An Efficient Liver-Segmentation System Based on a Level-Set Method and Consequent Processes

Walita Narkbuakaew; Hiroshi Nagahashi; Kota Aoki; Yoshiki Kubota

doi:10.4236/jbise.2014.712097

Home > Journals > Biomedical & Life Sciences > JBiSE

JBiSE> Vol.7 No.12, October 2014

Share This Article:

Open Access

An Efficient Liver-Segmentation System Based on a Level-Set Method and Consequent Processes

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML

Download as PDF (Size:4053KB) PP. 994-1004

DOI: 10.4236/jbise.2014.712097 5,426 Downloads 5,969 Views Citations

Author(s) Leave a comment

Walita Narkbuakaew¹, Hiroshi Nagahashi², Kota Aoki², Yoshiki Kubota³

Affiliation(s)

¹Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Kanagawa, Japan.
²Imaging Science and Engineering Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Kanagawa, Japan.
³Gunma University Heavy-Ion Medical Center, Gunma, Japan.

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an efficient liver-segmentation system developed by combining three ideas under the operations of a level-set method and consequent processes. First, an effective initial process creates mask and seed regions. The mask regions assist in prevention of leakage regions due to an overlap of gray-intensities between liver and another soft-tissue around ribs and verte-brae. The seed regions are allocated inside the liver to measure statistical values of its gray-intensities. Second, we introduce liver-corrective images to represent statistical regions of the liver and preserve edge information. These images help a geodesic active contour (GAC) to move without obstruction from high level of image noises. Lastly, the computation time in a level-set based on reaction-diffusion evolution and the GAC method is reduced by using a concept of multi-resolution. We applied the proposed system to 40 sets of 3D CT-liver data, which were acquired from four patients (10 different sets per patient) by a 4D-CT imaging system. The segmentation results showed 86.38% ± 4.26% (DSC: 91.38% ± 2.99%) of similarities to outlines of manual delineation provided by a radiologist. Meanwhile, the results of liver segmentation only using edge images presented 79.17% ± 5.15% or statistical regions showed 74.04% ± 9.77% of similarities.

KEYWORDS

Liver Segmentation, Level-Set, Geodesic Active Contour, Speed Images, Statistical Thresholds

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Narkbuakaew, W. , Nagahashi, H. , Aoki, K. and Kubota, Y. (2014) An Efficient Liver-Segmentation System Based on a Level-Set Method and Consequent Processes. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 7, 994-1004. doi: 10.4236/jbise.2014.712097.

References

[1]	Nakayama, Y., Li, Q., Katsuragawa, S., Ikeda, R., Hiai, Y., Awai, K., Kusunoki, S., Yamashita, Y., Okajima, H., Inomata, Y., et al. (2006) Automated Hepatic Volumetry for Living Related Liver Transplantation at Multisection CT 1. Radiology, 240, 743-748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2403050850

[2]	Jiang, S.B. (2006) Radiotherapy of Mobile Tumors. Seminars in Radiation Oncology, 16, 239-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2006.04.007

[3]	Campadelli, P., Casiraghi, E. and Esposito, A. (2009) Liver Segmentation from computed Tomography Scans: A Survey and a New Algorithm. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 45, 185-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2008.07.020

[4]	Heimann, T., van Ginneken, B., Styner, M.A., et al. (2009) Comparison and Evaluation of Method for Liver Segmentation from CT Datasets. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 28, 1251-1264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2009.2013851

[5]	Mharib, A.M., Ramli, A.R., Mashohor, S. and Mahmood, R.B. (2012) Survey on Liver CT Image Segmentation Methods. Artificial Intelligence Review, 37, 83-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9220-3

[6]	Lee, J., Kim, N., Lee, H., Seo, J.B., Won, H.J., Shin, Y.M., Shin, Y.G. and Kim, S.-H. (2007) Efficient Liver Segmentation Using a Level-Set Method with Optimal Detection of the Initial Liver Boundary from Level-Set Speed Images. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 88, 26-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.07.005

[7]	Casciaro, S., Franchini, R., Massoptier, L., Casciaro, E., Conversano, F., Malvasi, A. and Lay-Ekuakille, A. (2012) Fully Automatic Segmentations of liver and Hepatic Tumors from 3-D Computed Tomography Abdominal Images: Comparative Evaluation of Two Automatic Methods. IEEE Sensors Journal, 12, 464-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2011.2108281

[8]	Whitaker, R.T. and Xue, X. (2001) Variable-Conductance, Level-Set Curvature for Image Denoising. Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing, 7-10 October 2001, Thessaloniki, 142-145.

[9]	Massoptier, L. and Casciaro, S. (2007) Fully Automatic Liver Segmentation through Graph-Cut Technique. Proceeding of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Lyon, 23-26 August 2007, 5243-5246.

[10]	Comaniciu, D. and Meer, P. (2002) Mean Shift: A Robust Approach toward Feature Space Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24, 603-619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/34.1000236

[11]	Osher, S. and Sethian, J.A. (1988) Fronts Propagating with Curvature-Dependent Speed: Algorithms Based on Hamilton-Jacobi Formulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 79, 12-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2

[12]	Zhang, K.H., Zhang, L., Song, H.H. and Zhang, D. (2013) Reinitializaion-Free Level Set Evolution via Reaction Diffusion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 22, 258-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2012.2214046

[13]	Li, C.M., Xu, C.Y., Gui, C.F. and Fox, M.D. (2005) Level Set Evolution without Re-Initialization: A New Variational Formulation. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1, 430-436.

[14]	Li, C.M., Xu, C.Y., Gui, C.F. and Fox, M.D. (2010) Distance Regularized Level Set Evolution and Its Application to Image Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 19, 3243-3254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2010.2069690

[15]	Merriman, B., Bence, J.K. and Osher, S.J. (1994) Motion of Multiple Junctions: A Level Set Approach. Journal of Computational Physics, 112, 334-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1994.1105

[16]	Caselles, V., Kimmel, R. and Sapiro, G. (1997) Geodesic Active Contours. International Journal of Computer Vision, 22, 61-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007979827043

[17]	Huang, D.Y., Lin, T.W. and Hu, W.C. (2011) Automatic Multilevel Thresholding Based on Two-Stage Otsu’s Method with Cluster Determination by Valley Estimation. ICIC International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 7, 5631-5644.

[18]	Otsu, N. (1979) A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics, 9, 62-66.

[19]	Hu, Q.M., Hou, Z.J. and Nowinski, W.L. (2006) Supervised Range-Constrained Thresholding. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15, 228-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2005.860348

[20]	Qiao, Y., Hu, Q.M., Qian, G.Y., Luo, S.H. and Nowinski, W.L. (2007) Thresholding Based on Variance and Intensity Contrast. Pattern Recognition, 40, 596-608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2006.04.027

[21]	Xu, X.Y., Xu, S.Z., Jin, L.H. and Song, E. (2011) Characteristic Analysis of Otsu Threshold and Its Applications. Pattern Recognition Letters, 32, 956-961. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2011.01.021

[22]	Smith, N.B. and Webb, A. (2010) Introduction to Medical Imaging: Physics, Engineering and Clinical Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760976

[23]	Dice, L.R. (1945) Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association between Species. Ecology, 26, 297-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1932409

[24]	Balafar, M. (2011) Spatial Based Expectation Maximizing (EM). Diagnostic Pathology, 6, 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-6-103