Utilizing Dimensional Analysis with Observed Data to Determine the Significance of Hydrodynamic Solutions in Coastal Hydrology

Eric D. Swain, Jeremy D. Decker, Joseph D. Hughes

US Geological Survey, Florida Water Science Center, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
US Geological Survey, Florida Water Science Center, Tampa, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/cweee.2014.32008                

Abstract

In this paper, the authors present an analysis of the magnitude of the temporal and spatial acceleration (inertial) terms in the surface-water flow equations and determine the conditions under which these inertial terms have sufficient magnitude to be required in the computations. Data from two South Florida field sites are examined and the relative magnitudes of temporal acceleration, spatial acceleration, and the gravity and friction terms are compared. Parameters are derived by using dimensionless numbers and applied to quantify the significance of the hydrodynamic effects. The time series of the ratio of the inertial and gravity terms from field sites are presented and compared with both a simplified indicator parameter and a more complex parameter called the Hydrodynamic Significance Number (HSN). Two test-case models were developed by using the SWIFT2D hydrodynamic simulator to examine flow behavior with and without the inertial terms and compute the HSN. The first model represented one of the previously-mentioned field sites during gate operations of a structure-managed coastal canal. The second model was a synthetic test case illustrating the drainage of water down a sloped surface from an initial stage while under constant flow. The analyses indicate that the times of substantial hydrodynamic effects are sporadic but significant. The simplified indicator parameter correlates much better with the hydrodynamic effect magnitude for a constant width channel such as Miami Canal than at the non-uniform North River. Higher HSN values indicate flow situations where the inertial terms are large and need to be taken into account.

Keywords

Hydrodynamic, Dimensional Analysis, Coastal, Numerical Modeling

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Fread, D.L. and Hsu, K.S. (1993) Applicability of Two Simplified Flood Routing Methods: Level-Pool and Muskingum-Cunge. ASCE National Hydraulic Engineering Conference, San Francisco, 26-30 July 1993, 1564-1568.
[2]	Kundzewicz, Z. (1983) Hydrodynamic Determination of Parameters of Linear Flood Routing Models: Scientific Procedures Applied to the Planning, Design, and Management of Water Resources Systems. Proceedings of the Hamburg Symposium, Hamburg, 3-7 August 1983, 149-160.
[3]	Lee, J.K. (1989) The One-Dimensional Equations of Unsteady Open-Channel Flow. Proceedings of the Advanced Seminar on One-Dimensional Open-Channel Flow and Transport Modeling, National Space Technology Laboratory, Bay St. Louis, 15-18 June 1987, US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 89-4061, 6-10.
[4]	French, R.H. (1985) Open-Channel Flow. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 551.
[5]	Bedient, P.B. and Huber, W.C. (1988) Hydrology and Flood-Plain Analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York, 262.
[6]	Ponce, V.M. (1990) Generalized Diffusion Wave Equation with Inertial Effects. Water Resources Research, 26, 1099-1101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/WR026i005p01099
[7]	Richardson, J.R. and Julien, P.Y. (1994) Suitability of Simplified Overland Flow Equations. Water Resources Research, 30, 665-671.
[8]	Moramarco, T., Pandolfo, C. and Singh, V. (2008) Accuracy of Kinematic Wave and Diffusion Wave Approximations for Flood Routing. I: Steady Analysis. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 13, 1078-1088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:11(1078)
[9]	Schaffranek, R.W., Baltzer, R.A. and Goldberg, D.E. (1981) A Model for Simulation of Flow in Singular and Interconnected Channels. US Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 7, Chapter 3, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 110 p.
[10]	Hydrologic Engineering Center (1996) UNET: One Dimensional Unsteady Flow through a Full Network of Open Channels—User’s Manual, Version 3.1. Computer Program Document CPD-66, US Army Corps of Engineers, Davis.
[11]	USACE (2000) Users Guide to RMA2 WES Version 4.5. US Army, Engineer Research and Development Center, Waterways Experiment Station, Coastal Hydraulics Laboratory.
[12]	Schaffranek, R.W. (2004) Simulation of Surface-Water Integrated Flow and Transport in Two Dimensions: SWIFT2D User’s Manual. US Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 6, Chapter 1, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 115 p.
[13]	Hamrick, J.M. (1992) A Three-Dimensional Environmental Fluid Dynamics Computer Code: Theoretical and Computational Aspects. The College of William and Mary, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Special Report 317, 63 p.
[14]	Luettich Jr., R.A., Westerink, J.J. and Scheffner, N.W. (1992) ADCIRC: An Advanced Three-Dimensional Circulation Model for Shelves Coasts and Estuaries, Report 1: Theory and Methodology of ADCIRC-2DDI and ADCIRC-3DL. Dredging Research Program Technical Report DRP-92-6, US Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, 137 p.
[15]	Jobson, H.E. (1989) User’s Manual for an Open-Channel Streamflow Model Based on the Diffusion Analogy. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 89-4133, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 73 p.
[16]	Bales, J.D., Fulford, J.M. and Swain, E.D. (1997) Review of Selected Features of the Natural System Model, and Suggestions for Applications in South Florida. US Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigation Report 97-4039, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 42 p.
[17]	Jobson, H.E. and Harbaugh, A.W. (1999) Modifications to the Diffusion Analogy Surface-Water Flow Model (Daflow) for Coupling to the Modular Finite-Difference Ground-Water Flow Model (Modflow). US Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-217, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 107 p.
[18]	Langevin, C.D., Swain, E.D. and Wolfert, M.A. (2005) Simulation of Integrated Surface-Water/Ground-Water Flow and Salinity for a Coastal Wetland and Adjacent Estuary. Journal of Hydrology, 314, 212-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.015
[19]	Swain, E.D. and Wexler, E.J. (1992) A Coupled Surface-Water and Ground-Water Flow Model for Simulation of Stream-Aquifer Interaction. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 92-138, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 162 p.
[20]	Walton, R., Wexler, E.J., Chapman, R.S. and Welter, D. (2000) MODNET: An Integrated Groundwater/Open-Channel Flow Model. Proceedings of the 2000 Joint Conference on Water Resources Engineering and Water Resources Planning and Management, Minneapolis, 30 July-2 August 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784405178
[21]	Langevin, C.D., Thorne Jr., D.T., Dausman, A.M., Sukop, M.C. and Guo, W. (2007) SEAWAT Version 4: A Computer Program for Simulation of Multi-Species Solute and Heat Transport. US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 6, Chapter A22, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 39 p.
[22]	Swain, E.D. and Decker, J.D. (2009) Development, Testing, and Application of a Coupled Hydrodynamic Surface-Water/Ground-Water Model (FTLOADDS) with Heat and Salinity Transport in the Ten-Thousand Islands/Picayune Strand Restoration Project Area, Florida. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5146 US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 42 p.
[23]	Swain, E.D., Lohmann, M.A. and Decker, J.D. (2008) Hydrologic Simulations of Water-Management Scenarios in Support of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. In: The Role of Hydrology in Water Resources Management: IAHS Red Book Series, UNESCO/IAHS Symposium, Isle of Capri, Napoli, 14-16 October 2008, 296-305.
[24]	Wang, J.D., Swain, E.D., Wolfert, M.A., Langevin, C.D., James, D.E. and Telis, P.A. (2007) Applications of Flow and Transport in a Linked Overland/Aquifer Density Dependent System (FTLOADDS) to Simulate Flow, Salinity, and Surface-Water Stage in the Southern Everglades, Florida. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5010, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 112 p.
[25]	Hughes, J.D., Langevin, C.D., Chartier, K.L. and White, J.T. (2012) Documentation of the Surface-Water Routing (SWR1) Process for Modeling Surface-Water Flow with the U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model (MODFLOW-2005). US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 6, Chapter A40 (Version 1.0), US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 113 p.
[26]	Chin, D.A. (2000) Water-Resources Engineering. Prentice-Hall Inc., New York, 750 p.