Public's Trade-off between a New Risk-based Airport Screening and Asserted Terror Risk Impact: A Stated Choice Survey from Norway
Knut Veisten, Stefan Flügel, Torkel Bjørnskau
DOI: 10.4236/jtts.2011.12003   PDF    HTML     4,911 Downloads   10,522 Views   Citations


This paper presents a survey-based economic evaluation of security measures protecting against the risk of aviation terrorism. A sample of Norwegians were asked to state their choices between different air travel al-ternatives, i.e. travel time, trip costs, fatalities in terrorist acts on air transport and type of passenger screen-ing. Screening was specified as either the current uniform screening or a new risk-based screening in which passengers are divided into three groups: high-risk, medium-risk and low-risk. Respondents were informed that risk-based screening implied they would have to identify themselves using a biometric identity card and that those not qualifying as low-risk passengers would be checked with body scanners. Our results indicate that the sampled passengers were very concerned about privacy. Maintaining existing uniform screening was preferred to a new risk-based screening system, even though risk-based screening was presented as poten-tially preventing future terrorist fatalities.

Share and Cite:

K. Veisten, S. Flügel and T. Bjørnskau, "Public's Trade-off between a New Risk-based Airport Screening and Asserted Terror Risk Impact: A Stated Choice Survey from Norway," Journal of Transportation Technologies, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2011, pp. 11-20. doi: 10.4236/jtts.2011.12003.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] D. Lyon, “Airport Screening, Surveillance and Social Sorting: Canadian Responses to 9/11 in Context,” Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Vol. 48, No. 3, 2006, pp. 397-411.
[2] M. B. Salter, “SeMS and Sensibility: Security Management Systems and the Management of Risk in the Ca-nadian Air Transport Security Authority,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 13, No. 6, 2007, pp. 389-398. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2007.07.004
[3] R. W. Poole, Jr., “Toward risk-based aviation security policy?” Discussion Pa-per No. 2008-23, prepared for the OECD/ITF Round Table of 11-12 December 2008 on Security, Risk Perception and Cost-Benefit Analysis, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 2008.
[4] A. Ghobrial and W. A. Irvin, “Combating Air Terrorism: Some Implications to the Aviation Industry,” Journal of Air Transportation, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2004, pp. 67-86.
[5] P. Seidenstat, “Terrorism, Airport Security, and the Private Sector,” Review of Policy Research, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2004, pp. 275-291. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00075.x
[6] G. Blalock, V. Kadiyali and D. H. Simon, “The Impact of Post-9/11 Airport Security Measures on the Demand for Air Travel,” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2007, pp. 731-755. doi:10.1086/519816
[7] V. K. Viscusi and R. J. Zeckhauser, “Sacrificing Civil Liberties to Reduce Terrorism Risks,” Jour-nal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 26, No. 2-3, 2003, pp. 99-120. doi:10.1023/A:1024111622266
[8] J. Akhtar, T. Bj?rnskau and K. Veisten, “Assessing Security Measures Reducing Ter-rorist Risk: Inverse Expost Cost-Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Norwegian Airports and Seaports,” Journal of Transportation Security, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2010, pp. 179-195. doi:10.1007/s12198-010-0046-z
[9] L. A. McLay, S. H. Ja-cobson and J. E. Kobza, “The Tradeoff Between Technology and Prescreening Intelligence in Checked Baggage Screening for Aviation Security,” Journal of Transportation Security, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2008, pp. 107-126. doi:10.1007/s12198-007-0010-8
[10] R. W. Poole Jr. and G. Passantino, “A risk-based airport security policy,” Policy Study No. 308, Reason Public Policy Institute, Reason Foundation, Los Angeles, 2003.
[11] R. W. Poole Jr., “Airport Security: Time for a New Model,” Policy Study No. 340, Reason Public Policy Institute, Reason Foundation, Los Angeles, 2006.
[12] B. S. Frey, S. Luechinger and A. Stutzer, “Calcu-lating Tragedy: Assessing the Costs of Terrorism,” CESifo Working Paper No. 1341, Center for Economic Studies, Ifo Institute for Economic Research e.V., University of Munich, Munich, November 2004.
[13] W. Peissl, “Surveillance and Security: A Dodgy Relationship,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2003, pp. 19-24(6).
[14] P. H. O’Neil, “Complexity and Counterterror-ism: Think- ing about Biometrics,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Vol. 28, 2005, pp. 547-566. doi:10.1080/10576100591008962
[15] T. Ojanen, “Terrorist Profiling: Human Rights Concerns,” Critical Studies on Ter-rorism, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2010, pp. 295-312. doi:10.1080/17539153.2010.491343
[16] N. Robinson, D. Potoglou, C. Kim, P. Burge and R. Warnes, “Security, at what cost? Quantifying people’s trade-offs across liberty, privacy and security,” Technical Report, RAND Europe, Cambridge, 2010.
[17] D. Potoglou, N. Robinson, C. W. Kim, P. Burge and R. Warnes, “Quantifying Individuals’ Trade-offs Between Privacy, Liberty and Security: The Case of Rail Travel in UK,” Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2010, pp. 169-181. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2009.12.006
[18] V. K. Smith, C. Mansfield and L. Clayton, “Valuing a Homeland Security Pol-icy: Countermeasures for the Threats from Shoulder Mounted Missiles,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2009, pp. 215-243. doi:10.1007/s11166-009-9069-x
[19] N. O. Keohane and R. J. Zeckhauser, “The Ecology of Terror Defense,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 26, No. 2-3, 2003, pp. 201-229. doi:10.1023/A:1024167124083
[20] M. G. Stewart and J. Mueller, “Assessing the Risks, Costs and Benefits of United States Aviation Security Measures,” Research Report No. 267.04.08, Centre for Infrastructure Performance and Reli-ability, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, 2004.
[21] M. W. Jones-Lee, “The Value of Changes in the ProbAbility of Death or Injury,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82, No. 4, 1974, pp. 835-849. doi:10.1086/260238
[22] L. A. Robinson, “How Federal Agen-cies Value Mortality Risk,” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, in press.
[23] T. Brück and B.-A. Wickstr?m, “The Economic Consequences of Terror: Guest Editors’ Introduc-tion,” European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2004, pp. 293-300.
[24] B. S. Frey and S. Luechinger, “Meas-uring Terrorism,” In: A. Marciano and J.-M. Josselin, Eds., Law and the State: A Political Economy Approach, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham, 2005, pp. 142-181.
[25] J. Rosen, “The Naked Crowd: Balancing Privacy and Security in an Age of Terror,” Arizona Law Review, Vol. 46, 2004, pp. 607-619.
[26] N. Garoupa, J. Klick and F. Parisi, “A Law and Economics Perspective on Terrorism,” Public Choice, Vol. 128, No. 1-2, 2006, pp. 147-168. doi:10.1007/s11127-006-9058-4
[27] I. J. Bateman, R. T. Carson, B. Day, W. M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, T. Hett, M. Jones-Lee, G. Loomes, S. Mourato, E. Ozdemerioglu, D. W. Pearce, R. Sugden and J. Swanson, “Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual,” Edward Elgar, Ltd., Cheltenham, 2002.
[28] D. McFadden, “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour,” In: P. Zarembka, Ed., Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1974, pp. 105-142.
[29] M. Ben-Akiva and S. R. Lerman, “Discrete Choice Analysis,” MIT Press, Cambridge, 1985.
[30] L. I. Rizzi and J. de D. Ortúzar, “Stated Preference in the Valuation of Interurban Road Safety,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2003, 9-22. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00082-3
[31] S. Bhattacharya, “The Value of Mortality Risk Reductions in Delhi, India,” Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of the Graduate School, University of Maryland, Maryland, 2006.
[32] W. K. Viscusi and J. E. Aldy, “The Value of a Statistical life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates throughout the World,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2003, pp. 5-76. doi:10.1023/A:1025598106257
[33] M. Svensson, “What is a Life Worth? Methodological Issues in Estimating the Value of a Statistical Life,” Ph.D. dissertation, ?rebro Studies in Economics, ?rebro University, ?rebro, 2007.
[34] H. Samstad, F. Ramjerdi, K. Veisten, S. Navrud, K. Magnussen, S. Flügel, M. Killi, A. H. Halse, R. Elvik and O. San Martín, “Values of Time, Safety and Environment in Norwegian Passenger Transport,” T?I Report 1053, Institute of Transport Economics (T?I), Oslo, 2010.
[35] G. LaFree, L. Dugan, H. V. Fogg and J. Scott, “Building a Global Terrorism Database,” Report to U.S. Department of Justice (Doc. No. 214260), University of Maryland, Baltimore, 27 April 2006.
[36] PGIS, “Global terrorism database 1998-2004. GTD2, Codebook, Draft1.0,” Pinkerton Global Intelligence Ser- vices, Washington DC, May 2007.
[37] A. Amundsen, “Nordmenn og svenskers syn p? per- son- vern, sikkerhetstiltak og terrortrusselen: unders?k- else blant passasjerer p? fly, ferje og tog,” T?I Working Paper SM-2091, Institute of Transport Economics (T?I), Oslo, 2009.
[38] D. A. Hensher, J. M. Rose and W. H. Greene, “The Im- plications of Willingness to Pay of Respondents Ig- noring Specific Attributes,” Transportation, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2005, pp. 203-222. doi:10.1007/s11116-004-7613-8
[39] M. Bierlaire, “BIOGEME: A Free Package for the Esti- mation of Discrete Choice Models,” Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, 19-21 March 2003, pp. 24.
[40] J. G. Leo and J. P. Lawler, “A Study of Passenger Perception and Sensitivity to Airport Backscatter X-ray Technologies,” International Business & Economics Research Journal, Vol. 6, No. 7, 2007, pp. 11-18.
[41] F. Carlsson, O. Johansson-Stenman and P. Martinsson, “Is Transport Safety More Valuable in the Air?” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2004, pp. 147-163. doi:10.1023/B:RISK.0000016141.88127.7c
[42] S. M. Chilton, M. W. Jones-Lee, F. Kiraly, H. Metcalf and W. Pang, “Dread Risk,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2006, pp. 165-182. doi:10.1007/s11166-006-0483-z
[43] J. K. Hammitt, “Valuing Mortality Risk: Theory and Practice,” Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 34, No. 8, 2000, pp. 1396-1400. doi:10.1021/es990733n
[44] R. T. Carson, N. E. Flores and N. F. Meade, “Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence,” Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2001, pp. 173-210.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.