Microleakage of Nanofilled Composite Resin Restorative Material

DOI: 10.4236/jbnb.2011.23040   PDF   HTML     7,206 Downloads   13,796 Views   Citations


The role of nanofillers in reducing the microleakage of dental composite resins has not been previously investigated. So this study was designed to evaluate microleakage of nanofilled composite resin in comparison to the conventional hybrid composite. Twenty extracted sound molars were selected. Class II cavities were prepared. All cavities were etched (enamel and dentin) with 37% phosphoric acid. Dentin bonding agents were applied to etched tooth surfaces and restored with nanofilled and hybrid composite restorative materials. The restored teeth were thermocycled. Specimens were immersed in 2% methylene blue dye, sectioned along the mesio-distal direction; dye penetration of occlusal and gingival margins of each section was evaluated using a stereo-microscope. No significant difference was found between the microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid composite restorations at occlusal / enamel and at gingival / dentin margins. Also, there were no significant differences for nanofilled composite restorations at occlusal / enamel margins and gingival / dentin margins. On the other hand, there were a significant differences for hybrid composite restorations at occlusal / enamel margins and gingival / dentin margins.

Share and Cite:

I. Hamouda, H. Elkader and M. Badawi, "Microleakage of Nanofilled Composite Resin Restorative Material," Journal of Biomaterials and Nanobiotechnology, Vol. 2 No. 3, 2011, pp. 329-334. doi: 10.4236/jbnb.2011.23040.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] J. Mahart, R. Hickel, “Esthetic compomer restorations in posterior teeth using a new all-in-one adhesives: case presentation”, J. Esthet and Restor Dent, Vol. 11, No. 5, 1999, pp. 250-258.
[2] J. F. Roulet, “The problems associated with substituting composite resins for Amalgam”: A status report on posterior composites, J. Dent, Vol. 6, No.3, 1988, pp.101-103.
[3] S. C. Bayne, H. O. Heymann, E. J. Swift, “Update on dental composite restoration”, J. Am Dent Assoc, Vol. 125, No.6, 1994, pp. 687-701.
[4] N. Attar, M. D. Turgut, “Fluoride release and uptake capacities of fluoride releasing restorative materials”, Oper Dent, Vol. 28, No.4, 2003, pp. 395-402.
[5] J. Mahart, H. Y. Chen, R. Hickel, “The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations”, J. Am Dent Assoc, Vol. 132, No. 5, 2001, pp. 639- 645.
[6] K. F. Leinfelder Posterior composite resins: the materials and their clinical performance, J. Amer Dent Assoc, Vol. 126, No. 5, 1995, pp. 663-672.
[7] O. Bala, M. B. üctasli, I. ünlu, “The leakage of class II cavities restored with packable resin-based composites” J. Contemp Dent Pract, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2003, pp.1-11.
[8] D. Simone, N. B. David, P. Aikaterini, P. Ronald, “Microleakage of resin-based liner materials and condensable composites using filled and unfilled adhesives” Am J. Dent, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2003, pp. 351-355.
[9] J. G. Bauer, J. L. Henson, “Microleakage. A measure of the performance of direct filling materials”, Oper Dent, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1984, pp. 2-9.
[10] B. Torsten, M. Brannstrom, B. Maltson, “A new method for sealing composite resin contraction gaps in lined cavities”, J. Dent Res, Vol. 64, No.3, 1985, pp. 450-453.
[11] J. D. Eick, F. H. Welch, “Polymerization of posterior composite resins and its possible influences on postoperative sensitivity”, Quint Inter, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1986, pp. 103-111.
[12] D. Fortin, E. J. Swift, G. E. Denehy, J. W. Reinhardt, “Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives”, Dent Mater, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1994, pp. 253-258.
[13] J. R. Holtan, G. P. Nystrom, S. E. Rensen, R. A. Phelps, W. H. Douglas, “Microleakage of five dental adhesives”, Oper Dent, Vol. 19, No.2, 1993, pp. 189-193.
[14] V. Quist,“The effect of mastication on marginal adaptation of composite restorations in vivo”, J. Dent Res, Vol. 72, No. 1, 1993, pp. 490-494.
[15] D. B. Mohler, L. W. Nelson, “Factors affecting on the marginal leakage of amalgam”, J. Amer Dent Assoc, Vol. 108, No.1, 1984, pp. 51-54.
[16] M. Brannstrom, “Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment”, Oper Dent, Vol. 9, No., 1984, pp. 57-66.
[17] D. H. Retief, “Do adhesive prevent microleakage?”, Inter Dent J, Vol. 44, No.1 , 1994, pp. 19-26.
[18] T. C. Steet, J. Perdig?o, E. J. Swift, “Marginal adaptation of composite restorations with and without flowable liner”, J. Dent Res, Vol. 79, No.2, 2001, pp. 269-275.
[19] M. Brannstrom, K. J. Nordenvall, “Bacterial penetration, pulp reaction and inner surface of concise enamel bond composite fillings in etched and un etched cavities”, J. Dent Res, Vol. 57, No. 1, 1978, pp. 3-10.
[20] K. W. Fouad, J. S. h. Firas, “Evaluation of the microleakage at the proximal walls of classII cavities restored using resin composite and procured composite inserts”, Quint Inter, Vol. 34, 2003, pp. 600-606.
[21] J. B. Almeida, J. A. Platt, Y. Oshida, B. K. Moore, M. A. Cochran, G. J. Eckert, “Three different methods to evaluate microleakage of packable composites in class II restorations”, Oper Dent, Vol. 28, No.4 , 2003, pp. 453-460.
[22] E. Elias, G. Sajjan, “Effect of bleaching on microleakage of resin composite restorations in non-vital teeth. An in-vitro study”, J. Endodont, Vol. 14, 2002, pp. 9-13.
[23] W. W. Barkmeier, A. L. Cooley, “Laboratory evaluation of adhesive system”, Oper Dent, Vol. 17, Suppl 5, 1992, pp. 50-61.
[24] J. Kanca, “Posterior composite microleakage below the cementoenamel junction”, Quint Inter, Vol. 18, No. 5, 1987, pp. 347-349.
[25] N. Nakabayashi, K. Kojima, E. Masuhara, “The promotion of adhesion by infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates”, Biomed Mater Res, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1982, pp. 265-273.
[26] R. R. Russel, R. B. Mazer, “Should flowable composites be used as liners for class II restorations?” J. Dent Res, Vol. 78, No. 3, 1999, pp. 389-392.
[27] W. S. Eakle, R. K. Ito, “Effect of insertion technique on microleakage in mesio-occlusodistal composite resin restorations”, Quint Inter, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1990, pp. 369-374.
[28] T. J. Hilton, R. S. Schwartzs, J. L. Ferracane, “Microleakage of four class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature”, Quint Inter, Vol. 28, No. 2 ,1997, pp. 135-144.
[29] C. Leevailoj, M. A. Cochran, B. A. Martis, B. K. Moore, J. Platt“Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners”, Oper Dent, Vol. 26. 26, No. 3, 2001, pp. 302-307.
[30] L.A. Linden, O. Kallskog, M. Wolgast, “Human dentin as a hydrogel”, Archives Oral Biology, Vol. 40, 1996, pp. 991-1004.
[31] A. L. Neme, B. B. Maxson, F. E. Pink, “Microleakage of class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: an in vitro study”, Oper Dent, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2002, pp. 600-605.
[32] M. Ogata, M. Okuda, M. Nakajima, “Influence of the direction of tubules on bond strength to dentin”, Oper Dent, Vol. 26, No., 2001, pp. 27-35.
[33] C. Parti, L. Tao, M. Simpson, D. H. Pashley, “Permeability and microleakage of class II resin composite restorations, J. Dent, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1994, pp. 49-56.
[34] A. Ben-Amar, H. S. Cardash. The fluid-filled gap under amalgam and resin composite restorations”, Amer J Dent, Vol. 4, No. 5, 1991, pp. 226-230.
[35] F. Lutz, T. Imfeld, F. Barbakow, W. Iselin, “Optimizing the marginal adaptation of MOD composite restorations. In: Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials”, St Paul Peter Szuk, 1985, pp. 405-419.
[36] M. Staninec, A. Mochizuki, K. Fuckuda, “Interfacial space, marginal leakage and enamel cracks around composite resins”, Oper Dent, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1986, pp. 14- 24.
[37] R. L. Bowen, K. R. Nemoto, J. E. Rapson, “Adhesive bonding of various material to hard tooth tissue force developed in composite materials during hardening”, J. Amer Dent Assoc, Vol. 106, No. 4, 1983, pp. 475-477.
[38] M. G. Buonocore, “A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface”, J. Dent Res, Vol. 34, No. 6, 1955, pp. 849-853.
[39] M. Brannstrom H. Nyborg, “Cavity treatment with a microbiocidal fluoride solution: growth of bacteria and effect on pulp”, J. Prosthet Dent, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1973, pp. 303-310.
[40] S. P. Gray B. D. Chewing, “Reducing marginal leakage in posterior composite resin restorations. A review of clinical technique”, J. Prosth Dent, Vol. 63, No. 3, 1990, pp. 63: 73.
[41] D. H. Pashley, V. Michelich, T. Kehl, “Dentin permeability effect of smear layer removal”, J. Prosthet Dent, Vol. 46, No. 5, 1981, pp. 531-537.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.