Eurasian Economic Community: Towards Integration. Economic Challenges and Geostrategic Aspects


The present study deals with Eurasian Economic Community (EurAsEC), a relatively new entity that appeared in the post-Soviet region, which tries to join the neighboring countries into a strong and structured union. The paper presents the integration steps that have been taken so far and examines the economic challenges faced as well as the geostrategic aspects. A comparison with the benchmark of the surrounding area, the European Union, is also undertaken in order to investigate both the similarities and differences among them and show if they could co-exist in the years to come. The main purpose of this study is to examine the reasons for the union’s formation, shed light on its economic prospects and highlight the newly established geostrategic conditions in such a crucial territory of the world.

Share and Cite:

Vousinas, G. (2014) Eurasian Economic Community: Towards Integration. Economic Challenges and Geostrategic Aspects. Modern Economy, 5, 951-966. doi: 10.4236/me.2014.59088.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Henrekson, M., Torstenson, J. and Torstenson, R. (1997) Growth Effects of European Integration. European Economic Review, 41, 1537-1557.
[2] Shiells, C. and Sattar, S. (2004) The Low-Income Countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States. Progress and Challenges in Transition. International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, Washington DC.
[3] Michalopoulos, C. and Tarr, D. (1997) The Economics of Customs Unions in the Commonwealth of Independent States. Post Soviet Geography and Economics, 38.
[4] International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, October 2013.
[5] Kononczuk, W. (2007) The Failure of Integration. The CIS and Other International Organisations in the Post-Soviet Area, 1991-2006, Centre for Eastern Studies, Warsaw, OSW Studies 2007-05-14.
[6] EDB Eurasian Integration Yearbook, 2013.
[7] Abalkina A. Preconditions and Prospects for Banking Integration in the Eurasian Economic Community.
[8] Krishna, P. (1998) Regionalism and Multilateralism: A Political Economy Approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113.
[9] Krugman, P. (1991) Is Bilateralism Bad? In: De Melo, J. and Panagariya, A., Eds., New Dimensions in Regional Integration, Cambridge University Press, New York.
[10] Rutherford, T. and Tarr, D. (2010) Regional Impacts of Liberalization of Barriers against Foreign Direct Investment in Services: The Case of Russia’s Accession to the WTO. Review of International Economics, 18, 30-46.
[11] Libman, A. and Vinokurov, E. (2012) Holding-Together Regionalism: Twenty Years of Post-Soviet Integration. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
[12] Averre, D. (2009) Competing Rationalities: Russia, the EU and the “Shared Neighbourhood”’. Europe-Asia Studies, 61, 1689-1713.
[13] Dragneva, R. and Wolczuk, K. (2012) Russia, the Eurasian Customs Union and the EU: Cooperation, Stagnation or Rivalry? Chattam House Briefing Paper 2012/01, Chattam House, Russia and Eurasia Programme.
[14] Ferrero-Waldner, B. (2006) The European Neighbourhood Policy: The EU’s Newest Foreign Policy Instrument. European Foreign Affairs Review.
[15] Olcott, M.B., Aslund, A. and Garnett, S.W. (1999) Getting It Wrong: Regional Cooperation and the Commonwealth of Independent States. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington DC.
[16] Vinokurov, E. (2007) Russian Approaches to Integration in the Post-Soviet Space in the 2000s. In: Malfliet, K., Verpoest, L. and Vinokurov, E., Eds., The CIS, the EU, and Russia: Challenges of Integration, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
[17] Centre for Integration Studies (2012) Comprehensive Estimate of Macroeconomic Effect of Various Forms of Deep Economic Cooperation of Ukraine with members of the Customs Union and the CES. Saint-Petersburg.
[18] Van der Loo, G. and Van Elsuwege, P. (2012) Competing Paths of Regional Economic Integration in the Post-Soviet Space: Legal and Political Dilemmas for Ukraine. Review of Central and East European Law, 37, 421-447.
[19] Riley, A. (2012) Commission v. Gazprom: The Antitrust Clash of the Decade? CEPS Policy Brief, CEPS, Brussels.
[20] BP (2010) BP Statistical Review of World Energy.

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.