Network Misconduct of College Students and Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy

Huiying Liu; Bian Du

doi:10.4236/jss.2014.25023

Home > Journals > Business & Economics | Social Sciences & Humanities > JSS

Open Journal of Social Sciences > Vol.2 No.5, May 2014

Network Misconduct of College Students and Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy ()

Huiying Liu, Bian Du

Educational Department of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2014.25023 PDF HTML 4,488 Downloads 5,302 Views

Abstract

Purposes: Analyze characteristics of network misconduct of college students and study its correlation with regulatory emotional self-efficacy through scale survey of network misconduct of college students. Methods: Conduct the test on 1321 college students by using the scale of network misconduct and regulatory emotional self-efficacy of college students. SPSS was used to compile effective data. Statistical analysis was made using descriptive statistics, independent sample t test and one-way analysis of variance. Results: 1) M ± SD for network words anomie, study anomie and infringement are: 8.76 ± 2.07; 7.40 ± 2.17; 5.21 ± 2.16. 2) There are significant differences of network misconduct of college students on genders, education levels, majors and grades. (t = 12.510, p < 0.001; t = 50.957, P < 0.001; t = 23.840, p < 0.001; t = 28.576, P < 0.001). 3) Conclusions of significantly negative correlation between regulatory emotional self-efficacy and network misconduct (r = -0.134, p < 0.01). For college student, network misconduct includes network words anomie, study anomie and infringement behavior, among which, network words anomie is more prominent; and self-efficacy concerning college students’ emotion regulation has significantly negative correlation with network misconduct.

Keywords

College Students, Network Misconduct, Emotional Self-Efficacy

Share and Cite:

Liu, H. and Du, B. (2014) Network Misconduct of College Students and Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 114-119. doi: 10.4236/jss.2014.25023.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Zhang, D.M. (2011) Study on Network Misconduct of College Students. Ocean University of China, Qing-dao.
[2]	Zheng, P.G. and Li, X.D. (2008) Investigation and Analysis on Network Misconduct of College Students. Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education, 176, 126-129.
[3]	Li, Y. (2007) Morphologic Expression, Social Harm and Management Measures of Network Misconduct. Inner Mongolia Social Sciences, 28, 121-125.
[4]	Lian, L. (2007) Study on Network Misconduct. Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou.
[5]	Zhou, L.F. (2012) Study on Network Misconduct of College Students Who Were Born after 1990—Taking Putian University as an Example. Fujian Normal University, Fujian.
[6]	Yu, H.L. (2011) Preparation and Application of Questionnaire of Network Misconduct of College Students. Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing.
[7]	Hu, Z.H. (2009) Study on Implicit Aggressivity and Implicit Self-Esteem of People with Network Misconduct. Journal of Psychological Science, 32, 210-212.
[8]	Zhang, W.M. (2006) Network Misconduct of College Students and Ideological and Political Education. Journal of Anyang Normal University, 4, 20-21.
[9]	Zhang, J.S. (2012) Construction of Prevention Model for Network Misconduct of College Students-Based on the Theory of Constraints. Theory and Practice of Education, 32, 29-31.
[10]	Mitchell, P. (2000) Internet Addiction: Genuire Diagnosis or Not. The Lancet, 355, 632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)72500-9
[11]	Zhang, P., Zhang, M. and Lu, J.M. (2010) Trial Analysis on Application of Emotional Self-Efficacy Scale to Chinese College Students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18, 568-570.