Analysis of Different Call Admission Control Strategies and Its Impact on the Performance of LTE-Advanced Networks

Mahammad A. Safwat; Hesham M. El-Badawy; Ahmad Yehya; Hosni El-Motaafy

doi:10.4236/cn.2014.62016

Home > Journals > Computer Science & Communications > CN

Communications and Network > Vol.6 No.2, May 2014

Analysis of Different Call Admission Control Strategies and Its Impact on the Performance of LTE-Advanced Networks ()

Mahammad A. Safwat, Hesham M. El-Badawy, Ahmad Yehya, Hosni El-Motaafy

Department of Electrical Engineering, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Department of Electronics and Computer Engineering, HIT, Tenth of Ramdan City, Egypt.
Network Planning Department, National Telecommunication Institute, Cairo, Egypt.

DOI: 10.4236/cn.2014.62016 PDF HTML XML 4,144 Downloads 5,881 Views Citations

Abstract

The call admission control (CAC) optimizes the use of allocated channels against offered traffic maintaining the required quality of service (QoS). Provisioning QoS to user at cell-edge is a challenge where there is limitation in cell resources due to inter-cell interference (ICI). Soft Frequency Reuse is ICI mitigation scheme that controls the distribution of resources between users. In this paper, the Impact of four CAC schemes (Cutoff Priority scheme (CP), Uniform Fractional Guard Channel (UFGC), Limited Fractional Guard Channel (LFGC), New Call Bounding (NCB) scheme) at cell-edge have investigated using queuing analysis in a comparative manner. The comparison is based on two criteria. The first criterion guarantees a particular level of service to already admitted users while trying to optimize the revenue obtained. The second criterion determines the minimum of number of radio resources that provides hard constraints in both of blocking and dropping probabilities. The four schemes are compared at different scenarios of new and handover call arrival rates.

Keywords

Call Admission Control, Soft Frequency Reuse, QoS

Share and Cite:

Safwat, M. , El-Badawy, H. , Yehya, A. and El-Motaafy, H. (2014) Analysis of Different Call Admission Control Strategies and Its Impact on the Performance of LTE-Advanced Networks. Communications and Network, 6, 137-154. doi: 10.4236/cn.2014.62016.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Huang, G.-S., et al. (2010) A Novel Dynamic Call Admission Control Policy for Wireless Network. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 17, 110-116.
[2]	Qian, M.L., et al. (2012) Inter-Cell Interference Coordination through Adaptive Soft Frequency Reuse in LTE Networks. Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2012 IEEE.
[3]	R1-050507: Soft Frequency Reuse Scheme for UTRAN LTE. Huawei 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting no.41 Athens, Greece, May 2005.
[4]	Hong, D. and Rappaport, S. (1986) Traffic Model and Performance Analysis for Cellular Mobile Radio Telephone Systems with Prioritized and Nonprioritized Handoff Procedures. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 35, 77-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/T-VT.1986.24076
[5]	Ramjee, R., Nagarajan, R. and Towsley, D. (1996) On Optimal Call Admission Control in Cellular Networks. Proc. 15th Annual Joint Conf. IEEE Comp. and Commun. Societies (INFOCOM ’96), 1, 43-50.
[6]	Vazquez-Avila, J., Cruz-Perez, F.A.C. and Orti-goza-Guerrero, L. (2006) Performance Analysis of Fractional Guard Channel Policies in Mobile Cellular Networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 5, 301-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2006.1611053
[7]	Goswami, V. and Swain. P.K. (2012) Analysis of Finite Population Limited Fractional Guard Channel Call Admission Scheme in Cellular Networks) Procedia Engineering, 30, 759-766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.925
[8]	Kim, C., Klimenok, V.I. and Dudin. A.N. (2014) Analysis and Optimization of Guard Channel Policy in Cellular Mobile Networks with Account of Retrials. Computers & Operations Research, 43, 181-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2013.09.005
[9]	Chau, T.-C., Michael Wong, K.Y. and Bo, L. (2006) Optimal Call Admission Control with QoS Guarantee in a Voice/Data Integrated Cellular Network. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 5, 1133-1141.
[10]	Fang, Y. (2003) Thinning Schemes for Call Admission Control in Wireless Networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 52, 685-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TC.2003.1197135
[11]	Fang, Y. and Yi, Z. (2002) Call Admission Control Schemes and Performance Analysis in Wireless Mobile Networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 51, 371-82.
[12]	Firouzi, Z. and Hamid, B. (2009) A New Call Admission Control Scheme Based on New Call Bounding and Thinning II Schemes in Cellular Mobile Networks. IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology, 2009. eit'09.
[13]	Schneps-Schneppe, M. and Iversen, V.B. (2012) Call Admission Control in Cellular Networks. Mobile Networks, InTech, Zagreb, 111-136.
[14]	Li, S., Wen, X.M., Liu, Z.J., Zheng, W. and Sun. Y. (2010) Queue Anlysis of Soft Frequency Reuse Scheme in LTE-Advanced. Second International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation, 2010. ICCMS'10, 1, 248-252.
[15]	Safwat, M.A., El-Badawy, H.M., Yehya, A. and El-Motaafy, H. (2013) Performance Assessment for LTE-Advanced Networks with Uniform Fractional Guard Channel over Soft Frequency Reuse Scheme. Wireless Engineering and Technology, 4, 161. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/wet.2013.44024
[16]	Kolate, V.S., Patil, G.I. and Bhide. A.S. (2012) Call Admission Control Schemes and Handoff Prioritization in 3G Wireless Mobile Networks. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT), 1, 92-97.