Conformity of Witnesses with Low Self-Esteem to Their Co-Witnesses

Tomoka Tainaka¹, Tomoko Miyoshi¹, Kazuo Mori^2*

¹Department of Psychology, Kyoto Notre Dame University, Kyoto, Japan.
²Department of Educational Psychology, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2014.515177                

Abstract

We investigated the conformity of Japanese female students with varying self-esteem levels in a co-witness memory experimental paradigm. We had 24 Japanese female student pairs (18 - 26 years old) watch a video clip of a simulated criminal event together. Utilizing a presentation trick, we presented two different versions of the video clip simultaneously on the screen but allowed the viewers to observe only one without their being aware of the duality. Conformity responses were detected through analysis of the answer patterns showing change from their own to their partner’s in pre- and post-memory tests. We also assessed self-esteem and divided the participants into three groups according to their levels. The results showed that participants with low levels of self-esteem tended to conform to their co-witness more often than those with high self-esteem scores. We found that personality traits would be crucial factors in conformity through the present study.

Keywords

Conformity, Self-Esteem, Japanese Female Students, Witness Memory Misinformation Paradigm

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of Independence and Conformity: I. A Minority of One against a Unanimous Majority. Psychological Monograph: General and Applied, 70, Whole No. 416.
[2]	Bernheim, B. D. (1994). A Theory of Conformity. Journal of political Economy,102, 841-877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261957
[3]	Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and Conformity: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) Line Judgment Task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111
[4]	Candel, I., Memon, A., & Al-Harazi, F. (2007). Peer Discussion Affects Children’s Memory Reports. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 1191-1199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1355
[5]	French, L., Garry, M., & Mori, K. (2008). You Say Tomato? Collaborative Remembering Leads to more False Memories for Intimate Couples than for Strangers. Memory, 16, 262-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658210701801491
[6]	French, L., Garry, M., & Mori, K. (2011). Relative—Not Absolute—Judgments of Credibility Affect Susceptibility to Misinformation Conveyed during Discussion. Acta Psychologica, 136, 119-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.10.009
[7]	Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003). Memory Conformity: Can Eyewitnesses Influence Each Other’s Memories for an Event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 533-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.885
[8]	Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Wright, D. B. (2006). Memory Conformity: Disentangling the Steps towards Influence during a Discussion. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 480-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193873
[9]	Garry, M., French, L., Kinzett, T., & Mori, K. (2008). Eyewitness Memory Following Discussion: Using the MORI Technique with a Western Sample. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 431-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1376
[10]	Gewirth, A. (1998). Self-Fulfillment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[11]	Hewitt, L. Y., Kane, R., & Garry, M. (2013). Speaking Order Predicts Memory Conformity after Accounting for Exposure to Misinformation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 558-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0377-4
[12]	Hiraishi, K. (1990). Seinenkiniokerujikoishiki no kozo: Jiko-kakuritu-kan to jiko-kakusan-kankaramitashinrigakutekikenko. [The Structure of Self-Consciousness in Adolescence: Psychological Health from a Point of View of “Self-Establishment” and “Self-Diffusion”]. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 38, 320-329.
[13]	Hirokawa, K., Matsuno, E., Mori, K., & Ukita, J. (2006). The Relationship between Masculinity-Femininity and Suggestibility in an Experimental Collaborative Eyewitness Testimony. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 533-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2006.00190.x
[14]	Hope, L., Ost, J., Gabbert, F., Healey, S., & Lenton, E. (2008). “With a Little Help from my Friends…”: The Role of Co-Witness Relationship in Susceptibility to Misinformation. Acta Psychologica, 127, 476-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.010
[15]	Jack, F., Zydervelt, S., & Zajac, R. (2014). Are Co-Witnesses Special? Comparing the Influence of Co-Witness and Interviewer Misinformation on Eyewitness Reports. Memory, 22, 243-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.778291
[16]	Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
[17]	Mori, K. (2007). A Revised Method for Projecting Two Different Movies to Two Groups of Viewers without Their Noticing the Duality. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 574-578. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193028
[18]	Mori, K., & Mori, H. (2008). Conformity among Cowitnesses Sharing Same or Different Information about an Event in Experimental Collaborative Eyewitness Testimony. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106, 275-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.106.1.275-290
[19]	Paterson, H. M., Kemp, R., & McIntyre, S. (2012). Can a Witness Report Hearsay Evidence Unintentionally? The Effects of Discussion on Eyewitness Memory. Psychology, Crime and Law, 18, 505-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.510117
[20]	Takarangi, M. K. T., Parker, S. L., & Garry, M. (2006). Modernizing the Misinformation Effect: The Development of a New Stimulus Set. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 583-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1209