Acoustic Emission Studies on Weld Bead Defects in Nuclear Grade SS 316L Materials

Ranganayakulu S. V., Shiva Raju J., Kuchedludu A., Ramesh Kumar B.

Center for Non Destructive Evaluation, Gurunanak Institutions Technical Campus, Hyderabad, India.
Institute for Plasma Research [IPR], Bhatt, Gujarat State, India.

DOI: 10.4236/oja.2014.43012                

Abstract

This paper contributes about the behaviour of Acoustic Emission (AE) signatures of implanted weld defects of SS 316L materials. Lack of penetration and lack of side fusion defects were implanted in weld bead region of the materials. Tungsten Inert Gas Welding (TIG) is adopted to weld the Stainless Steel (SS316L) nuclear grade materials. The material is fabricated with dimensions of 140 × 16 × 10 mm and AE signatures are studied under preload conditions. Mechanical Jig is fabricated to maintain constant load in concentrated weld region. When external load is applied on the weld region, the deformed specimen experiences acoustic emission signals form the weld defect region which are potential source of releasing stress energy. Liner Location Technique (LLT) is adopted for AE singal studies and the generated signal is processed by 2-channel USB—AE node and AE-WIN software. The tests are conducted on two different samples having each defect. A conventional NDT method i.e. X-ray Radiography is conducted on the samples to know the defect ranging and correlated with AE signatures. This study will be helpful to standardize the AE signals for different implanted weld defects of SS 316L materials and it is found that, the parameter “counts vs. amplitude” has given the widest distinction with respect to the type of defects.

Keywords

Acoustic Emission Signatures, X-Ray Radiography, Lack of Side Fusion, Lack of Penetration, Tungsten Inert Gas Welding (TIG)

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Acoustic Emission Testing. Nondestructive Testing Handbook. 3rd edition, Vol. 6. American Society for Non-destructive Testing, 2005.
[2]	McLaskey, G.C. and Glaser, S.D. (2012) Acoustic Emission Sensor Calibration for Absolute Source Measurements. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 31, 157-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10921-012-0131-2
[3]	Raj, B. and Jayakumar, T. (1990) Acoustic Emission during Tensile Deformation and Fracture of Austenitic Alloys. Acoustic Emission Current Practices and Future Directions-ASTM STP 1077, 218-241.
[4]	Camerini, C.S., Rebello, J.M.A. and Soares, S.D. (1992) Relationship between Acoustic Emission and CTOD Testing for a Structural Steel. NDT & E International, 25, 127-133.
[5]	Dia, S., Monnier, T., Godin, N. and Zhang F. (2012) Primary Calibration of Acoustic Emission Sensors by the Method of Reciprocity, Theoretical and Experimental Considerations. 30th European Conference on Acoustic Emission Testing & 7th International Conference on Acoustic Emission University of Granada, 12-15 September 2012.
[6]	Brunner, A.J., Tannert, T. and Vallée, T. (2010) Waveform Analysis of Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Tensile Tests on Welded Wood-Joints. Journal of Acoustic EMISSION, 28, 59-67.
[7]	Keprt, J. and Benes, P. (2007) Determination of Uncertainty in Calibration of Acoustic Emission Sensors. 4th International Conference on NDT, Chania, 11-14 October 2007.
[8]	Armentrut D.L. and Carpenter S.H. (1997) An Investigation of Luders Band Deformation and the Associated Acoustic Emission Al-4.5% Mg Alloys. Journal of Acoustic Emission, 15, 43-51,
[9]	Carpenter, S.H., Ono, K. and Armentrout, D. (2006) Acoustic Emission of Sensitized 304 Stainless Steel with Simultaneous Hydrogen Charging. Journal of Acoustic Emission, 24, 119-126.
[10]	Vahaviolos, S.J. (1998) ASTM STP 1353 Acoustic Emission Standards and Technology Update. ASTM, Florida, 76, 77.
[11]	Keeprt, J. and Benes, P. (2008) A Comparison of AE Sensor Calibration Methods. Journal of Acoustic Emission, 26, 60-70.
[12]	Romrell, D.M. (1973) Acoustic Emission Weld Monitoring of Nuclear Components. Journal of Welding Research Supplement, 81-92.
[13]	ASTM E94-04 (2010) Standard Guide for Radiographic Examination.
[14]	ASTM E390-11, Standard Reference Radiographs for Steel Fusion Welds.
[15]	ASTM E1815-08 (2013) Standard Test Method for Classification of Film Systems for Industrial Radiography.
[16]	ASTM E1032-12, Standard Test Method for Radiographic Examination of Weldments.
[17]	ASTM E592-99 (2009) e11, Standard Guide to Obtainable ASTM Equivalent Penetrameter Sensitivity for Radiography of Steel Plates 1/4 to 2 in. (6 to 51 mm) Thick with X Rays and 1 to 6 in. (25 to 152 mm) Thick with Cobalt-60.
[18]	Raasekhar, P., Bhat, M.R., Murthy, C.R.L., Phanira, C., Jayakumar, T. and Baldev Raj (2006) Discrimination of Nuclear grade Steel Samples Subjected to Different Heat Treatment Procedures Based on Acoustic Emission (AE) Data Profiling a Crack Initiation. Proceedings of National Seminar on Non-Destructive Evaluation, Hyderabad, 7-9 December 2006.
[19]	Aljets, D., Chong, A., Wilcox, S. and Holford, K. (2010) Acoustic Emission Source Location in Plate-Like Structures Using a Closely Arranged Triangular Sensor Array. Journal of Acoustic Emission, 28, 85-98.
[20]	George Varkey Strategic Electronics Group (2003) On-Line Processing of Acoustic Emission Signals. Awareness Seminar on Digital Signal Processing (ASDSP-2003), Paper 7, 1-12.
[21]	Manthei, G. (2010) Characterization of Acoustic Emission Sensors. Proceedings of European Conference on Acoustic Emission Testing, Venna, 8-10 September 2010.
[22]	Ennaceur, C., Lakshimi, A., Hervve, C., Ediouni, M. and Cherfaui, M. (2004) Acoustic Emission Technique and Potential Difference Method for Detecting the Different Stages of Crack Propagation in Carbon and Stainless Steels. Journal of Acoustic Emission, 22, 71-76.
[23]	Mukhopadhyay, C.K., Ray, K.K., Jayakumar, T. and Raj, B. (2000) Acoustic Emission Stress Intensity Factor Relations for Tensile Deformation of Notched Specimens of AISI Type 304 Stainless Steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 293, 137-145.