Feasibility of Groundwater Banking under Various Hydrologic Conditions in California, USA

Saad Merayyan, Samsor Safi

California State University, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Sacramento Area Sewer District, Sacramento, CA, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/cweee.2014.33009                

Abstract

This study evaluates the feasibility of groundwater banking in the Central Basin. The Central Basin is located in Sacramento County in northern California, USA. The study basin is bounded by three rivers (the Sacramento, the American, the Consumes and Mokelumne rivers), and by the Sierra-Nevada mountain range. This study focuses on the potential for groundwater recharge in the Central Basin for three water years (critical, wet, above normal). For that purpose, a 3-D Groundwater Modeling System (GMS) with MODFLOW was created. Three recharge wells were added to the calibrated groundwater model to recharge the water table with 10,000 Acre-Feet (AF) of water to the Central Basin. The banking of 10,000 AF during the critical and wet years was effective in raising the water table elevation in the cone of depression area without causing any negative impact elsewhere in the basin. According to the findings of the Central Basin model, banking up to 10,000 AF of groundwater during any year type is feasible. More than 10,000 AF of groundwater banking might cause more negative impacts than positive benefits.

Keywords

Groundwater, Groundwater Banking, Groundwater Modeling, 3-D Groundwater, Hydrologic

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Central Sacramento County Groundwater Management Plan (CSCGMP) (2006).
[2]	California DWR (2004) California’s Groundwater: South American Groundwater Sub-Basins Number: 5-21.65. Bulletin 118-6.
[3]	California Department of Water Resource (DWR) (1974) Evaluation of Ground Water Resources: Sacramento County. Bulletin 118-3.
[4]	DWR (1978) Evaluation of Ground Water Resources: Sacramento Valley. Bulletin 118-6.
[5]	Natural Heritage Institute (NHI) (1998) Feasibility Study of a Maximal Program of Groundwater Banking.
[6]	Groundwater Modeling System (GMS) with MODFLOW software. Version 8.0. (2011) Aquaveo, LLC, Provo, Utah.
[7]	California DWR’s California Data Exchange Center Website. http://cdec.water.ca.gov/
[8]	City of Roseville (2010) Sacramento Regional Model Groundwater Modeling Report. Aquaveo LLC.
[9]	Morris, D.A. and Johnson, A.I. (1967) Summary of Hydrologic and Physical Properties of Rock and Soil Materials, as Analyzed by the Hydrologic Laboratory of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1948-1960. USGS Water Supply Paper: 1839-D.
[10]	Folsom Cordova Unified School District (2008) Geologic Hazard and Geotechnical Engineering Report. Wallace Kuhl & Associate Inc.
[11]	Youngdahl Consultating Group Inc. (2007) Geotechnical Engineering Study—Update 2007. Seasons at Laguna Ridge.
[12]	CSA Water Pipeline and Florin Road Sewer (2009) Geotechnical Baseline Report. ENGEO Inc.
[13]	Elk Grove Promenade Center (2006) Geotechnical Engineering Report. Wallace Kuhl & Associate Inc.
[14]	Sacramento Central Groundwater Authority (SCGA) (2008) Basin Management Report 2007-2008.
[15]	Aquaveo LLC (2011) GMS 8.0 Tutorials. Retrieved from Aquaveo Website. http://www.aquaveo.com/gms-learning
[16]	Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA) (2009) Appendix A: Groundwater Impact Analysis. Luhdorff & Scalmanini Consulting Engineers.
[17]	Sacramento County Regional Sanitation District (SRCSD) (2011) South Sacramento County Agriculture & Habitat Lands Recycled Water Project Programmatic Feasibility Study.