Discrepancies in Growth Measurement Methods of Mosses: An Example from Two Keystone Species Grown under Increased CO₂ and N Supply in a Restored Peatland

Andy Siegenthaler, Alexandre Buttler, Philippe Grosvernier, Jean-Michel Gobat, Edward Mitchell

Laboratory of Soil Biology, University of Neuchatel, Neuchatel, Switzerland.
Laboratory Soil & Vegetation, University of Neuchatel, Neuchatel, Switzerland.
LIN’eco, Reconvilier, Switzerland.
Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Lausanne, Switzerland.

DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2014.515249                

Abstract

Bryophytes dominate northern peatlands. Obtaining reliable measurements of moss-growth and how it may be affected by global changes are therefore important. Several methods have been used to measure moss-growth but it is unclear how comparable they are in different conditions and this uncertainty undermines comparisons among studies. In a field experiment we measured the growth and production of Sphagnum fallax (Sphagnum) and Polytrichum strictum (Polytrichum) using two handling methods, using cut and uncut plants, and three growth-variables, height-growth, length-growth, and mass-growth. We aimed “benchmarking” a combination of six methodological options against exactly the same set of factorial experiments: atmospheric CO₂ enrichment and N addition. The two handling methods produced partly different results: in half of the cases, one method revealed a significant treatment effect but the other one did not: significant negative effects on growth were only observed on uncut plants for elevated CO₂ and on cut plants for N addition. Furthermore, the correspondence between measurements made with various growth-variables depended on the species and, to a lesser extent, treatments. Sphagnum and Polytrichum growth was inhibited under elevated CO₂, and correlated to higher ammonium values. Sphagnum was however less affected than Polytrichum and the height difference between the two species decreased. N addition reduced the P/N ratio and probably induced P-limiting conditions. Sphagnum growth was more inhibited than Polytrichum and the height difference between the two species increased. Our data show that such a problem indeed exists between the cut and uncut handling methods. Not only do the results differ in absolute terms by as much as 82% but also do their comparisons and interpretations depend on the handling method—and thus the interpretation would be biased—in half of the cases. These results call for caution when comparing factorial studies based on different handling methods.

Keywords

Mosses, Growth-Measurement Methods, Elevated CO₂ and N Deposition, Polytrichum, Sphagnum, Peatland Restoration, Nutrient Availability

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Post, W., et al. (1982) Soil Carbon Pools and World Life Zones. Nature, 298, 156-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/298156a0
[2]	Siegenthaler, A., et al. (2013) Factors Modulating Cottongrass Seedling Growth Stimulation to Enhanced Nitrogen and Carbon Dioxide: Compensatory Tradeoffs in Leaf Dynamics and Allocation to Meet Potassium-Limited Growth. Oecologia, 171, 557-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2415-8
[3]	Buttler, A., Grosvernier, P. and Matthey, Y. (1998) Development of Sphagnum fallax Diaspores on Bare Peat with Implications for the Restoration of Cut-Over Bogs. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35, 800-810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.355351.x
[4]	Groeneveld, E.V.G., Masse, A. and Rochefort, L. (2007) Polytrichum strictum as a Nurse-Plant in Peatland Restoration. Restoration Ecology, 15, 709-719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00283.x
[5]	Grosvernier, P., Matthey, Y. and Buttler, A. (1995) Microclimate and Physical Properties of Peat: New Clues to the Understanding of Bog Restoration Processes. In: Wheeler, B.D., et al., Eds., The Restoration of Temperate Wetlands, Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 437-450.
[6]	Lee, J.A., Tallis, J.H. and Woodin, S.J. (1998) Acidic Deposition and British Upland Vegetation, in Ecological Change in the Uplands. In: Usher, M.B. and Thompson, D.B.A., Eds., Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 151-162.
[7]	Steinnes, E., et al. (1994) Atmospheric Deposition of Trace-Elements in Norway—Temporal and Spatial Trends Studied by Moss Analysis. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 74, 121-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01257151
[8]	Aro, E.M., Gerbaud, A. and Andre, M. (1984) CO2 and O2 Exchange in Two Mosses, Hypnum cupressiforme and Dicranum scoparium. Plant Physiology, 76, 431-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.76.2.431
[9]	Touffet, J. (1987) Etude expérimentale de l’influence de la nature et de la concentration minérale du milieu sur le développement et la teneur en cations des sphaignes. Botanica Rhedonica, Série A, 10, 293-302.
[10]	Austin, K.A. and Wieder, R.K. (1987) Effects of Elevated H+, , and in Simulated Acid Precipitation on the Growth and Chlorophyll Content of 3 North America Sphagnum Species. Bryologist, 90, 221-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3242930
[11]	Aerts, R., Wallen, B. and Malmer, N. (1992) Growth-Limiting Nutrients in Sphagnum-Dominated Bogs Subject to Low and High Atmospheric Nitrogen Supply. Journal of Ecology, 80, 131-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2261070
[12]	Twenhöven, F.L. (1992) Competition between Two Sphagnum Species under Different Deposition Levels. Journal of Bryology, 17, 71-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/jbr.1992.17.1.71
[13]	Jauhiainen, J., Vasander, H. and Silvola, J. (1994) Response of Sphagnum fuscum to N Deposition and Increased CO2. Journal of Bryology, 18, 83-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/jbr.1994.18.1.83
[14]	Van der Heijden, E., et al. (1998) Effects of Elevated CO2 and Nitrogen Deposition on Sphagnum Species, in Responses of Plant to Air Pollution and Global Change. In: De Kok, L.J. and Stulen, I., Eds., Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 475-478.
[15]	Heijmans, M., et al. (2001) Effects of Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Increased Nitrogen Deposition on Bog Vegetation in the Netherlands. Journal of Ecology, 89, 268-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00547.x
[16]	Hoosbeek, M.R., Van Breemen, N., Vasander, H., Buttler, A. and Berendse, F. (2002) Potassium Limits Potential Growth of Bog Vegetation under Elevated Atmospheric CO2 and N Deposition. Global Change Biology, 8, 1130-1138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00535.x
[17]	Limpens, J., Berendse, F. and Klees, H. (2004) How Phosphorus Availability Affects the Impact of Nitrogen Deposition on Sphagnum and Vascular Plants in Bogs. Ecosystems, 7, 793-804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10021-004-0274-9
[18]	Bubier, J.L., Moore, T.R. and Bledzki, L.A. (2007) Effects of Nutrient Addition on Vegetation and Carbon Cycling in an Ombrotrophic Bog. Global Change Biology, 13, 1168-1186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01346.x
[19]	Wieder, R.K., Burke-Scoll, M., Scott, K.D., House, M. and Vile, M.A. (2010) Nitrogen and Sulphur Deposition and the Growth of Sphagnum fuscum in Bogs of the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Alberta. Journal of Limnology, 69, 161-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2010.s1.161
[20]	Breeuwer, A., Robroek, B.J.M., Limpens, J., Heijmans, M.M.P.D., Schouten, M.G.C. and Berendse, F. (2009) Decreased Summer Water Table Depth Affects Peatland Vegetation. Basic and Applied Ecology, 10, 330-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2008.05.005
[21]	Mitchell, E.A.D., Buttler, A., Grosvernier, P., Rydin, H., Siegenthaler, A. and Gobat, J.M. (2002) Contrasted Effects of Increased N and CO2 Supply on Two Keystone Species in Peatland Restoration and Implications for Global Change. Journal of Ecology, 90, 529-533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00679.x
[22]	Toet, S., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Aerts, R., van Logtestijn, R.S.P., de Beus, M. and Stoevelaar, R. (2006) Moss Responses to Elevated CO2 and Variation in Hydrology in a Temperate Lowland Peatland. Plant Ecology, 182, 27-40.
[23]	Jäppinen, J.P. and Hotanen, J.P. (1990) Effect of Fertilization on the Abundance of Bryophytes in Two Drained Peatland Forests in Eastern Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici, 27, 93-108.
[24]	Limpens, J., Granath, G., Aerts, R., Heijmans, M.M.P.D., Sheppard, L.J., Bragazza, L., Williams, B.L., et al. (2012) Glasshouse vs Field Experiments: Do They Yield Ecologically Similar Results for Assessing N Impacts on Peat Mosses? The New Phytologist, 195, 408-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04157.x
[25]	Overbeck, F. and Happach, H. (1956) über das Wachstum und den Wasserhaushalteiniger Hochmoorsphagnen. Flora Jena, 144, 355-402.
[26]	Clymo, R.S. (1970) The Growth of Sphagnum: Methods and Measurement. Journal of Ecology, 58, 13-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2258168
[27]	Taub, D.R. and Wang, X.Z. (2008) Why Are Nitrogen Concentrations in Plant Tissues Lower under Elevated CO2? A Critical Examination of the Hypotheses. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 50, 1365-1374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00754.x
[28]	Van Breemen, N. (1995) How Sphagnum Bogs down Other Plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10, 270-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(95)90007-1
[29]	Nabel (1995) Air Pollution: Measurements Made by the National Survey Network of Atmospheric Pollutants. Federal Service for Environment, Forest and Landscape, Bern.
[30]	Miglietta, F., Hoosbeek, M.R., Foot, J., Gigon, F., Hassinen, A., Heijmans, M., Peressotti, A., Saarinen, T., van Breemen, N. and Wallén, B. (2001) Spatial and Temporal Performance of the MiniFACE (Free Air CO2 Enrichment) System on Bog Ecosystems in Northern and Central Europe. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 66, 107-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026495830251
[31]	Buurman, P., van Lagen, B. and Velthorst, E.J. (1996) Manual for Soil and Water Analysis. Backhuys, Leiden.
[32]	Francez, A.J. (1992) Croissanceet production primaire des sphaignesdansunetourbière des Monts du Forez (Puy-de-Dome, France). Vie et Milieu, 42, 21-34.
[33]	Wallen, B., Falkengren-Grerup, U. and Malmer, N. (1988) Biomass, Productivity and Relative Rate of Photosynthesis of Sphagnum at Different Water Levels on a South Swedish Peat Bog. Holarctic Ecology, 11, 70-76.
[34]	Clymo, R.S. (1973) The Growth of Sphagnum: Some Effects of Environment. Journal of Ecology, 61, 849-869. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2258654
[35]	Press, M., Woodin, S. and Lee, J. (1996) The Potential Importance of an Increased Atmospheric Nitrogen Supply to the Growth of Ombrotrophic Sphagnum Species. New Phytologist, 103, 45-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1986.tb00595.x
[36]	Rudolph, H. and Voigt, J.U. (1986) Effects of and on Growth and Metabolism of Sphagnum magellanicum. Physiologia Plantarum, 66, 339-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1986.tb02429.x
[37]	Baxter, R., Emes, M.J. and Lee, J.A. (1992) Effects of an Experimentally Applied Increase in Ammonium on Growth and Amino-Acid Metabolism of Sphagnum cuspidatum Ehrh. ex. Hoffm. from Differently Polluted Areas. New Phytologist, 120, 265-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb05663.x
[38]	Pakarinen, P. and Tolonen, K. (1977) Nutrient Contents of Sphagnum Mosses in Relation to Bog Water Chemistry in Northern Finland. Lindbergia, 4, 27-33.
[39]	Chapin, F.S. (1988) Ecological Aspects of Plant Mineral Nutrition. Advances in Plant Nutrition, 3, 161-191.
[40]	Chapin, F.S., Vitousek, P.M. and Van Cleve, K. (1986) The Nature of Nutrient Limitations in Plant Communities. American Naturalist, 127, 48-58.
[41]	Proctor, M.C.F. (1997) Aspects of Water Chemistry in Relation to Surface Degradation on Ombrotrophic Mires. In: Tallis, J.H., Meade, R. and Hulme, P.D., Eds., Blanket Mire Degradation Causes, Consequences and Challenges, British Ecological Society, London, 140-152.
[42]	Cresser, M., et al. (1997) The Physical and Chemical Stability of Ombrogenous Mires in Response to Changes in Precipitation Chemistry. In: Tallis, J., Meade, R. and Hulme, P., Eds., Blanket Mire Degradation Causes, Consequences and Challenges, The Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Aberdeen, 153-159.
[43]	Pouliot, R., Marchand-Roy, M., Rochefort, L. and Gauthier, G. (2010) Estimating Moss Growth in Arctic Conditions: A Comparison of Three Methods. The Bryologist, 113, 322-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745-113.2.322