Cargo Airships: International Competition

Barry E. Prentice, Robert Knotts

Airship Association, London, UK.
I.H. Asper School of Business, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

DOI: 10.4236/jtts.2014.43019                

Abstract

The advance of transportation technology depends on science and economics. During the 1930s, airships and airplanes competed head-to-head for the Atlantic passenger market. When World War 2 broke out, everything changed. Over the next five years, the combined combatants built over half of a million military airplanes. By the end of the war, four-engine, high-altitude bombers and jet engines were developed. Further investment in airplane technology was stimulated by the Cold War. All this public investment was adapted to civilian passenger jet airplanes. By 1980, dedicated jet airplanes were in use as cargo carriers. Despite the growth of the cargojet market over the past three decades, rising fuel costs and environmental concerns are changing the economics of airships and airplanes again. Investment in large cargo airships is returning. Much of the technology developed for fixed-wing aircraft can be applied to cargo airships. New materials, better engines, control systems and engineering eliminate the need for large ground crews and improve airship reliability and safety. However, two fundamental design issues have yet to be resolved: structural integrity and buoyancy control. A worldwide competition is underway on three continents to develop the dominant design for a cargo airship. This paper examines the alternative design approaches and presents the status of the international competition.

Keywords

Cargo Airships, Dominant Design, World Developments

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	DOD (2012) Hybrid Airships Operational Concepts. Office of the US Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. Rapid Reaction. www.hsdl.org/?view&did=728732
[2]	Govers III, F.X. (2013) Aeroscraft Begins Flight Testing Following FAA Certification. http://www.gizmag.com/aeros-gets-faa-approval-for-testing/28970/
[3]	Russian Radio (2013) A Daring Project of Russian Airship Designers. 6 February 2013.
[4]	Talesnikov, M. (2013) Atlant. 3rd Cargo Airships for Northern Operations Workshop, Anchorage, Alaska, 10-12 July 2013. http://event.arc.nasa.gov/airships/2013Workshop
[5]	Giesler, H. (2013) Access to the Arctic: Time to Try Something Different. Press Release (30 February), Hybrid Air Vehicles Ltd.
[6]	Hybrid Air Vehicles (undated) Civil Heavy Lift. http://www.hybridairvehicles.com/heavylift.aspx
[7]	Schechter, E. (2013) US Army Sells Cancelled LEMV Airship to Original Designer, Flight Global. http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/us-army-sells-cancelled- lemv-airship-to-original-designer-392226/
[8]	Pocock, C. (2013) Hybrid Air Vehicles Attempts to Revive Lighter-than-air Aircraft. Aviation International News (AIN). http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/dubai-air-show/2013-11-17/ hybrid-air-vehicles-attempts-revive-lighter-air-aircraft
[9]	Economist (2014) Inflated Ideas: Reviving Airships. 8 March. http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21598613- reviving-airships?frsc=dg%7Ca
[10]	Dornheim, M.S. (2006) Lockheed Martin’s Secretly Built Airship Makes First Flight. Aviation Week. http://www.aviationweek.com/
[11]	Transportes Bertolini (2013) Airship compra area para produzir dirigiveis. http://www.tbl.com.br/noticias-detalhes-08.jsp
[12]	AAJ (2013) “Varialift Moves Manufacture to France”, Airship. The Journal of the Airship Association, Number 181, 18, September 2013.