The Experience of Mammography Based on the Memoirs of Examinees

Mieko Uchiyama

Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.

DOI: 10.4236/health.2014.611160                

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to shed light on the pattern of the mammography experience from the examinee’s perspective based on episodic information extracted from notes written by the examinees. Using the notes is an effective approach to maintain privacy and avoid excessive stress. The study methods were qualitative inductive analyses of four sets of notes. Results showed that examinees “checked the words and actions of the medical staff” while relying on the “peace of mind instilled by the technician” before taking the mammogram. However, as breast compression became more intense, their feelings changed to a sense of “betrayal by someone on whom they were relying” since they felt that the technician was “ignoring the situation” or “considering but continuing breast compression”. They were also affected by the “shooting position which is impossible to avoid”. Breast compression during the mammography was a “pressure pain that exceeded their expectations” causing “dissatisfaction with the screening as a result of the pain” and “subconsciously created systemic tension”. Meanwhile, during the shooting, the examinees had performed “quiet countermeasures” such as “self-coping to distract themselves from the pain”. Examinees “earnestly desired a minimal shooting time” but, on the other hand, they also wanted “certainty of shooting rather than consideration of pain”. From these results, it is apparent that examinees were objectively observing the staff, even during shooting and the examinees were using self-coping measures to counter the pain. Providing support measures during mammography procedures is suggested based on the patterns of experiences.

Keywords

Breast Cancer, Mammography, Screening

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	OECD Indicators (2011) Screening, Survival and Mortality for Breast Cancer. OECD Publishing, 120-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2011-en
[2]	Gerald, G., Thaler, K., Chapman, A., Kaminski-Hartenthaler, A., Berzaczy, D., Van Noord, M.G. and Helbich, T.H. (2013) Mammography in Combination with Breast Ultrasonography versus Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Average Risk. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, 1-16.
[3]	Kawai, M., Kuriyama, S., Suzuki, A., Nishino, Y., Ishida, T., Ohnuki, K., Amari, M., Tsuji, I. and Ohuchi, N. (2009) Effect of Screening Mammography on Breast Cancersurvival in Comparison to Other Detection Methods: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Cancer Science, 100, 1479-1484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01212.x
[4]	Morimoto, T., Tangoku, A., Yamakawa, T., Tsuruno, M. and Takashima, S. (2012) Promotion of Quality-Controlled Mammography Alone as a Screening Modality in Japan. Breast Cancer, 23, 1-7.
[5]	Ishikawa, Y., Hirai, K., Saito, H., Fukuyoshi, J., Yonekura, A., Harada, K., Seki, A., Shibuya, D. and Nakamura, Y. (2012) Cost-Effectiveness of a Tailored Intervention Designed to Increase Breast Cancer Screening among a Non-Adherent Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial. BMC Public Health, 12, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-760
[6]	Uchida, K., Ohashi, H., Kinoshita, S., Nogi, H., Kato, K., Toriumi, Y., Yamashita, A., Kamio, M., Mimoto, R. and Takeyama, H. (2013) Breast Cancer Screening and the Changing Population Pyramid of Japan. Breast Cancer, 30, 1-5.
[7]	Tohno, E., Umemoto, T., Sasaki, K., Morishima, I. and Ueno, E. (2013) Effect of Adding Screening Ultrasonography to Screening Mammography on Patient Recall and Cancer Detection Rates: A Retrospective Study in Japan. European Journal of Radiology, 82, 1227-1230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.02.007
[8]	Bairati, I., Turcotte, S., Doray, G., Belleau, F. and Grégoire, L. (2014) Development and Validation of an Instrument Assessing Women’s Satisfaction with Screening Mammography in an Organized Breast Cancer Screening Program. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-9
[9]	Lambertz, C.K., Johnson, C.J., Montgomery, P.G. and Maxwell, J.R. (2008) Premedication to Reduce Discomfort during Screening Mammography. Radiology, 248, 765-772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2482071490
[10]	Uchiyama, M., Lee, Y., Kazama, K., Minagawa, Y., Tsai, D.Y., Sadakata, M. and Sayama, M. (2011) A Preliminary Study on Measurement of Muscle Activity during Mammography Positioning. Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology, 67, 679-682. http://dx.doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.67.679
[11]	Uchiyama, M., Lee, Y., Sadakata, M., Sayama, M. and Tsai, D.Y. (2012) Measurement of Muscle Activities for Evaluating Physical Burden and Pain during Mammography Positioning. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, 228, 53-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1620/tjem.228.53
[12]	Uchiyama, M., Lee, Y., Kazama, K., Minagawa, Y., Tsai, D.Y., Sadakata, M. and Sayama, M. (2012) Quantitative Assessment of Muscle Activity in Mammography Positioning. Proceedings of the XX IMEKO World Congress, Busan, 9-14 September 2012, TC13-P-1, 1-4.
[13]	Whelehan, P., Evans, A., Wells, M. and MacGillivray, S. (2013) The Effect of Mammography Pain on Repeat Participation in Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. The Breast, 22, 389-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2013.03.003
[14]	Uchiyama, M., Lee, Y., Sadakata, M., Tsai, D.Y. and Sayama, M. (2013) Effects of Mammography Positioning on the Autonomic Nervous Function. Health, 5, 1335-1341. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/health.2013.58181
[15]	Kasahara, Y., Kawai, M., Tsuji, I., Tohno, E., Yokoe, T., Irahara, M., Tangoku, A. and Ohuchi, N. (2013) Harms of Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer in Japanese Women. Breast Cancer, 20, 310-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-012-0333-6
[16]	Kikuchi, M., Tsunoda, H., Koyama, T., Kawakita, T., Suzuki, K., Yamauchi, H., Takahashi, O. and Saida, Y. (2014) Opportunistic Breast Cancer Screening by Mammography in Japan for Women in Their 40s at Our Preventive Medical Center: Harmor Benefit? Breast Cancer, 21, 135-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-012-0367-9
[17]	Groot, J.E., Broeders, M.J.M., Branderhorst, W., Heeten, G.J. and Grimbergen, C.A. (2014) Mammographic Compression after Breast Conserving Therapy: Controlling Pressure Instead of Force. Medical Physics, 41, 023501-1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4862512
[18]	Iwata, K., Shirai, C., Mimura, K., Muta, A., Doi, A., Oba, Y., Oka, H., Ohji, G. and Saijo, T. (2010) How Were the High-Fever Consultation Center Perceived by the Officers Who Provided It in Kobe City, during Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Outbreak? A Qualitative Study Utilizing SCQRM. Kobe Journal of Medical Sciences, 56, 195-203.
[19]	Henrich, R.E., Baett, L., Botsco, M.A., Deibei, D., Feig, S. and Gray, J. (1999) Mammography Quality Control Manual: Patient Positioning and Compression. American College of Radiology, Reston, 30-75.
[20]	National Diet Library. List of Online Services. http://www.ndl.go.jp/en/service/online_service.html