|
[1]
|
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. New York: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804489
|
|
|
[2]
|
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Fineqan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.
|
|
|
[3]
|
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Stone, C. J., & Olshen, R. A. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont, CA: Chapman and Hall.
|
|
|
[4]
|
Dixon, R. M. W. (2005). A Semantic Approach to English Grammar (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
|
|
[5]
|
Eddington, D. (2010). A Comparison of Two Tools for Analyzing Linguistic Data: Logistic Regression and Decision Trees. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22, 265-286.
|
|
|
[6]
|
Egan, T. (2008). Non-Finite Complementation: A Usage-Based Study of Infinitive and -ing Clauses in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
|
|
|
[7]
|
Freed, A. F. (1979). The Semantics of English Aspectual Complementation. Dordrecht: Springer.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9475-1
|
|
|
[8]
|
Gawlik, O. (2012). On the Complementation of Start, Begin and Continue in Spoken Academic American English. Token: A Journal of English Linguistics, 1, 159-170.
|
|
|
[9]
|
Gries, S. T., & Hilpert, M. (2010). Modeling Diachronic Change in the Third Person Singular: A Multifactorial, Verband Author-Specific Exploratory Approach. English Language and Linguistics, 14, 293-320.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000092
|
|
|
[10]
|
Inkpen, D. (2007). A Statistical Model for Near-Synonym Choice. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing, 4, 2.1-2.17.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1187415.1187417
|
|
|
[11]
|
Johansson, S. (1978). Manual of Information to Accompany the Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus of British English, for Use with Digital Computers. Oslo: Department of English, University of Oslo.
|
|
|
[12]
|
Johnson, D. E. (2009). Getting off the Goldvarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed-Effects Variable Rule Analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 359-383.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x
|
|
|
[13]
|
Kilgarriff, A., & Tugwell, D. (2001). WORD SKETCH: Extraction and Display of Significant Collocations for Lexicography. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on COLLOCATION: Computational Extraction, Analysis and Exploitation (pp. 32-38). Toulouse: Association for Computational Linguistics.
|
|
|
[14]
|
Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, Deletion, and the Inherent Variability of the English Copula. Language, 45, 715-762.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/412333
|
|
|
[15]
|
Leitner, G. (1994). Begin and Start in British, American and India English. Hermes, Journal of Linguistics, 13, 99-122.
|
|
|
[16]
|
Leitner, G. (1993). Where to Begin or Start? Aspectual Verbs in Dictionaries. In M. Hoey (Eds.), Data, Description, Discourse: Papers on the English Language in Honour of John McH Sinclair on His Sixtieth Birthday (pp. 50-63). London: HarperCollins.
|
|
|
[17]
|
Lin, Y., Michel, J., Aiden, E. L., Orwant, J., Brockman, W., & Petrov, S. (2012). Syntactic Annotations for the Google Books Ngram Corpus. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (pp. 169-174). Jeju Island, Korea: Association for Computational Linguistics.
|
|
|
[18]
|
Mair, C. (2003). Gerundial Complements after Begin and Start: Grammatical and Sociolinguistic Factors, and How They Work against Each Other. In G. Rohdenburg &, B. Mondorf (Eds.), Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English (pp. 329-346). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
|
|
|
[19]
|
Mair, C. (2009). Infinitival and Gerundial Complements. In P. Peters, P. Collins, & A. Smith (Eds.), Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond (pp. 263-276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
|
|
|
[20]
|
Professional English Research Consortium (n.d.). PERC Corpus.
http://www.perc21.org/corpus_project/index.html
|
|
|
[21]
|
R Core Team (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
http://www.R-project.org/
|
|
|
[22]
|
Reiter, E., & Sripada, S. (2004). Contextual Influences on Near-Synonym Choice. Proceedings of the International Natural Language Generation Conference, Brockenhurst, 14-16 July 2004, 161-170.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27823-8_17
|
|
|
[23]
|
Rousseau, P., & Sankoff, D. (1978). Advances in Variable Rule Methodology. In D. Sankoff (Eds.), Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods (pp. 57-69). New York: Academic Press.
|
|
|
[24]
|
Saito Sigley, H. (1999). Dependence and Interaction in Frequency Data Analysis in SLA Research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 453-475.
|
|
|
[25]
|
Sigley, R. (2003). The Importance of Interaction Effects. Language Variation and Change, 15, 227-253.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954394503152040
|
|
|
[26]
|
Szmrecsanyi, B. (2006). Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English: A Corpus Study at the Intersection of Variationist Sociolinguistics, Psycholinguistics, and Discourse Analysis. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110197808
|
|
|
[27]
|
Therneau, T., Atkinson, B., & Ripley, B. (2013). Rpart: Recursive Partitioning. R Package Version 4.1-3.
http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rpart
|
|
|
[28]
|
Young, R., & Yandell, B. (1999). Top-Down versus Bottom up Analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 477488.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199003058
|
|