Identification of Bridge Movement Mechanisms


Bridge behavior is highly dependent upon the movement mechanisms present throughout the structure. These mechanisms (e.g. bearing, joints, etc.) have a substantial impact on the long-term durability and potential safety of the structure. A major distinguisher between the varieties of movement systems is their operating timescale. In some cases, they function rapidly, within fractions of a second, and in other cases gradually over days, months or even years. However, in nearly all cases, the lifecycle of the movement system is shorter than that of the bridge assuring the need for future intervention. Breakdown of a movement system can produce unintended forces/deformations that progressively degrade the structure. Identification and tracking of movement mechanisms proactively address long-term durability by helping to avoid these unintended consequences. A general framework for characterization of these mechanisms was developed. This framework was applied to an operating bridge that includes several critical mechanisms operating over different timescales. As a result of this and other studies, recommendations are provided for identification of bridge movement systems.


Share and Cite:

Yarnold, M. (2014) Identification of Bridge Movement Mechanisms. Engineering, 6, 584-591. doi: 10.4236/eng.2014.69059.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] FHWA (2012) National Bridge Inventory (NBI). FHWA, Washington DC.
[2] Mendez, V.M. (2012) 1st Letter Report of the TRB Long-Term Bridge Performance (LTBP) Committee, in Transportation Research Board. The National Academies, Onlinepubs.
[3] FHWA (2001) 23 CFR Part 650, in FHWA Docket No. FHWA-2001-8954. National Bridge Inspection Standards. FHWA, Washington DC.
[4] ASCE and SEI (2013) Structural Identification of Constructed Systems. In: Catbas, N., Kijewski-Correa, T. and Aktan, A.E., Eds., Approaches, Methods, and Technologies for Effective Practice of St-Id, 1-13
[5] Ni, Y., et al. (2007) Assessment of Bridge Expansion Joints Using Long-Term Displacement and Temperature Measurement. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 21, 143-151.
[6] Cao, Y., et al. (2011) Temperature Effects on Cable Stayed Bridge Using Health Monitoring System: A Case Study. Structural Health Monitoring, 10, 523-537.
[7] Swanson, B., Malla, R. and Shaw, M. (2013) Laboratory Testing, Field Installation, and Monitoring of a Silicone Foam Sealant for Bridge Expansion Joints. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 18, 758-767.
[8] Crocetti, R. and Edlund, B. (2003) Fatigue Performance of Modular Bridge Expansion Joints. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 17, 167-176.
[9] Yarnold, M.T., et al. (2012) Evaluation of a Long-Span Steel Tied Arch Bridge Using Temperature-Based Structural Identification. International Association for Bridge Management and Safety, Stresa.
[10] Chen, Q. (2008) Effects of Thermal Loads on Texas Steel Bridges. The University of Texas, Austin.
[11] Herman, R., et al. (2007) Performance of Steel Bridges under Thermally Induced Loads. World Steel Bridge Symposium, New Orleans, 5-7 December 2007, 1-8.
[12] Dubbs, N.C. (2012) Development, Validation, and Assessment of a Multiple Model Structural Identification Method. Drexel University, Philadelphia.
[13] McDonald, J., Heymsfield, E. and Avent, R. (2000) Slippage of Neoprene Bridge Bearings. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 5, 216-223.
[14] Yarnold, M.T., Moon, F.L. and Aktan, A.E. (2013) Temperature-Based Structural Identification of Long-Span Bridges. Submitted to Journal of Structural Engineering.
[15] Yarnold, M.T. (2013) Temperature-Based Structural Identification and Health Monitoring for Long-Span Bridges. Drexel University, Philadelphia.
[16] Zalt, A., et al. (2007) Evaluating Sensors for Bridge Health Monitoring. IEEE EIT, Chicago.

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.