The Metaphor of Patina
Manuel Ortega-Calvo1,2, José Manuel Santos-Lozano1,2, José Lapetra1,2, Jordi Salas-Salvadó2,3, Miguel Angel Martínez-González2,4, Rosa Lamuela-Raventós2,5, Ramón Estruch2,6
1Department of Family Medicine, Distrito Sanitario de Atención Primaria de Sevilla, Sevilla, España.
2CIBER de la Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y de la Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España.
3Human Nutrition Unit, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain.
4Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
5Department of Nutrition and Food Science, School of Pharmacy, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
6Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2014.44064   PDF   HTML   XML   4,181 Downloads   5,436 Views   Citations

Abstract

Patina is the word used for the green or brown film formed on the surface of old bronze, an excess of which can mask the true characteristics of the original masterpiece. Filippo Baldinucci used the word patina in a modern sense for first time in his book “Tuscan Vocabulary of the Art of Design”. Metaphors have been part of philosophical speech since the time of Plato. This figure of speech is used to attempt to provide a sensitive presence of an idea to improve understanding and to make a more vivid perception of that concept. On analysing the creative process of contemporary research on health topics and its further dissemination, we defend the epistemological thesis that there is always some degree of patina on an original article and this may obscure the underlying scientific work. Conclusion: We consider that patina in scientific papers is very different from the concept of epidemiological bias. We think that any researcher who reads an original article acts as a restorer of knowledge. If a reader is aware of the existence of scientific patina, that reader will know how to look through it and see the masterpiece hidden underneath.

Share and Cite:

Ortega-Calvo, M. , Santos-Lozano, J. , Lapetra, J. , Salas-Salvadó, J. , Martínez-González, M. , Lamuela-Raventós, R. and Estruch, R. (2014) The Metaphor of Patina. Open Journal of Philosophy, 4, 623-627. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2014.44064.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Albert, T. (2000). Winning the Publications Game. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press.
[2] Berghmans, R., & Schouten, H. C. (2011). Sir Karl Popper, Swans, and the General Practitioner. BMJ, 343, d5469.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5469
[3] Black, M. (1962). Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. Madrid: Cornell University Press.
[4] Delgado-Rodríguez, M., & Llorca, J. (2004). Bias. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58, 635-641.
http://jech.bmj.com/content/58/8/635.full.pdf+html
[5] Fontanier, P. (1968). Les figures du discours. Paris: Flammarion.
[6] González-García, L., Chemello, C., García-Sánchez, F. et al. (2012). Aphorisms and Short Phrases as Pieces of Knowledge in the Pedagogical Framework of Them Andalusian School of Public Health. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 3, 197-210.
http://ijpm.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ijpm/article/view/288/405
[7] Greenhalgh, T. (1997). Assessing the Methodological Quality of Published Papers. BMJ, 315, 305-308.
http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7103/305?view=long&pmid=9274555
[8] Guarner, F., Hooper, L. V., & Núñez, G. (2013). Understanding Microbiota in the midst of Renaissance Architecture and Olive Groves. Nature Immunology, 271, 66-71.
[9] Ho, R. C., Mak, K. K., Tao, R., Lu, Y., Day, J. R., & Pan, F. (2013). Views on the Peer Review System of Biomedical Journals: An Online Survey of Academics from High-Ranking Universities. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 74.
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/13/74
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-74
[10] Wikipedia (2013)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filippo_Baldinucci
[11] Wikipedia (2014)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunning_fog_index
[12] http://gunning-fog-index.com/
[13] Losee, J. (1988). A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[14] Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G. et al. (2004). Realist Synthesis: An Introduction. ESRC Research Methods Programme, University of Manchester. RMP Methods Paper 2.
http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/methods/publications/RMPmethods2.pdf
[15] Phillips, C. V. (2004). Publication Bias in Situ. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, 20.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC514545/pdf/1471-2288-4-20.pdf
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-20
[16] Ramírez-Puerta, M. R., Fernández-Fernández, R., Frías-Pareja, J. C., Yuste-Ossorio, M. E., Narbona-Galdó, S., & Peñas- Maldonado, L. (2013). Analysis of Informed Consent Readibility in Intensive Care. Medicina Intensiva, 37, 503-509. (Spanish)
http://www.medintensiva.org/es/analisis-legibilidad-consentimientos-informados-cuidados/articulo/S0210569112002720/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2012.08.013
[17] Richards, I. A. (1936). The Philosophy of the Rethoric. New York: O.U.P.
[18] Shattschneider, D. (1994). Escher’s Metaphors. Scientific American, 220, 44-49.
[19] Steiner, G. (2001). Grammars of Creation. London: Faber and Faber.
[20] Sutherland, W. J., Spiegelhalter, D., & Burgman, M. A. (2013). Policy: Twenty Tips for Interpreting Scientific Claims. Nature, 503, 335-337.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/503335a
[21] Young, N. S., Ioannidis, J. P., & Al-Ubaydli, O. (2008). Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science. PLoS Medicine, 5, e201.
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0050201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050201

Copyright © 2021 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.