Respiratory Volume Monitoring to Assess the Effect of Airway Maneuvers on Ventilation during Upper Endoscopy

DOI: 10.4236/ojanes.2014.411041   PDF   HTML   XML   2,535 Downloads   3,028 Views   Citations

Abstract

Introduction: Propofol use during endoscopic procedures has become increasingly popular and assessing and maintaining airway patency is a significant challenge. Anesthesiologists often use airway maneuvers to maintain airway patency and ventilation during procedural sedation. A novel, non-invasive, Respiratory Volume Monitor (RVM) that provided continuous, real-time measurements of minute ventilation (MV), tidal volume (TV) and respiratory rate (RR) was used to monitor respiratory performance before, during, and after endoscopic procedures, quantify MV changes before and after airway maneuvers, and to quantify propofol-induced respiratory depression. Methods: RVM traces were obtained from 25 patients undergoing sedation for endoscopic procedures. Airway maneuvers were performed in 19/25 patients. All 25 patients received propofol as the primary sedative. Results: Forty-five airway maneuvers were performed. During these maneuvers, all respiratory parameters increased relative to pre-maneuver levels. On average, MV increased by 24% ± 5% (mean ± SEM), TV 14% ± 5% and RR: 17% ± 6%. The cohort average MVBASELINE was 9.5 ± 0.7 L/min (TV = 670 ± 60 ml, RR = 15 ± 0.7). Following propofol MV decreased transiently, reaching nadir five minutes after the last dose of propofol at 82% ± 10% of baseline (MV = 7.5 ± 1.0 L/min). The reduction in MV was driven by reduction in TV, not RR. Conclusions: Data demonstrated that RVM was able to track changes in ventilation and was able to quantify respiratory changes following airway maneuvers. All patients had a significant reduction in ventilatory volumes after propofol. Five minutes after the last dose of propofol, MV and TV were significantly reduced while RR was not, suggesting that monitoring respiratory rate alone was not a sufficient indicator of respiratory status.

Share and Cite:

Holley, K. , Mathews, D. , Ladd, D. , Campana, L. and Schapiro, H. (2014) Respiratory Volume Monitoring to Assess the Effect of Airway Maneuvers on Ventilation during Upper Endoscopy. Open Journal of Anesthesiology, 4, 281-290. doi: 10.4236/ojanes.2014.411041.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Seeff, L.C., Richards, T.B., Shapiro, J.A., et al. (2004) How Many Endoscopies Are Performed for Colorectal Cancer Screening? Results from CDC’s Survey of Endoscopic Capacity. Gastroenterology, 127, 1670-1677.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.051
[2] American Society for Gastrointestinal Surgery (2002) Guidelines for the Use of Deep Sedation and Anesthesia for GI Endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 56, 613-617.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70104-1
[3] Mackenzie, N. and Grant, I.S. (1987) Propofol for Intravenous Sedation. Anaesthesia, 42, 3-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb02936.x
[4] Faulx, A.L., Vela, S., Das, A., et al. (2005) The Changing Landscape of Practice Patterns Regarding Unsedated Endoscopy and Propofol Use: A National Web Survey. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 62, 9-15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(05)00518-3
[5] Hillman, D.R., Platt, P.R. and Eastwood, P.R. (2003) Upper Airway during Anesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 91, 31-39.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeg126
[6] Taylor, M.B., Grounds, R.M., Mulrooney, P.D. and Morgan, M. (1986) Ventilatory Effects of Propofol during Induction of Anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 41, 816-820.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1986.tb13123.x
[7] Goodman, N.W., Black, A.M.S. and Carter, J.A. (1987) Some Ventilatory Effects of Propofol as a Sole Anaesthetic Agent. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 59, 1497-1503.
[8] Cote, G.A., Hovis, R.M., Ansstas, M.A., et al. (2010) Incidence of Sedation-Related Complications with Propofol Use during Advanced Endoscopic Procedures. Clinical Gasterenterology and Hepatology, 8, 137-142.
[9] Overdyk, F.J., Carter, R., Maddox, R.R., Callura, J., Herrin, A.E., et al. (2007) Continuous Oximetry/Capnometry Monitoring Reveals Frequent Desaturation and Bradypnea during Patient-Controlled Analgesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 105, 412-418.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000269489.26048.63
[10] Voscopoulos, C., Brayanov, J., Ladd, D., Lalli, M., Panasyuk, A., et al. (2013) Evaluation of a Novel Non-Invasive Respiration Monitor Providing Continuous Measurement of Minute Ventilation in Ambulatory Subjects in a Variety of Clinical Scenarios. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 117, 91-100.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182918098
[11] Du Bois, D. and Du Bois, E.F. (1916) A Formula to Estimate the Approximate Surface Area if Height and Weight Be Known. Archives of Internal Medicine, 17, 863-871.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1916.00080130010002
[12] American Academy of Respiratory Care Protocol Committee (2003) AARC: Adult Mechanical Ventilator Protocols.
http://www.aarc.org/resources/protocol_resources/documents/general_vent.pdf
[13] Metzner, J. and Domino, K. (2011) Risk of Anesthesia Care in Remote Locations. APSF Newsletter.
http://www.apsf.org/newsletters/html/2011/spring/06_remotelocation.htm
[14] American Society of Anesthesiologists (2010) Standards for Basic Anesthetic Monitoring.
http://www.asahq.org/For-Healthcare-Professionals/Standards-
Guidelines-and-Statements.aspx
[15] Mimoz, O., Bernard, T., Gaucher, A., Fransca, D. and Debaene, B. (2012) Accuracy of Respiratory Rate Monitoring Using a Non-Invasive Acoustic Method after General Anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 108, 872-875.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer510
[16] Ramsay, M., Usman, M., Lagow, E., Mendoza, M., Untalan, E., et al. (2013) The Accuracy, Precision and Reliability of Measuring Ventilatory Rate and Detecting Ventilatory Pause by Rainbow Acoustic Monitoring and Capnometry. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 117, 69-75.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e318290c798

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.