&& document.cookie != '') { // var cookies = document.cookie.split(';'); //将获得的所有cookie切割成数组 // for (var i = 0; i < cookies.length; i++) { // var cookie = cookies[i]; //得到某下标的cookies数组 // if (cookie.substring(0, cookieName.length + 2).trim() == cookieName.trim() + "=") {//如果存在该cookie的话就将cookie的值拿出来 // cookieValue = cookie.substring(cookieName.length + 2, cookie.length); // break // } // } // } // if (cookieValue != "" && cookieValue != null) {//如果存在指定的cookie值 // return false; // } // else { // // return true; // } // } // function ShowTwo(webUrl){ // alert("22"); // $.funkyUI({url:webUrl,css:{width:"600",height:"500"}}); // } //window.onload = pdfdownloadjudge;
CE> Vol.5 No.12, June 2014
Share This Article:
Cite This Paper >>

Evaluation by Rubrics: A Computerized System

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:2532KB) PP. 1091-1105
DOI: 10.4236/ce.2014.512124    3,109 Downloads   4,099 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment
Juan Cristobal Barrón, Humberto Blanco, José René Blanco, Judith M. Rodríguez-Villalobos, Jesús Viciana

Affiliation(s)

Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Faculty of Physical Culture Sciences, Autonomous University of Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

This report details a computerized system that allows teachers to use rubrics as a means of evaluation in a curriculum competency. The computerized system for evaluation by rubrics allows you to design them, modify them, and generate a bank with them so that they can be used later. It is a software that allows you to assess, co-assess, and self-assess either team or individually, the evidence of learning in a course through rubrics and represents an example of how the proper use of the new technologies can become a differentiating factor assessment process of learning about traditional evaluative practices by providing tools that allow use of time and material resources in a more effective and efficient manner both, for the teacher and the student.

KEYWORDS

Rubrics, Curriculum Competency, Software, New Technologies

Cite this paper

Barrón, J. , Blanco, H. , Blanco, J. , Rodríguez-Villalobos, J. and Viciana, J. (2014) Evaluation by Rubrics: A Computerized System. Creative Education, 5, 1091-1105. doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.512124.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Beltrán, J. A. (2011). La educación inclusiva. Padres y Maestros, 338, 5-9.
[2] Beltrán, J. A. (2013). La educación como cambio. Revista española de pedagogía, 71, 101-118.
[3] Ishiyama, J., & Watson, W. L. (2014). Using Computer-Based Writing Software to Facilitate Writing Assignments in Large Political Science Classes. Journal of Political Science Education, 10, 93-101.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2013.859085
[4] Jonassen, D. H. (2014). Assessing Problem Solving. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 269-288). New York: Springer.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_22
[5] Lei, J., Shen, J., & Johnson, L. (2014). Digital Technologies and Assessment in the Twenty-First-Century Schooling. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, 41, 185-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2748-9_13
[6] Marín, R., Guzmán, I., & Castro, G. (2012). Diseño y validación de un instrumento para la evaluación de competencias en preescolar. Revista Electrónica De Investigación Educativa, 14, 182-202.
[7] Petropoulou, O., Vassilikopoulou, M., & Retalis, S. (2011). Enriched Assessment Rubrics: A New Medium for Enabling Teachers to Easily Assess Student’s Performance When Participating in Complex Interactive Learning Scenarios. Operational Research, 11, 171-186.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12351-009-0047-5
[8] Prieto, G., Carro, J., Orgaz, B., Pulido, R. F., & González-Tablas, M. (1993). Uso del hypercard para la construcción de tests informatizados de aptitudes espaciales. Psicológica, 14, 229-237.
[9] Roehrig, G. H., Groos, D., & Guzey, S. S. (2014). Developing Collective Decision-Making Through Future Learning Environments. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, 41, 227-242.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2748-9_16
[10] Roland, J. (2006). Measuring up: Online Technology Assessment Tools Ease the Teacher’s Burden and Help Students Learn. Learning & Leading with Technology, 34, 12-17.
[11] Singley, M. K., & Taft, H. L. (1995). Open-Ended Approaches to Science Assessment Using Computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4, 7-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02211577
[12] Warren, S. J., Lee, J., & Najmi, A. (2014). The Impact of Technology and Theory on Instructional Design Since 2000. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 89-99). New York: Springer.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_8.

  
comments powered by Disqus
CE Subscription
E-Mail Alert
CE Most popular papers
Publication Ethics & OA Statement
CE News
Frequently Asked Questions
Recommend to Peers
Recommend to Library
Contact Us

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.