Quantum Effects from a Simple Card Game

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:2480KB) PP. 1999-2002
DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2014.518195    3,408 Downloads   3,963 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

A well-known, classical conundrum, which is related to conditional probability, has heretofore only been used for games and puzzles. It is shown here, both empirically and formally, that the counterintuitive phenomenon in question has consequences that are far more profound, especially for physics. A simple card game the reader can play at home demonstrates the counterintuitive phenomenon, and shows how it gives rise to hidden variables. These variables are “hidden” in the sense that they belong to the past and no longer exist. A formal proof shows that the results are due to the duration of what can be thought of as a gambler’s bet, without loss of generalization. The bet is over when it is won or lost, analogous to the collapse of a wave function. In the meantime, new and empowering information does not change the original probabilities. A related thought experiment involving a pregnant woman demonstrates that macroscopic systems do not always have states that are completely intrinsic. Rather, the state of a macroscopic system may depend upon how the experiment is set up and how the system is measured even though no wave functions are involved. This obviously mitigates the chasm between the quantum mechanical and the classical.

Cite this paper

Allen, A. (2014) Quantum Effects from a Simple Card Game. Journal of Modern Physics, 5, 1999-2002. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2014.518195.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Shimojo, S. and Ichikawa, S. (1989) Cognition, 32, 1-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(89)90012-7
[2] Faulk, R. (1992) Cognition, 43, 197-223.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90012-7
[3] Bar-Hillel, M. (1989) Philosophy of Science, 56, 348-358.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/289493
[4] Gorroochurn, P. (2012) Bertrand’s Strange Three Boxes. In: Classical Problems of Probability, Wiley, Hoboken.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118314340.ch18
[5] Rosenhouse, J. (2009) The Monty Hall Problem. Oxford University Press, NY.
[6] Fernandez, L. and Piron, R. (1999) Mathematics Magazine, 72, 214-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2690884
[7] Allen, A.D. (2015) How to Get Lucky. Publish Green, Minneapolis.
[8] Zurek, W. (2014) Physics Today, 67, 44-50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.2550

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.