Non-Linear EEG Measures in Meditation

Home > Journals > Biomedical & Life Sciences > JBiSE

JBiSE> Vol.7 No.9, July 2014

Share This Article:

Open Access

Non-Linear EEG Measures in Meditation

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML

Download as PDF (Size:981KB) PP. 731-738

DOI: 10.4236/jbise.2014.79072 2,813 Downloads 3,719 Views Citations

Author(s) Leave a comment

Oldřich Vyšata, Martin Schätz, Jakub Kopal, Jan Burian, Aleš Procházka, Kuchyňka Jiří, Jakub Hort, Martin Vališ

Affiliation(s)

Department of Computing and Control Engineering, Institute of Chemical Technology, Prague, Czech Republic.
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, University of Economics Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Memory Disorders Clinic, Department of Neurology, Charles University in Prague, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.

ABSTRACT

In this study, the performance of Sevcik’s algorithm that calculates the fractal dimension and permutation entropy as discriminants to detect calming and insight meditation in electroencephalo-graphic (EEG) signals was assessed. The proposed methods were applied to EEG recordings from meditators practicing insight meditation and calming meditation before as well as during both types of meditation. Analysis was conducted using statistical hypothesis testing to determine the validity of the proposed meditation-identifying techniques. For both types of meditation, there was a statistically significant reduction in the permutation entropy. This result can be explained by the increased EEG synchronization, which is repeatedly observed in the course of meditation. In contrast, the fractal dimension (FD) was significantly increased during calming meditation, but during insight meditation, no statistically significant change was detected. Increased FD during meditation can be interpreted as an increase in self-similarity of EEG signals during self-organisation of hierarchical structure oscillators in the brain. Our results indicate that fractal dimension and permutation entropy could be used as parameters to detect both types of meditation. The permutation entropy is advantageous compared with the fractal dimension because it does not require a stationary signal.

KEYWORDS

Permutation Entropy, Fractal Dimension, EEG, Calming Meditation, Insight Meditation

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Vyšata, O. , Schätz, M. , Kopal, J. , Burian, J. , Procházka, A. , Jiří, K. , Hort, J. and Vališ, M. (2014) Non-Linear EEG Measures in Meditation. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 7, 731-738. doi: 10.4236/jbise.2014.79072.

References

[1]	Malinowski, P. (2013) Neural Mechanisms of Attentional Control in Mindfulness Meditation. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00008

[2]	Baer, R.A. (2005) Mindfulness-Based Treatment Approaches: Clinician’s Guide to Evidence Base and Applications. Academic Press, New York.

[3]	Didonna, F. (2009) Clinical Handbook of Mindfulness. Springer, New York.

[4]	Bhattacharya, J. (2000) Complexity Analysis of Spontaneous EEG. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 60, 495-501.

[5]	Rapp, P.E., Albano, A.M., Schmah, A.M. and Farwell, L.A. (1993) Filtered Noise Can Mimic Low-Dimensional Chaotic Attractors. Physical Review E, 47, 2289-2297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.47.2289

[6]	Klonowski, W., Jernajczyk, W., Niedzielska, K., Rydz, A. and Stepień, R. (1999) Quantitative Measure of Complexity of EEG Signal Dynamics. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 59, 315-321.

[7]	Raghavendra, B.S. and Narayana Dutt, D. (2010) Computing Fractal Dimension of Signals Using Multiresolution Box-Counting Method. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 61, 1223-1238.

[8]	Kreuzer, M., Kochs, E.F., Schneider, G. and Jordan, D. (2014) Non-Stationarity of EEG during Wakefulness and Anaesthesia: Advantages of EEG Permutation Entropy Monitoring. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9553-y

[9]	Theiler, J., Eubank, S., Longtin, A., Galdrikian, B. and Farmer, J.D. (1992) Testing for Nonlinearity in Time Series: The Method of Surrogate Data. Physica D, 58, 77-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(92)90102-S

[10]	Rombouts, S.A.R.B., Keunen, R.W.M. and Stam, C.J. (1995) Investigation of Nonlinear Structure in Multichannel EEG. Physics Letters A, 202, 352-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(95)00335-Z

[11]	Stam, C.J., Breakspear, M., van Cappellen van Walsum, A.M. and van Dijk, B.W. (2003) Nonlinear Synchronization in EEG and Whole-Head MEG Recordings of Healthy Subjects. Human Brain Mapping, 19, 63-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10106

[12]	Schreiber, T. and Schmitz, A. (2000) Surrogate Time Series. Physica D, 142, 346-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00043-9

[13]	Dunn, B.R., Hartigan, J.A. and Mikulas, W.L. (1999) Concentration and Mindfulness Meditations: Unique Forms of Consciousness? Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 24, 147-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023498629385

[14]	Aftanas, L.I. and Golocheikine, S.A. (2002) Non-linear Dynamic Complexity of the Human EEG during Meditation. Neuroscience Letters, 330, 143-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00745-0

[15]	Sevcik, C. (2006) On Fractal Dimension of Waveforms. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 28, 579-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2005.07.003

[16]	Hara, S., Kawaharaa, Y., Washioa, T., von Bnau, P., Tokunagac, T. and Yumotot, K. (2012) Separation of Stationary and Non-stationary Sources with a Generalized Eigenvalue Problem. Neural Networks, 33, 7-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2012.04.001

[17]	Von Bunau, P., Meinecke, F., Kiraly, F. and Robert-Muller, K. (2009) Finding Stationary Subspaces in Multivariate Time Series. Physical Review Letters, 103, Article ID: 214101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.103.214101

[18]	Quiroga-Lombard, C., Hass, J. and Durstewitz, D. (2013) A Method for Stationarity-Segmentation of Spike Train Data with Application to the Pearson Cross-Correlation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 110, 562-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00186.2013

[19]	Hazarika, N., Tsoi, A.C. and Sergejew, A.A. (1997) Nonlinear Considerations in EEG Signal Classification. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 45, 829-936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2012.04.001

[20]	Bandt, C. and Pompe, B. (2002) Permutation Entropy: A Natural Complexity Measure for Time Series. Physical Review Letters, 88, Article ID: 174102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.174102

[21]	Lutzenberger, W., Preissl, H. and Pulvermuller, F. (1995) Fractal Dimension of Electroencephalographic Time Series and Underlying Brain Processes. Biological Cybernetics, 73, 477-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00201482

[22]	Newberg, A., Alavi, A., Baime, M., Pourdehnad, M., Santanns, J. and Aquilli, E. (2001) The Measurement of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow during the Complex Cognitive Task of Meditation: A Preliminary SPECT Study. Psychiatry Research, 106, 113-122.

[23]	Elbert, T., Ray, W.J., Kowalik, Z.J., Skinner, J.E., Graf, K.E. and Birbaumer, N. (1994) Chaos and Physiology: Deterministic Chaos in Excitable Cell Assemblies. Physiological Reviews, 74, 1-47.

[24]	Molle, M., Marshall, L., Pietrowsky, R., Lutzenberger, W., Fehm, H.L. and Born, J. (1995) Dimensional Complexity of EEG Indicates a Right Fronto-Cortical Locus of Attentional Control. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 45-55.

[25]	Lutzenberger, W., Elbert, T., Birbaumer, N., Ray, W.J. and Schupp, H. (1992) The Scalp Distribution of the Fractal Dimension of the EEG and Its Variation with Mental Tasks. Brain Topography, 5, 27-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01129967

[26]	Schupp, H.T., Lutzenberger, W., Birbaumer, N., Miltner, W. and Braun, C. (1994) Neurophysiological Differences between Perception and Imagery. Cognitive Brain Research, 2, 77-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(94)90004-3

[27]	Molle, M., Marshall, L., Wolf, B., Fehm, H.L. and Born, J. (1999) EEG Complexity And Performance Measures of Creative Thinking. Psychophysiology, 36, 95-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0048577299961619