Share This Article:

Auditory ERP Differences in the Perception of Anticipated Speech Sequences in 5 - 6 Years Old Children and Adults

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:2803KB) PP. 412-422
DOI: 10.4236/jbbs.2014.49040    2,983 Downloads   3,527 Views  

ABSTRACT

The perception of complex auditory information such as complete speech sequences develops during human ontogeny. In order to explore age differences in the auditory perception of predictable speech sequences we compared event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded in 5- to 6-year-old children (N = 15) and adults (N = 15) in response to anticipated speech sequences as successive and reverse digital series with randomly omitted digits. The ERPs obtained from the omitted digits significantly differed in the amplitude and latency of the N200 and P300 components between adults and children, the N400 and LPC components were more pronounced in children in the right frontal area for the digits presentation. These findings indicate that the perception of a successive speech structure is less automated in children and requires a detailed analysis of the successive structure and error detection. These differences in auditory ERPs reflect developmental changes in the auditory perception of speech sequences and can serve as indicators of the maturity of cognitive functions in children.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Galina, P. and Olga, M. (2014) Auditory ERP Differences in the Perception of Anticipated Speech Sequences in 5 - 6 Years Old Children and Adults. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 4, 412-422. doi: 10.4236/jbbs.2014.49040.

References

[1] Moore J.K. and Linthicum Jr., F.H. (2007) The Human Auditory System: A Timeline of Development. International Journal of Audiology, 46, 460-478.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14992020701383019
[2] Murphy, K.M., Beston, B.R., Boley, P.M. and Jones, D.G. (2005) Development of Human Visual Cortex: A Balance between Excitatory and Inhibitory Plasticity Mechanisms. Developmental Psychobiology, 46, 209-221.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dev.20053
[3] Shahin, A.J., Trainor, L.J., Roberts, L.E., Backer, K.C. and Miller, L.M. (2010) Development of Auditory Phase-Locked Activity for Music Sounds. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103, 218-229.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00402.2009
[4] Shibasaki, H. and Miyazaki, M. (1992) Event-Related Potential Studies in Infants and Children. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 9, 408-418.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199207010-00007
[5] Bishop, D.V.M., Anderson, M., Reid, C. and Fox, A.M. (2011) Auditory Development between 7 and 11 Years: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Study. PLoS One, 6, e18993.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018993
[6] Schafer, E.W. and Marcus, M.M. (1973) Self-Stimulation Alters Human Sensory Brain Responses. Science, 181, 175-177.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.181.4095.175
[7] Luria, A.R. (1963) Restoration of Function after Brain Injury. Pergamon Press, London.
[8] Luria, A.R. (1973) Fundamentals of Neurophysiology. Working Brain, Basic Books, New York.
[9] Debruille, J.B. (2007) The N400 Potential Could Index a Semantic Inhibition. Brain Research Reviews, 56, 472-477.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.10.001
[10] Kutas, M. and Federmeier, K.D. (2000) Electrophysiology Reveals Semantic Memory Use in Language Comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 463-470.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6
[11] Freunberger, R., Klimiesch, W., Doppelmayr, M. and Holler, Y. (2007) Visual P2 Component Is Related to Theta Phase-Locking. Neuroscience Letters, 426, 181-186.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2007.08.062
[12] Tremblay, K.L., Shahin, A.J., Picton, T. and Ross, B. (2009) Auditory Training Alters the Physiological Detection of Stimulus-Specific Cues in Humans. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 128-135.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.10.005
[13] Ceponiene, R., Alku, P., Westerfield, M., Torki, M. and Townsend, J. (2005) ERPs Differentiate Syllable and Nonphonetic Sound Processing in Children and Adults. Psychophysiology, 42, 391-406.
[14] Laszlo, S. and Federmeier, K.D. (2008) Minding the PS, Queues, and PXQs: Uniformity of Semantic Processing across Multiple Stimulus Types. Psychophysiology, 45, 458-466.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00636.x
[15] Van Petten, C. and Luka, B.J. (2006) Neural Localization of Semantic Context Effects in Electromagnetic and Hemodynamic Studies. Brain and Language, 97, 279-293.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.11.003
[16] Johnson, J. (2011) N400 Sentence-Level ERPs for 3, 4, and 5 Year Olds. A Poster, Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Diego.
[17] Harbin, T.J., Marsh, G.R. and Harvey, M.T. (1984) Differences in the Late Components of the Event-Related Potential Due to Age and to Semantic and Non-Semantic Tasks. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 59, 489- 496.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(84)90007-8
[18] Rugg, M.D. (1985) The Effects of Semantic Priming and Word Repetition on Event-Related Potentials. Psychophysiology, 22, 642-647.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01661.x
[19] Rugg, M.D. (1990) Event-Related Brain Potentials Dissociate Repetition Effects of High- and Low-Frequency Words. Memory and Cognition, 18, 367-379.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03197126
[20] Kaan, E. and Swaab, T. (2003) Repair, Revision, and Complexity in Syntactic Analysis: An Electrophysiological Differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 98-110.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892903321107855
[21] Patel, A.D., Gibson, E., Ratner, J., Besson, M. and Holcomb, P.J. (1998) Processing Syntactic Relations in Language and Music: An Event-Related Potential Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 717-733.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892998563121
[22] Finnigan, S., Humphreys, M.S., Dennis, S. and Geffen, G. (2002) ERP ‘Old/New’ Effects: Memory Strength and Decisional Factor(s). Neuropsychologia, 40, 2288-2304.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00113-6
[23] Johnson Jr., R. (1995) Event-Related Potential Insights into the Neurobiology of Memory Systems. In: Boller, F. and Grafman, J., Eds., The Handbook of Neuropsychology, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, Vol. 10, 134-164.
[24] Kutas, M. and Hillyard, S.A. (1984) Brain Potentials during Reading Reflect Word Expectancy and Semantic Association. Nature, 307, 161-163.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/307161a0
[25] Rugg, M.D. (1995) Memory and Consciousness: A Selective Review of Issues and Data. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1131-1141.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(95)00053-6
[26] Picton, T.W. and Stuss, D.T. (1980) The Component Structure of the Human Event-Related Potentials. Progress in Brain Research, 54, 17-49.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(08)61604-0
[27] Hoffman, J.E., Simons, R.F. and Houck, M.R. (1983) Event-Related Potentials during Controlled and Automatic Target Detection. Psychophysiology, 20, 625-632.
[28] Shibasaki, H. and Miyazaki, M. (1992) Event-Related Potential Studies in Infants and Children. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 9, 408-418.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199207010-00007
[29] Donchin, E. (1981) Surprise!... Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18, 493-513.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb01815.x
[30] Polich, J. (2007) Updating P300: An Integrative Theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128-2148.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.