Spray-Dry Agglomerated Nanoparticles in Ordinary Portland Cement Matrix

Tapio Vehmas, Ulla Kanerva, Erika Holt

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.

DOI: 10.4236/msa.2014.512084                

Abstract

Nano-sized particles have got a focus of great interest for the past decade. These ultrafine particles can have an effect in multiple ways on concrete technology. Although most of the effects of nanoparticles are desired, a huge surface area introduced by nanoparticles also incorporates negative effects, such as loss of workability and safety aspects. Agglomeration of nano-sized particles by spray-drying is one potential method to overcome the negative effects. In this study, ultra-fine material was dispersed and agglomerated successfully. Agglomerate structure was analyzed and performance was evaluated with mortar samples. Agglomerated nano-sized material had micron-sized inner porosity, which enabled water penetration into the agglomerates. In water exposure, agglomerates did not dissolve although some of binder glue and dispersing agent leaked out. Water penetration and organic material leaking enabled high reactivity and workability of the agglomerated nanoparticles. In spite of the high reactivity of agglomerated nanoparticles, slightly lower final compression strengths were observed with agglomerated ultrafine particles. The results of this study can be used in concrete technology when further developing admixture technologies and recipe designs. The negative side-effects of the agglomerated nanoparticles can be overcome and accounted for within application areas.

Keywords

Concrete, Nanoparticles, Spray-Drying

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Maynard, A.D. (2006) Nanotechnology: Assessing the Risks. Nano Today, 1, 22-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1748-0132(06)70045-7
[2]	Maynard, A.D. (2007) Nanotechnology: The Next Big Thing, or Much Ado about Nothing? Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 51, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mel071
[3]	Sanchez, F. and Sobolev, K. (2010) Nanotechnology in Concrete—A Review. Construction and Building Materials, 24, 2060-2071. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.014
[4]	Pacheco-Torgal, F. and Jalali, S. (2011) Nanotechnology: Advantages and Drawbacks in the Field of Construction and Building Materials. Construction and Building Materials, 25, 582-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.009
[5]	Li, G.Y., Wang, P.M. and Zhao, X. (2005) Mechanical Behavior and Microstructure of Cement Composites Incorporating Surface-Treated Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Carbon, 43, 1239-1245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2004.12.017
[6]	Li, G.Y., Wang, P.M. and Zhao, X. (2007) Pressure-Sensitive Properties and Microstructure of Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Cement Composites. Cement and Concrete Composites, 29, 377-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.12.011
[7]	Ibusuki, T. and Takeuchi, K. (1994) Removal of Low Concentration Nitrogen Oxides through Photoassisted Heterogeneous Catalysis. Journal of Molecular Catalysis, 88, 93-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-5102(93)E0247-E
[8]	Ballari, M.M., Hunger, M., Hasken, G. and Brouwers, H.J.H. (2010) NOx Photocatalytic Degradation Employing Concrete Pavement Containing Titanium Dioxide. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 95, 245-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.01.002
[9]	Sato, T. and Diallo, F. (2010) Seeding Effect of Nano-CaCO3 on the Hydration of Tricalcium Silicate. Journal of the Transportation Research Record, 2141, 61-67.
[10]	Mondal, P., Shah, S., Marks, L. and Gaitero, J. (2010) Comparative Study of the Effects of Microsilica and Nanosilica in Concrete. Transportation Research Record, 2141, 6-9.
[11]	Cassar, L. (2004) Photocatalysis of Cementitious Materials: Clean Buildings and Clean Air. MRS Bulletin, 5, 328-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/mrs2004.99
[12]	Stark, J., Moser, B. and Bellmann, F. (2007) Nucleation and Growth of C-S-H Phases on Mineral Admixtures. Advances in Construction Materials, 531-538.
[13]	Blyszko, J., Kiernozycki, W., Guskos, N., Zolnierkiewicz, G., Typek, J., Narkiewicz, U. and Podsiadly, M. (2008) Study of Mechanical Properties of Concrete with Low Concentration of Magnetic Nanoparticles. Journal of Non Crystalline Solids, 354, 4515-4518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.06.101
[14]	Nazari, A. and Riahi, S. (2010) Assessment of the Effects of Fe2O3 Nanoparticles on Water Permeability, Workability, and Setting Time of Concrete. Journal of Composite Materials, 45, 923-930. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021998310377945
[15]	Donaldson, K., Stone, V., Clouter, A., Renwick, L. and MacNee, W. (2001) Ultrafine Particles. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 58, 211-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.58.3.211
[16]	Shaw, F. and Andrews, M. (1997) Spray Drying, Carbide, Nitride and Boride Materials Synthesis and Processing. Chapman & Hall, London.
[17]	Harris, D.C. (2003) Quantitative Chemical Analysis. 6th Edition, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
[18]	TCE1 (1997) Adiabatic and Semi-Adiabatic Calorimetry to Determine the Temperature Increase in Concrete Due to Hydration Heat of the Cement. Materials and Structures, 30, 451-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02524773
[19]	Darr, G.M. and Ludwig, U. (1973) Determination of Permeable Porosity. Materials and Structures, 6, 185.
[20]	Rostasy, F.S., Weib, R. and Wiedemann, G. (1980) Changes of Pore Structure of Cement Mortar due Temperature. Cement and Concrete Research, 10, 157-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(80)90072-1
[21]	Kumar, R. and Bhattacharjee, B. (2003) Porosity, Pore Size Distribution and In-Situ Strength of Concrete. Cement and concrete research, 33, 155-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00942-0.