The Effect of the Variation of the Downstream Region Distance and Butterfly Valve Angle on Flow Characteristics in a 90 Degree Bended Elbow ()
Abstract
This study presents the
numerical evaluation about the impact of flow disturbance near the intrados and
extrados regions of the 90 degree bended elbow using CFX for several practical
cases where the 90 degree bended upward elbow is located in a proximity to the
butterfly valve and the butterfly valve open angle is changed. For the change
of a butterfly valve open angle from 60% to 100% and the increase of the
distance between a valve and a 90 degree bended elbow, the effect of FAC
(Flow-Accelerated Corrosion) in the 90 degree bended elbow may be neglected
because the value and distribution of the velocity and shear stress is rapidly
decreased comparing with the present status installed in an industry, and the data
of 100% valve open (Case 3) and L/D ≈ 5 (Case 4) are very good agreement
comparing with the reference data, L/D ≈ 8 (Case 2). The reasons are that flow already
maintains a fully developed condition and a steady state in spite of less
distance than the reference case, L/D = 8. Therefore, smooth flow fields have
approached at a 90 degree bended elbow. Then, the effect of shear stress and
vortex is hardly investigated around the intrados area of 90 degree bended
elbow.
Share and Cite:
Won, S. , Lee, J. and Yang, J. (2014) The Effect of the Variation of the Downstream Region Distance and Butterfly Valve Angle on Flow Characteristics in a 90 Degree Bended Elbow.
Modern Mechanical Engineering,
4, 133-143. doi:
10.4236/mme.2014.43013.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1]
|
Addy, A.L., Morris, M J. and Dutton, J.C. (1985) An Investigation of Compressible Flow Characteristics of Butterfly Valve. ASME Journal of Fluid Engineering, 107, 512-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3242522
|
[2]
|
Eom, K. (1988) Performance of Butterfly Valves as a Flow Controller. ASME Journal of Fluid Engineering, 110, 16-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3243503
|
[3]
|
Morris, M.J. and Dutton, J.C. (1989) Aerodynamics Torque Characteristics of Butterfly Valves in Compressible Flow. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 111, 392-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3243658
|
[4]
|
Park, S.W. and Lee, S.W. (2000) Three-Dimensional Flow Characteristics in the Downstream Region of a ButterflyType Valve Used in Air-Conditioning System. KSME Journal B, 24, 260-269.
|
[5]
|
Barton, N.A. (2003) Erosion in Elbow in Hydrocarbon Production System: Review Document. Health & Safety Executive: Research Report 115.
|
[6]
|
EPRI (1998) Application Guide for Motor-Operated Valves in Nuclear Power Plant. EPRI TR-106563-V2.
|
[7]
|
Danbon, F. and Solliec, C. (2000) Aerodynamic Torque of a Butterfly Valve: Influence of an Elbow on the Time-Mean and Instantaneous Aerodynamic Torque. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 122, 337-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.483262
|
[8]
|
Ansys (2005) CFX-10: User’s Manual Version 10, USA.
|