Social Comparisons on Self-Perception and Mate Preferences: The Self and the Others


This study aimed to investigate the effect of social comparison on self-perception and mate preferences. For this purpose, 225 undergraduate student participants provided their self-perception before and after evaluating descriptions of stimuli subjects specifically developed with high or low levels of physical, social and status related attributes. Participants also provided a description of their ideal short- and long-term partner. We hypothesized that self-evaluations and mate preferences change in response to exposure to competitors with different levels of reproductively relevant attributes. Results indicated that individuals were aware of the characteristics valued by the opposite-gender in the mating market and that self-evaluation was affected by the attributes of other people. No effect of social comparison on mate preferences was observed. These findings advance our understanding of the mate selection process by contributing more evidence that one’s own perceptions of mate value seem to be affected by the values of other individuals. Attention to the reproductively relevant attributes of others can help individuals optimize the time and energy invested in mate selection and determine the mating tactic most appropriate to a specific social environment.

Share and Cite:

Castro, F. , Hattori, W. , Yamamoto, M. & Lopes, F. (2014). Social Comparisons on Self-Perception and Mate Preferences: The Self and the Others. Psychology, 5, 688-699. doi: 10.4236/psych.2014.57080.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Bardel, M., Fontayne, P., Colombel, F., & Schiphof, L. (2010). Effects of Match Result and Social Comparison on Sport State Self-Esteem Fluctuations. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 171-176.
[2] Bereczkei, T., Voros, S., Gal, A., & Bernath, L. (1997). Resources, Attractiveness, Family Commitment; Reproductive Decisions in Human Mate Choice. Ethology, 103, 681-699.
[3] Blond, A. (2008). Impacts of Exposure to Images of Ideal Bodies on Male Body Dissatisfaction: A Review. Body Image, 5, 244-250.
[4] Brase, G. L., & Guy, E. C. (2004). The Demographics of Mate Value and Self-Esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 471-484.
[5] Bredow, C. A., Huston, T. L., & Glenn, N. D. (2011). Market Value, Quality of the Pool of Potential Mates, and Singles’ Confidence about Marrying. Personal Relationships, 18, 39-57.
[6] Brown, S. L. (2000). Union Transitions among Cohabitors: The Significance of Relationship Assessments and Expectations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 833-846.
[7] Buss, D. M. (1985). Human Mate Selection: Opposites Are Sometimes Said to Attract, But in Fact We Are Likely to Marry Someone Who Is Similar to Us in Almost Every Variable. American Scientist, 73, 47-51.
[8] Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
[9] Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in Human Mate Selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.
[10] Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
[11] Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A Half Century of Mate Preferences: The Cultural Evolution of Values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 491-503.
[12] Buston, P. M., & Emlen, S. T. (2003). Cognitive Processes Underlying Human Mate Choice: The Relationship between Self-Perception and Mate Preference in Western Society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 8805-8810.
[13] Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and Gender Differences in Mate Selection Criteria for Various Involvement Levels. Personal Relationship, 9, 271-278.
[14] Castro, F. N., & Lopes. F. A. (2011). Romantic Preferences in Brazilian Undergraduate Students: From the Short Term to the Long Term. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 479-485.
[15] Castro, F. N., Hattori, W. T., & Lopes. F. A. (2012). Relationship Maintenance or Preference Satisfaction? Male and Female Strategies in Romantic Partner Choice. Journal of Social, Evolutionary & Cultural Psychology, 6, 217-226.
[16] Feingold, A. (1992). Good-Looking People Are Not What We Think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304-341.
[17] Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
[18] Fisher, M., Cox, A., Bennett, S., & Gavric, D. (2008). Components of Self-Perceived Mate Value. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2, 156-168.
[19] Gallant, S., Williams, L., Fisher, M., & Cox, A. (2011). Mating Strategies and Self-Presentation in Online Personal Advertisement Photographs. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 5, 106-121.
[20] Gilbert, P., Price, J., & Allan, S. (1995). Social Comparison, Social Attractiveness and Evolution: How Might They Be Related? New Ideas in Psychology, 13, 149-165.
[21] Groesz, L. M., Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2002). The Effect of Experimental Presentation of Thin Media Images on Body Satisfaction: A Meta-Analytic Review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 1-16.
[22] Grogan, S., Williams, Z., & Conner, M. (1996). The Effects of Viewing Same-Gender Photographic Models on Body-Esteem. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 569-575.
[23] Gutierres, S. E., Kenrick, D. T., & Partch, J. J. (1999). Beauty, Dominance, and the Mating Game: Contrast Effects in Self-Assessment Reflect Gender Differences in Mate Selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1126-1134.
[24] Hamermesh, D. S., & Biddle, J. E. (1994). Beauty and the Labor Market. American Economic Association, 84, 1174-1194.
[25] Harrison, K., Taylor, L. D., & Marske, A. L. (2006). Women’s and Men’s Eating Behavior Following Exposure to Ideal-Body Images and Text. Communication Research, 33, 507-529.
[26] Hill, R. (1945). Campus Values in Mate Selection. Journal of Home Economics, 37, 554-558.
[27] Hosoda, M., Stone-Romero, E. F., & Coats, G. (2003). The Effects of Physical Attractiveness on Jog-Related Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies. Personnel Psychology, 56, 431-462.
[28] Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica (IBGE) (2010a). Censo demografico 2010: Resultados do universo—caracteristicas da populacao e dos domicilios (Tabela 3175).
[29] Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica (IBGE) (2010b). Sintese de indicadores sociais: Uma analise das condicoes de vida da populacao brasileira, estudos & pesquisas: Informacao demografica e socioeconomica [Synthesis of Social Indicators: An Analysis of the Living Conditions of the Brazilian Population, Studies & Surveys: Demographic and Socioeconomic Information] (número 27). Rio de Janeiro: Author.
[30] Kemmelmeier, M., & Oyserman, D. (2001). The Ups and Downs of Thinking about a Successful Other: Self-Construals and the Consequences of Social Comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 311-320.
[31] Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost, M. R. (1990). Evolution, Traits, and the Stages of Human Courtship: Qualifying the Parental Investment Model. Journal of Personality, 58, 97-116.
[32] Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S., & Apple, K. J. (2003). Pluralistic Ignorance and Hooking Up. The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 129-133.
[33] Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The Necessities and Luxuries of Mate Preferences: Testing the Tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947-955.
[34] Lippa, R. A. (2007). The Preferred Traits of Mates in a Cross-National Study of Heterosexual and Homosexual Men and Women: An Examination of Biological and Cultural Influences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 193-208.
[35] Little, A. C., & Mannion, H. (2006). Viewing Attractive or Unattractive Same-Sex Individuals Changes Self-Rated Attractiveness and Face Preferences in Women. Animal Behaviour, 72, 981-987.
[36] Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Self-Perceived Attractiveness Influences Human Female Preferences for Sexual Dimorphism and Symmetry in Male Faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 39-44.
[37] McGinnis, R. (1958). Campus Values in Mate Selection: A Repeat Study. Social Forces, 36, 368-373.
[38] Mills, J. S., Polivy, J., Herman, C. P., & Tiggemann, M. (2002). Effects of Exposure to Thin Media Images: Evidence of Self-Enhancement among Restrained Eaters. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1687-1699.
[39] Mulford, M., Orbell, J., Shatto, C., & Stockard, J. (1998). Physical Attractiveness, Opportunity, and Success in Everyday Exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1565-1592.
[40] Owen, J. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. (2010). “Hooking Up” among College Students: Demographic and Psychosocial Correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 653-663.
[41] Owen, J., Fincham, F. D., & Moore, J. (2011). Short-Term Prospective Study of Hooking Up among College Students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 331-341.
[42] Sprecher, S., Sullivan, Q., & Hatfield, E. (1994). Mate Selection Preferences: Gender Differences Examined in a National Sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1074-1080.
[43] Stapel, D. A., & Blanton, H. (2004). From Seeing to Being: Subliminal Social Comparison Affect Implicit and Explicit Self-Evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 468-481.
[44] Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social Comparison: Why, with Whom and with What Effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 159-163.
[45] Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social Comparison Activity under Threat: Downward Evaluation and Upward Contacts. Psychological Review, 96, 569-575.
[46] Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental Investment and Sexual Selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971 (pp. 136-179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
[47] Vukovic, J., Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Welling, L. L. M., Little, A. C., & Smith, F. G. (2008). Self-Rated Attractiveness Predicts Individual Differences in Women’s Preferences for Masculine Men’s Voices. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 451-456.
[48] Wade, T. J. (2000). Evolutionary Theory and Self-Perception: Sex Differences in Body Esteem Predictors of Self-Perceived Physical and Sexual Attractiveness and Self-Esteem. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 36-45.
[49] Wade, T. J. (2003). Evolutionary Theory and African American Self-Perception: Sex Differences in Body-Esteem Predictors of Self-Perceived Physical and Sexual Attractiveness, and Self-Esteem. Journal of Black Psychology, 29, 123-141.
[50] Wade, T. J., & McCrea, S. (1999). Intrasexual Competition and Contrast Effects on Men’s Self-Ratings of Attractiveness and Social Ascendancy. Psychology, Evolution & Gender, 1, 229-243.
[51] Waller, M. R., & McLanahan, S. S. (2005). “His” and “Her” Marriage Expectations: Determinants and Consequences. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 53-67.
[52] Weeden, J., & Sabini, J. (2005). Physical Attractiveness and Health in Western Societies: A Review. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 635-653.
[53] Weeden, J., & Sabini, J. (2007). Subjective and Objective Measures of Attractiveness and Their Relation to Sexual Behavior and Sexual Attitudes in University Students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 79-88.
[54] Wilcox, K., & Laird, J. D. (2000). The Impact of Media Images of Super-Slender Women on Women’s Self-Esteem: Identification, Social Comparison, and Self-Perception. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 278-286.
[55] Woodward, K., & Richards, M. H. (2005). The Parental Investment Model and Minimum Mate Choice Criteria in Humans. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 57-61.

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.