Estimation of Timber Production of Five Species of the Tamaulipas Thorny Shrubs Growing in Native Stands and Plantations

Ngangyo Heya Maginot, Foroughbakhch Pournavab Rahim, Carrillo-Parra Artemio, Salas Cruz Lidia-Rosaura

Department of Botany, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University Autonomous of Nuevo León, University Town, San Nicolás de los Garza, Mexico.
Laboratory of Wood Tecnology, Faculty of Forestry Sciences, University Autonomous of Nuevo León, Linares, Mexico.

DOI: 10.4236/ojf.2014.43031                

Abstract

Shrub species have a great capacity to develop in extreme climatic conditions; this ability has a direct influence on their development and productivity in timber and firewood. In this paper, the timber’s production of experimental plantation aged 28 years of Acacia berlandieri (Benth.), Havardia pallens (Benth.) Britton & Rose, Helietta parvifolia (Gray) Benth., Ebenopsis ebano (Berl.) Barneby and Acacia wrightii (Benth.) species is quantified and compared with the production of the same species developed naturally in the native bush. The variables recorded were the number of shoots per tree, total height, basal diameter and diameter at breast height of each tree to determine the volume of wood with the Smalian equation. The results indicate that the volume of usable wood was higher in experimental plantation than that on native vegetation for H. parvifolia, A. berlandieri and H. pallens. The species that produced the highest volume of timber were H. parvifolia (0.396 m³·ha^-1·year^-1) in plantations and E. ebano (0.118 m³·ha^-1·year^-1) in native shrubs, species with lower production were H. pallens (0.059 m³·ha^-1·year^-1) and A. berlandieri (0.052 m³·ha^-1·year^-1) in the native area. The highest number of shoots was registered for A. berlandieri and H. parvifolia, with eight shoots per tree in experimental plantations of both species compared with native vegetation, which was five and three shoots per tree respectively. These results high-light the importance of developing plantations in degraded areas of scrub, which can increase timber volume production.

Keywords

Timber, Shoots, Tamaulipas Thorny Scrub, Plantation, Native Vegetation

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Alanís, R. E. (2006). Diversidad de especies arbóreas y arbustivas en áreas con distinto historial antropogénico en el matorral espinoso tamaulipeco. Tesis de maestría. UANL.
[2]	Andrade, C. M. S., Garcia, R., Couto, L., & Pereira, O. G. (2001). Fatores limitantes ao crescimento do capim-Tanzania em um sistema agrossilvipastoril com eucalipto, na regiao dos Cerrados de Minas Gerais. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 30, 78-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982001000500007
[3]	Booth, T. H. (1985). A New Method for Assisting Species Selection. Commonwealth Forestry Review, 64, 241-250.
[4]	Burley, J., & Von Carlowitz, P. (1984). Multipurpose Tree Germoplasm. Nairobi: ICRAF.
[5]	Carrillo, P. A. (1991). Efecto de algunos tratamientos silvícolas y de factores abióticos sobre la regeneración y manejo del matorral. Tesis, ingeniería forestal, Linares: Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, UANL.
[6]	Cavazos, M. T., & Molina, V. (1992). Registros climatológicos de la región citrícola de NuevoLeón. Boletín Técnico, 1, 1-65.
[7]	De Soyza, A. G., Whitford, W. G., Martinez, M. E., & Van Zee, J. W. (1997). Variation in Creosote Bush (Larrea tridentate) Canopy Morphology in Relation to Habitat, Soil Fertility and Associated Annual Plant Communities. American Midland Naturalist Journal, 137, 13-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2426751
[8]	Estévez, I. (2004). Estudio dendroecológico y estructural de Erica australis L. Trabajo de Investigación Tutelado. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
[9]	FAO-UNESCO (1974). Soil Map of the World (Vol. I). Paris: UNESCO.
[10]	Foroughbakhch, R., & Heiseke, D. (1990). El matorral como recurso forestal. Reporte Científico No. 1 (1985)—Reimpresión 1990. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, UANL, 31 p.
[11]	García, E. (2004). Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Koppen para adaptarlo a las condiciones de la República Mexicana (3r ed., 252 p). México D.F.: UNAM.
[12]	Guevara-Escobar, A., Kemp, P. D., Mackay, A. D., & Hodgson, J. (2007). Pasture Production and Composition under Poplar in a Hill Environment in New Zealand. Agroforestry, 69, 199-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-007-9038-9
[13]	Hinkelmann, K., & Kempthorne, O. (1994). Design and Analysis of Experiments. Introduction to Experimental Design (Vol. 1). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[14]	Hormazabal, F. (1986). Especies forestales exóticas de interés económico para Chile (Vol. 32). Santiago: Instituto Forestal, 61-111.
[15]	Manzano, M.G. (1997). Procesos de desertificación asociados a sobre pastoreo por caprinos en el matorral espinoso de Linares, Nuevo León. Master’s Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Mexico: UANL.
[16]	Martínez, R., Azpiroz, R., Rodríguez de la, O., Cetina, A., & Gutiérrez, E. (2006). Importancia de las Plantaciones Forestales de Eucalyptus. Ra Ximhai Revista de Sociedad, Cultura y Desarrollo Sustentable. Universidad Autónoma Indígena de México.
[17]	Moctezuma, L. G. (2007). Primer ciclo de seminarios de investigación del CENID-COMEF. México DF: En Memorias de Seminario INIFAP-CENID, 38 p.
[18]	Navar, J., & Bryan, R. B. (1994). Fitting the Analytical Model of Rainfall Interception of Gash to Individual Shrubs of Semi-Arid Vegetation in Northeastern Mexico. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 68, 133-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(94)90032-9
[19]	Navar, J., Charles, F., & Jurado, E. (1999). Spatial Variations of Interception Loss Components by Tamaulipan Thornscrub in Northeastern Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management, 124, 231-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00077-8
[20]	Navar, C. J. (2003). Información directa de Control Hidrológico de la Región. Linares, NL: Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, UANL.
[21]	Niembro-Rocas, A. (1990). árboles y arbustos útiles de México. Mexico, DF: Limusa, 206.
[22]	Ruiz, J. L. (2005). Caracterización estructural del Matorral Espinoso Tamaulipeco, Linares N.L. Tesis de Maestría. FCF_ UANL.
[23]	Rzedowski, J. (1978). Vegetación de México. México, DF: Limusa.
[24]	Tewari, J. C., Harris, P. J. C., Harsh, L. N., Cadoret, K., & Pasiecznik, N. M. (2000). Managing Prosopis juliflora (Vilayati babul). A Technical Manual. Jodhpur: Central Arid Zone Research Institute and Coventry: HDRA.
[25]	Vale, R. S., Couto, L., Silva, M. L., Garcia, R., Almeida, J. C. C., & Lani, J. L. (2004). Ana′lise da viabilidade economica de um sistema silvipastoril com eucalipto para a Zona da Mata de Minas Gerais. Agrossilvicultura, 1, 107-120.
[26]	Velazco-Macías, C. G., Alanis-Flores, G., Alvarado-Vázquez, M., Ramírez-Freire, L., & Foroughbakhch-Pournavab, R. (2011). Endemic Flora from Nuevo León, Mexico and Adjacent States. Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, 5, 275-298.
[27]	Woerner, M. (1991). Los suelos bajo vegetación del matorral del noreste de México, descritos a través de ejemplos en el Campus Universitario de la UANL. Reporte Científico No. 22 Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, UANL, 116 p.
[28]	Zar, J. H. (2010). Biostatistical Analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 947.