The Relationship between Customers’ Switching Cost and Repurchase Intention: The Moderating Role of Satisfaction

Abstract

Past researches suggest that switching cost could retain customers and increase their repurchase intention; however, this study does not completely agree with this statement. By treating customers’ satisfaction as the moderating variable, this study attempts to identify the relationship between switching cost and customers’ repurchase intention. The research subjects of this study were consumers of mobile phone communication service in Taiwan; the customer satisfaction was divided into high, medium and low degrees. The results indicated that upon different degrees of customer satisfaction, there are different relationships between switching cost and customers’ repurchase intention. Specifically, with high or low customer satisfaction, there is no significant relationship between switching cost and customers’ repurchase intention. Only with medium customer satisfaction, there is a significant and positive relationship between switching cost and customers’ repurchase intention. Therefore, the enterprises should take care that customer satisfaction can not be too low; otherwise, only relying on switching cost, they will not be able to keep the customers.

Share and Cite:

Ting, S. (2014) The Relationship between Customers’ Switching Cost and Repurchase Intention: The Moderating Role of Satisfaction. Journal of Service Science and Management, 7, 313-322. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2014.74028.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Jones, M.A., Mothersbaugh, D.L. and Beatty, S.E. (2000) Switching Barriers and Repurchase Intentions in Services. Journal of Retailing, 76, 259-274.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00024-5
[2] Klemperer, P. (1995) Competition When Consumers Have Switching Costs: An Overview with Application to Industrial Organization, Macroeconomics and International Trade. Review of Economic Studies, 62, 515-539.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2298075
[3] Morgan, R.M. and Hunt, S.D. (1994) The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252308
[4] Colgate, M. and Lang, B. (2001) Switching Barriers in Consumer Markets: An Investigation of the Financial Services Industry. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 332-347.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07363760110393001
[5] Bell, S.J., Auh, S. and Smalley, K. (2005) Customer Relationship Dynamics: Service Quality and Customer Loyalty in the Context of Varying Levels of Customer Expertise and Switching Costs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 169-183.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092070304269111
[6] Burnham, T.A., Frels, J.K. and Mahajan, V. (2003) Consumer Switching Costs: A Typology, Antecedents, and Consequence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 109-126.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092070302250897
[7] Jones, M.A., Mothersbaugh, D.L. and Beatty, S.E. (2002) Why Customers Stay: Measuring the Underlying Dimensions of Services Switching Costs and Managing Their Differential Strategic Outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 55, 441-450.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00168-5
[8] Lu, T., Tu, R. and Jen, W. (2011) The Role of Service Value and Switching Barriers in an Integrated Model of Behavioural Intentions. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22, 1071-1089.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2011.614867
[9] Tsai, H.T., Huang, H.C., Jaw, Y.L. and Chen, W.K. (2006) Why On-Line Customers Remain with a Particular E-Retailer: An Integrative Model and Empirical Evidence. Psychology & Marketing, 23, 447-464.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.20121
[10] Kim, G., Shin, B. and Lee, H.G. (2006) A Study of Factors That Affect User Intentions toward Email Service Switching. Information & Management, 43, 884-893.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.08.004
[11] Shin, D.H. and Kim, W.Y. (2008) Forecasting Customer Switching Intention in Mobile Service: An Exploratory Study of Predictive Factors in Mobile Number Portability. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 75, 854-874.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2007.05.001
[12] Whitten, D. and Wakefield, R.L. (2006) Measuring Switching Costs in IT Outsourcing Services. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15, 219-248.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.11.002
[13] Bendapudi, N. and Berry, L.L. (1997) Customers’ Motivations for Maintaining Relationships with Service Providers. Journal of Retailing, 73, 15-37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90013-0
[14] Homburg, C., Hoyer, W.D. and Koschate, N. (2005) Customers’ Reactions to Price Increases: Do Customer Satisfaction and Perceived Motive Fairness Matter? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 36-49.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092070304269953
[15] Ibánez, V.A., Hartmann, P. and Calvo, P.Z. (2006) Antecedents of Customer Loyalty in Residential Energy Markets: Service Quality, Satisfaction, Trust and Switching Costs. Service Industries Journal, 26, 633-650.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02642060600850717
[16] Lin, H.H. and Wang, Y.S. (2006) An Examination of the Determinants of Customer Loyalty in Mobile Commerce Contexts. Information & Management, 43, 271-282.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.08.001
[17] Chaiken, S. (1980) Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
[18] Chaiken, S. and Trope, Y. (1999) Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. Guilford, New York.
[19] Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988) Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
[20] Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.