Group Dynamics in On-Line and Face-to-Face Interactions: An Experimental Study on Learning Methods

DOI: 10.4236/sm.2011.12008   PDF   HTML     6,856 Downloads   12,825 Views   Citations


Organizing in groups does not represent an objective definition, but rather a way to better understand the mean-ing of plurality. At the same time modern technologies modify perceptive and cognitive transformation. This re-search shows that on-line groups develop objective dynamics in face-to-face groups; it evaluates the quality of the University student services and studies the dynamics of the creation of face-to-face and on-line groups. Stu-dents were divided into experimental on-line (forum, chat, newsgroup) and face-to-face encounters (seminars, laboratories). The two level analyses show the defence mechanisms, the lack of socialization attitudes and the tolerance of differences that characterized on-line groups. The new technologies open new horizons and cogni-tive functions.

Share and Cite:

Severino, S. & Messina, R. (2011). Group Dynamics in On-Line and Face-to-Face Interactions: An Experimental Study on Learning Methods. Sociology Mind, 1, 65-73. doi: 10.4236/sm.2011.12008.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Abruzzese, A. (2003). Lessico della comunicazione (a cura di Giordano V.). Roma: Meltemi.
[2] Ambrosini, M., & Benini, S. (2000). Virtual Groups and Group Dy- namics in Innovative Theories, Tools, and Practises in Work and Organizational Psychology, a cura di Vartiainen, Avallone, Ander- son. Toronto: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.
[3] Asch, S. E., (1952). Social psychology. Englewood: Prentice-Hall. doi:10.1037/10025-000
[4] Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[5] Barcellona, P., De, G. R., & Natoli, S. (2003). Fine della storia e mondo come sistema, tesi sulla post-modernità. Bari: Dedalo.
[6] Bauman, Z. (2002). Modernità liquida. Bari: Laterza.
[7] Boca, S., Pace, U., & Severino, S. (2009). Apprendimento, relazioni sociali e nuove tecnologie. Milano: Edizioni Unicopoli.
[8] Bouas, K. S., & Arrow, H. (1996). The development of group identity of group identity in computer and face-to-face groups with membership change. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4, 156-178. doi:10.1007/BF00749745
[9] Bruner, J. S. (1992). La ricerca del significato (pp. 104-105). Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
[10] Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991) The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Human Computer Interaction.
[11] Durkheim, (1893). De la division du travail social, Alcan, Paris; tr. it. La divisione del lavoro sociale. Milano: Comunità.
[12] Federici, R., (2003). Elementi sociologici della comunicazione nella società post-moderna. Perugia: Morlacchi.
[13] Giddens A. (1994). Le conseguenze della modernità. Bologna: Il Mulino.
[14] Green, A. S., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2002). The internet attentuates. The effect of social anxiety. New York University.
[15] Haney, C., Banks, W. C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminol- ogy and Penology, 1, 69-97.
[16] Katelyn, Y. A. M., & Amie S. G. (2002). Virtual group dynamics group. Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 6, 116-127.
[17] Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organization Com- puting, 2, 321-342. doi:10.1080/10919399209540190
[18] Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science, teoria e speriment- azione in psicologia sociale. Bologna: Il Mulino.
[19] Lipoma, M., & Severino, S. (2008). Metodologia e tecnica del lavoro di gruppo e del gruppo in lavoro. Enna: La Moderna.
[20] Luhmann, N. (1984) Stato di diritto e sistema sociale. Napoli: trad. italiana Spalla F., Guida.
[21] Lyotard, J. F. (1981). La condizione postmoderna. Rapporto sul sapere. Milano: Feltrinelli.
[22] Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, self, and society: from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. USA: University of Chicago.
[23] Michinov, N., Michinov, E., & Toczek-Capelle, E. (2004). Social iden- tity, group processes, and performance in synchronous computer- mediated communication. Groups Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8, 27-39. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.8.1.27
[24] Pignato, S., & Severino, S. (2009). Apprendimento a distanza: la costruzione di un LOM (Learning Object Metadata). In S. Boca, U. Pace and S. Severino (Ed.), Apprendimento, relazioni sociali e nuove tecnologie. Milano: Edizioni Unicopoli.
[25] Roversi, A. (2004). La comunicazione mediata dal computer. Bologna: Il mulino.
[26] Ruggieri, S., & Pace, U. (2009) Il funzionamento psicosociale dei gruppi on line. In S. Boca, U. Pace and S. Severino (a cura di) (Eds.), Apprendimento, relazioni sociali e nuove tecnologie. Milano: Edizioni Unicopoli.
[27] Severino, S. (2008). La comunicazione del sapere a distanza. Enna: La Moderna.
[28] Severino, S., & Lipoma, M. (2008). Metodologia e tecnica del lavoro di gruppo e del gruppo in lavoro, materiali di conoscenza e per la formazione. Enna: La Moderna editori.
[29] Shaw, M. E. (1976). Group dynamics (2nd ed.). New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill.
[30] Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon & Shuster.
[31] Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social Identity and Inter Group Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[32] Tajifel, H. (1976). Psicologia sociale e processi sociali. In A. Palmonari (a cura di), Problemi attuali della psicologia sociale, Bologna: Il Mulino.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.