Comparing Two Pre-Service Learning Scenario Formats: Web-Conference & In-Person


The primary objective of this study was to compare student satisfaction on two different teaching formats, in-person instruction (IPI) and web-conference instruction (WCI). Participants were 42 pre-service teachers who were completing their service learning requirements. Students were enrolled as elementary education majors in a teacher education undergraduate program in the southeastUnited States. A seven-item course evaluation survey was developed to assess such students’ areas as understanding the learning objectives, comfort level of the learning environment, instructor communication barriers, and willingness for future participation. Findings from this study indicated that web-conference instruction provided equivalent levels of students’ 1) understanding the learning objectives, 2) comfort level of the learning environment, and 3) willingness for future participation as the in-person format.

Share and Cite:

Robichaux-Davis, R. and Guarino, A. (2014) Comparing Two Pre-Service Learning Scenario Formats: Web-Conference & In-Person. Creative Education, 5, 1186-1188. doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.513134.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing Service-Learning in Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 221-239.
[2] Curran, V. R. (2006). Tele-Education. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 12, 57-63.
[3] Furco, A. (2002). Is Service-Learning Really Better than Community Service? In A. Furco, & S. H. Billig (Eds.), Service-Learning: The Essence of Pedagogy (p. 25). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
[4] Tabor, S. W. (2007). Narrowing the Distance: Implementing a Hybrid Learning Model. Quarterly Review of Distance Education (IAP), 8, 48-49.
[5] Vaughan, N. D. (2010). Blended Learning. In M. F. Cleveland-Innes, & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), An Introduction to Distance Education: Understanding Teaching and Learning in a New Era (p. 165). London: Taylor & Francis.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.