435.
[2] Shumway, R.H., Kim, S.-E. and Blandford, R.R. (1999) Nonlinear Estimation for Time Series Observed on Arrays. Asymptotics, Nonparametrics, and Time Series, Marcel Dekker, New York, 227-258.
[3] Cansi, Y. and Klinger, Y. (1997) An Automated Data Processing Method for Mini-Arrays. European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre, Bruyères-le-Chatel.
[4] Le Pichon, A. and Cansi, Y. (2003) PMCC for Infrasound Data Processing. InfraMatics, 2, 1-9.
[5] Le Pichon, A. and Cansi, Y. (2003) Progressive Multi-Channel Correlation: Technical Documentation. CTBTO, Vienna.
[6] Arrowsmith, S., Whitaker, R., Taylor, S., Burlaeu, R., Stump, B., Hedlin, M., Randall, G., Hayward, C. and ReVelle, D. (2008) Regional Monitoring of Infrasound Events Using Multiple Arrays: Application to Utah and Washington State. Geophysical Journal International, 175, 291-300.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03912.x
[7] Green, D.N. and Bowers, D. (2010) Estimating the Detection Capability of the International Monitoring System Infrasound Network. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115, D18.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014017
[8] Le Pichon, A., Blanc, E. and Hauchecorne, A., Eds. (2010) Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies. Springer, New York.
[9] Sklar, B. and Ray, P.K. (2009) Digital Communications: Fundamentals and Applications. Pearson, New York.
[10] Kay, S.M. (1998) Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Detection Theory. Vol. 2, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.