Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions on Forces in Equilibrium: An Action Research Study

Lilia Halim, Tan Kia Yong, Tamby Subahan Mohd Meerah

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia.

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2014.511117                

Abstract

This collaborative action research involving a supervisor and a student teacher aims to assist 23 Form Four (16 years old) students to overcome their misconceptions on the topic of forces in equilibrium state. This study adopts the action research cycle: Identify-Plan-Act-Reflect. The pre-test results showed that students had problems in recognizing the forces. Consequently, a teaching intervention was planned and carried out to improve students’ ability to identify and recognize the forces that exist for an object in the equilibrium state. The teaching intervention emphasizes on the basic characteristics of the force arrow namely the direction, magnitude, labeling and starting point of force. The post test results showed that students’ ability to draw the force arrows correctly had improved, with the exception of identifying the starting point of force. The action research study managed to guide the student teacher to identify and help to overcome misconceptions of her students.

Keywords

Collaborative Action Research, Students’ Misconception, Teaching Instruction, Physics, Forces

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Abell, S. K. & Lederman, N. G. (2007). Handbook of Research on Science Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
[2]	Brown, D. E. (1987). Using Analogies and Example to Help Students Overcome Misconception in Physics: A Comparison of Two Teaching Strategies. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis of Education, Amherst, MA: University of Massachussetts.
[3]	Chambers, S. K., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, Prior Knowledge, Interest, and Experience in Electricity and Conceptual Change Text Manipulations in Learning about Direct Current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 107-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<107::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-X
[4]	David, R. W. (2008). Science Discrepant Events and Critical Thinking: Using Surprising Phenomena to Focus Students’ Attention in Science. http://teachertipstraining.suite101.com/article.cfm/ science_discrepant_events_and_critical_thinking#ixzzWwBWODcg
[5]	Demirci, N. (2005). A Study about Students’ Misconceptions in Force and Motion Concepts by Incorporating a Web-Assisted Physics Program. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4, 40-49.
[6]	Gunstone, R. F. (1995). The Importance of Specific Science Content in the Enhancement of Metacognition. In P. J. Fensham, R. F. Gunstone, & R. T. White (Eds.), The Content of Science: A Constructivism Approach to Its Teaching and Learning (pp. 131-146). London: The Falmer Press.
[7]	Halim, A., Meerah, T., & Halim, L. (2009). Development and Application of Diagnostic Test to Identify Students’ Miscon- ception on Quantum Physics. Sains Malaysiana, 38, 543-551.
[8]	Hammer, D. (1996). More than Misconceptions: Multiple Perspectives on Student Knowledge and Reasoning, and an Ap- propriate Role for Education Research. American Journal of Physics, 64, 1316-1325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18376
[9]	James, R., & Lamb, C. (2000). Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Technology in Middle School Technology-Rich Environments. A Study of Implementation and Change. School Science and Mathematics, 100, 27-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17317.x
[10]	Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2001). Computer Simulations in Physics Teaching and Learning: A Case Study on Students’ Understanding of Trajectory Motion. Journal of Computers & Education, 36, 183-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00059-2
[11]	Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science Teaching and the Development of Thinking. Belmont, CA: Watsworth Publishing Company.
[12]	McKinney, K. (2004). How Sociology Majors Learn Sociology: Successful Learners Tell Their Story. Journal of Scholar- ship of Teaching and Learning, 4, 15-24.
[13]	Muller, D. A., Bewes, J., Sharma, M. D., & Reimann, P. (2007). Saying the Wrong Thing: Improving Learning with Multi- media by Including Misconceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 144-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00248.x
[14]	Osman, K., Halim, L., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2006). What Malaysian Science Teachers Need to Improve Their Science In- structions: A Comparison a Cross Gender, School Location and Area of Specialization. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2, 58-81.
[15]	Sencar, S., & Eryilmaz, A. (2004). Factors Mediating the Effect of Gender on Ninth-Grade Turkish Students’ Misconceptions Concerning Electric Circuits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 603-616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20016
[16]	Styer, F. D. (1995). Common Misconceptions Regarding Quantum Mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 64, 31-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18288
[17]	Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). Assessing Student Learning of Newton’s Laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66, 338-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18863
[18]	Tsai, C. C. (1999). Overcoming Junior High School Students’ Misconceptions about Microscopic Views of Phase Change: A Study of an Analogy Activity. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 83-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009485722628
[19]	Weaver, G. C. (2000). An Examination of the National Educational Longitudinal Study (NELS: 1. Database to Probe the Correlation between Computer Use in School and Improvement in Test Scores. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9, 121-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009457603800
[20]	Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does It Compute? The Relationship between Educational Technology and Student Achievement in Mathematics. Princeton, NJ: ETS Policy Information Center.
[21]	Wong, T. K., & Sulaiman, S. (2008). The Level of Alternative Framework among Form Five Science Stream Students on the Topic of Buoyancy. National Conference of Science and Mathematics Education, Johor, Malaysia. http://eprints.utm.my/7669/