Comparative Study of Different Methods for Analyzing Denitrifying Bacteria in Fresh Water Ecosystems

Kristina Rathsack, Jörg Böllmann, Marion Martienssen

Department of Biotechnology for Water Treatment, BTU-Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany.

DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2014.66059                

Abstract

Bacteria capable of denitrification play a significant role in the nitrogen cycle of freshwater ecosystems. By metabolizing nitrogen compounds they e.g. counteract the eutrophication of natural waters. To get detailed insights into the in situ turnover rates of nitrogen a reliable tool of quantification for active microorganisms is essential. In the present investigation, quantification capabilities of a molecular tool (Polymerase Chain Reaction—PCR) and a cultivation based tool (Most probable number—MPN) were investigated and compared. The total bacterial concentration yielded by the molecular PCR approach was up to 6-fold higher compared to the results of the MPN approach. However, the portion of culturable denitrifying bacteria compared to the number of specific gene copies (nirS) was much lower. Depending on the environmental conditions, the difference between the PCR and the MPN approach was up to three orders of magnitude. From lab scale experiments with a pure P. aeroginosa strain it can be concludes, that these differences are not the result of inappropriate culture conditions but rather reflect the portion of so called viable but not culturable bacteria (VBNC). Low nitrate concentrations as found in many fresh water ecosystems induced a significant increase in the portion of non culturable denitrifying bacteria. Referred to the investigation of dynamic populations, the number of metabolic active bacteria is represented by the MPN rather than by the PCR approach.

Keywords

PCR, MPN, Quantification, Denitrification

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Gihring, T.M., Canion, A., Riggs, A., Huettel, M. and Kostka, J.E. (2010) Denitrification in Shallow, Sublittoral Gulf of Mexico Permeable Sediments. Limnology and Oceanography, 55, 43-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0043
[2]	Klocker, C.A., Kaushal, S.S., Groffman, P.M., Mayer, P.M. and Morgan, R.P. (2009) Nitrogen Uptake and Denitrification in Restored and Unrestored Streams in Urban Maryland, USA. Aquatic Sciences, 71, 411-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00027-009-0118-y
[3]	Wallenstein, M.D., Myrold, D.D., Firestone, M. and Voytek, M. (2006) Environmental Controls on Denitrifying Communities and Denitrification Rates: Insights from Molecular Methods. Ecological Applications, 16, 2143-2152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2143:ECODCA]2.0.CO;2
[4]	Zarnetske, J.P., Haggerty, R., Wondzell, S.M., Bokil, V.A. and González-Pinzón, R. (2012) Coupled Transport and Reaction Kinetics Control the Nitrate Source-Sink Function of Hyporheic Zones. Water Resources Research, 48.
[5]	Ryuda, N., Hashimoto, T., Ueno, D., Inoue, K. and Someya, T. (2010) Visualization and Direct Counting of Individual Denitrifying Bacterial Cells in Soil by nirK-Targeted Direct in Situ PCR. Microbes and Environments/JSME, 26, 74-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME10180
[6]	Smith, C.J., Nedwell, D.B., Dong, L.F. and Osborn, A.M. (2006) Evaluation of Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Approaches for Determining Gene Copy and Gene Transcript Numbers in Environmental Samples. Environmental Microbiology, 8, 804-815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00963.x
[7]	Feray, C., Volat, B., Degrange, V., Clays-Josserand, A. and Montuelle, B. (1999) Assessment of Three Methods for Detection and Quantification of Nitrite-Oxidizing Bacteria and Nitrobacter in Freshwater Sediments (MPN-PCR, MPN-Griess, Immunofluorescence). Microbial Ecology, 37, 208-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002489900144
[8]	Chen, G.-Y., Qiu, S.-L. and Zhou, Y.-Y. (2009) Diversity and Abundance of Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria in Eutrophic and Oligotrophic Basins of a Shallow Chinese Lake (Lake Donghu). Research in Microbiology, 160, 173-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2009.01.003
[9]	Kayashima, T., Suzuki, H., Maeda, T. and Ogawa, H.I. (2013) Real-Time PCR for Rapidly Detecting Aniline-Degrading Bacteria in Activated Sludge. Chemosphere, 91, 1338-1343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.114
[10]	Phillips, C.J., Paul, E.A. and Prosser, J.I. (2000) Quantitative Analysis of Ammonia Oxidising Bacteria Using Competitive PCR. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 32, 167-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00710.x
[11]	Fakruddin, M., Mannan, K.S.B. and Andrews, S. (2013) Viable but Nonculturable Bacteria: Food Safety and Public Health Perspective. ISRN Microbiology 2013.
[12]	Oliver, J.D. (2005) The Viable but Nonculturable State in Bacteria. Journal of Microbiology, 43, 93-100.
[13]	Tiedje, J.M. (1988) Ecology of Denitrification and Dissimilatory Nitrate Reduction to Ammonium. Biology of Anaerobic Microorganisms, 717, 179-244.
[14]	Hobbie, J.E., Daley, R.J. and Jasper, S. (1977) Use of Nuclepore Filters for Counting Bacteria by Fluorescence Microscopy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 33, 1225-1228.
[15]	Michels, J., Stuhrmann, M., Frey, C. and Koschitzky, H. (2008) Handlungsempfehlungen Mit Methodensammlung, Natürliche Schadstoffminderung bei der Sanierung von Altlasten. VEGAS, Institut für Wasserbau, Universitat Stuttgart, DECHEMA eV Frankfurt.
[16]	Cataldo, D., Maroon, M., Schrader, L. and Youngs, V. (1975) Rapid Colorimetric Determination of Nitrate in Plant Tissue by Nitration of Salicylic Acid 1. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis, 6, 71-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103627509366547
[17]	Bremner, J. (1965) Inorganic Forms of Nitrogen. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 1179-1237.
[18]	Bourrain, M., Achouak, W., Urbain, V. and Heulin, T. (1999) DNA Extraction from Activated Sludges. Current Microbiology, 38, 315-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/PL00006809
[19]	Throback, I.N., Enwall, K., Jarvis, A. and Hallin, S. (2004) Reassessing PCR Primers Targeting nirS, nirK and nosZ Genes for Community Surveys of Denitrifying Bacteria with DGGE. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 49, 401-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2004.04.011
[20]	Lindim, C., Becker, A. and Fischer, H. (2013) Impacts of N Reduction on the Ecological Condition of the Lower Havel Eigenverlag der DGL.
[21]	Scala, D.J. and Kerkhof, L.J. (1998) Nitrous Oxide Reductase (nosZ) Gene-Specific PCR Primers for Detection of Denitrifiers and Three nosZ Genes from Marine Sediments. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 162, 61-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb12979.x
[22]	Michotey, V., Méjean, V. and Bonin, P. (2000) Comparison of Methods for Quantification of Cytochrome cd 1-Denitrifying Bacteria in Environmental Marine Samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 1564-1571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.4.1564-1571.2000
[23]	Chèneby, D., Philippot, L., Hartmann, A., Hénault, C. and Germon, J. (2000) 16S rDNA Analysis for Characterization of Denitrifying Bacteria Isolated from Three Agricultural Soils. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 34, 121-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6496(00)00080-5
[24]	Henry, S., Baudoin, E., López-Gutiérrez, J.C., Martin-Laurent, F., Brauman, A. and Philippot, L. (2004) Quantification of Denitrifying Bacteria in Soils by< i> nirK Gene Targeted Real-Time PCR. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 59, 327-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2004.07.002