Share This Article:

Integrating Curriculum Design Theory into ESP Course Construction: Aviation English for Aircraft Engineering

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:599KB) PP. 219-227
DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2014.42017    6,697 Downloads   9,111 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

This paper considers the arguments for the construction of courses in ESP (English for Specific Purposes) focusing on the integration of curriculum design theory into an English course for aircraft engineering at the Civil Aviation University of China. For teacher-researchers interested in designing and implementing an aviation English instruction program, this paper offers an example framework of how this might be done and evaluates the framework within an action research model. A needs analysis is made and a curriculum presented for an integrated course in aviation English for aircraft engineers in the Chinese context, so that learners of ESP can learn the target language more effectively and put the learning to practical use.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Lin, J. , Wang, A. and Zhang, C. (2014) Integrating Curriculum Design Theory into ESP Course Construction: Aviation English for Aircraft Engineering. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 4, 219-227. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2014.42017.

References

[1] Diaz-Rico, L. (2008). Strategies for Teaching English Learners (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
[2] Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. (1998). Developments in ESP: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[3] Flowerdew, J., & Peacock, M. (Eds.) (2001). Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524766
[4] Greenberg, L. J. (2004). Language Acquisition.
http://earthrenewal.org/secondlang.htm
[5] Hamp-Lyons, L. (2001). English for Academic Purposes. In R. Cater, & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (pp. 126-130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206.019
[6] Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learner-Centered Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733031
[7] Jackson, J. (2005). An Inter-University, Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of Business Education: Perceptions of a Business Faculty in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 293-306.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.004
[8] Munby, J. (1978). Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[9] Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language Curriculum Design. New York & London: Routledge.
[10] Nunan, D. (1987). The Teacher as Curriculum Developer: An Investigation of Curriculum Processes within the Adult Migrant Education Program. Adelaide: (Australian) National Curriculum Resource Centre.
[11] Nunan, D. (1993). Experiential Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[12] Robinson, P. (1991). ESP Today. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice-Hall International (UK) Ltd.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.