Alternative Approaches for Distinguishing between Faults and Inrush Current in Power Transformers

Abstract

In this study, we will cover the basic methods used to distinguish between inrush current and fault current in power transformers. First, the nature of inrush current is presented compared to the fault current. Then the nature of the magnetizing current due to energizing a power transformer at no-load is explained. The first generation of methods used to disable the protective relay system during inrush current, namely the Desensitizing and Tripping Suppressor, is introduced. The second generation, the harmonic restraint method and the waveform-based restraint method with their different versions, is explained. Then we will explore thoroughly the fictitious equivalent resistance method as an example of the third generation of model type restraining or blocking methods. Finally, a comparison between these methods and conclusion is carried out.

Share and Cite:

Alomar, A. and Shamseldin, B. (2014) Alternative Approaches for Distinguishing between Faults and Inrush Current in Power Transformers. Energy and Power Engineering, 6, 143-160. doi: 10.4236/epe.2014.67014.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] IEEE Tutorial Course: Advancements in Microprocessors Based Protection and Communication (1997) IEEE Catalog No. 97TP120-0.
[2] Kasztenny, B., Rosoloeski, E., Saha, M.M. and Hillstrom, B. (1996) A Comparative Analysis of Protection Principles for Multi-Criteria Power Transformer Relaying. Proceedings of the 12th Power Systems Computation Conference, Dresden, 19-23 August 1996, 107-113.
[3] Habib, M. and Marin, M.A. (1988) A Comparative Analysis of Digital Relaying Algorithms for the Differential Protection of Three Phase Transformers. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 3, 1501-1508.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/59.14605
[4] Mason, C.R. (1986) The Art and Science of Protective Relaying. 2nd Edition, John Wiley, New York.
[5] Blume, L.F. (1951) Transformer Engineering, Wiley & Sons, New York.
[6] Karsai, K., Kerenyi, D. and Kiss, L. (1987) Large Power Transformers. Elsevier, New York.
[7] Bogdan, K. and Ara, K. An Improved Transformer Inrush Restraint Algorithm Increases Security While Maintaining Fault Response Performance. 53rd Annual Conference for Protective Relay Engineers.
[8] Horowitz, S.H. and Phadke, A.G. (1992) Power System Relaying, Wily & Sons, New York.
[9] Armando, G. (2001) A Current-Based Solution for Transformer Differential Protection. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 16, 485-491.
[10] Inagaki, K., Higaki, M., Matsui, Y., Kurita, K., Suzuki, M., Yushida, K. and Maeda, T. (1988) Digital Protection Method for Power Transformers Based on an Equivalent Circuit Composed of Inverse Inductance. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 3, 1501-1510.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/61.193949
[11] Yabe, K. (1997) Power Differential Method for Discrimination between Fault and Magnetizing Inrush Current in Transformers. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 12, 1109-1118.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/61.636909
[12] Grcar, B., Stumberger, G. and Pehler, J. (1996) Transformer Protection Based on the New Theoretical Background and with Improved Inrush Recognition. Proceedings of 12th PSCC, 101-106.
[13] Kasztenny, B., Rosolowski, E., Saha, M. and Hillstrom, B. (1996) A Comparative Analysis of Protection Principles for Multi-Criteria Power Transformers Relaying. Proceedings of 12th PSCC, 107-113.
[14] Guocai, S. and Dachan, Y. (2000) Identifying Internal Faults of Transformers through the Similarity Degree between Voltage and Current. Proceedings of IEEE/PES 2000 Winter Meeting, 1151-1156.
[15] Gomez-Morante, M. and Necoletti, D.W. (1999) A Wavelet-Based Differential Transformer Protection. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 14, 1351-1358.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/61.796228
[16] Koda, J. and Yabe, K. (1997) Dynamic Estimation of Magnetizing Curve for Transformer Protection Relay. Proceedings of the ICEE, E02, 94-97.
[17] Sng, Y. and Wang, Q. (2000) A Wavelet-Based Method to Discriminate between Inrush Current and Internal Fault. International Conference on Power System Technology, 2, 927-932.
[18] Giuliante, T. and Clough, G. (1995) Advances in the Design of Differential Protection for Power Transformers. Texas A&M University Conference for Protective Relay Engineers, College Station, 5 April 1995.
[19] Saied, M. (Not Published) A Method for Distinguishing between Faults and Inrush Phenomena in Power Transformers.
[20] Perez-Rojas, C. (2000) Fitting Saturation and Hysteresis via Arctangent Functions. IEEE Power Engineering Review, 20, 55-57.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.