Calibration and Evaluation of Link Congestion Functions: Applying Intrinsic Sensitivity of Link Speed as a Practical Consideration to Heterogeneous Facility Types within Urban Network

Enock T. Mtoi, Ren Moses

Civil and Environmental Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/jtts.2014.42014                

Abstract

This paper explores the use of archived data to calibrate volume delay functions (VDFs) and updates their input parameters (capacity and free-flow speed) for planning applications. The sensitivity analysis of speed to change in congestion level is performed to capture functional characteristics of VDFs in modeling specific facility types. Different sensitivity characteristics shown by the VDFs indicate that each function is suitable to a particular facility type. The results of sensitivity analysis are confirmed by the root mean square percent error (RMSPE) values calculated using the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study (OUATS) model results and observed data. The modified Davidson’s function exhibits remarkable performance in nearly all facility types. The strength of the modified Davidson’s function across a broad range of facilities can be attributed to the flexibility of its tuning parameter, μ. Fitted Bureau of Public Road (BPR) and conical delay functions show lower RMSPE for uninterrupted flow facilities (freeways/expressways, managed lanes) and higher values for toll roads (which might have partial interruptions due to toll booths) and signalized arterials. Akcelik function underperforms on freeways/expressways and managed lanes but shows some improvements for toll roads and superior results for the signalized arterials. This was a desired strength of Akcelik function when modeling link travel speed on facilities where stopped delays were encountered.

Keywords

Travel Demand Modeling, Congestion Functions, ITS Data Applications

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Stopher, P.R. and Fu, H.Q. (1998) Feasible Improvements to Travel-forecasting Procedure for Air Quality Analysis. Transportation Planning and Air Quality III: Emerging Strategies and Working Solutions. American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington DC
[2]	Bai, S., Nie, Y. and Niemeier, D.A. (2007) The Impact of Speed Post Processing Methods on Regional Mobile Emissions. Estimation Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 12, 307-324.
[3]	Dowling, R. and Skabardonis, A. (1993) Improving the Average Travel Speeds Estimated by Planning Models. Transportation Research Record, 1360, 68-74.
[4]	Helali, K. and Hutchinson, B. (1994) Improving Road Link Speed Estimates for Air Quality Models. Transportation Research Record, 1444, 71-77.
[5]	Transportation Research Board (1985) Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual. National Research Council, Washington DC
[6]	Spiess, H. (1990) Conical Volume-Delay Functions. Transportation Science, 24, 153-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.24.2.153
[7]	Skabardonis, A. and Dowling, R. (1997) Improved Speed-Flow Relationships for Planning Applications. Transportation Research Record, 1572, 18-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1572-03
[8]	Data Management Group (1991) Road Network Coding Manual. Joint Program in Transportation, University of Toronto, Toronto.
[9]	Taylor, M.A.P. (1997) The Effects of Lower Urban Speed Limits on Mobility, Accessibility, Energy and the Environment: Trade-Offs with Increased Safety? Final Report for the Federal Office of Road Safety, Canberra.
[10]	Tisato, P. (1991) Suggestions for an Improved Davidson Travel Time Function. Australian Road Research, 21, 85-100.
[11]	Akcelik, R. (1991) Travel Time Functions for Transport Planning Purposes: Davidson’s Function, Its Time Dependent Form and an Alternative Travel Time Function. Australian Road Research, 21, 49-59.
[12]	Singh, R. (1999) Improved Speed-Flow Relationships: Application to Transportation Planning Models. Proceedings of 7th TRB Conference Application of Transportation Planning Methods, Boston, 7-11 March 1999, 340-349.
[13]	Statewide Transportation Engineering Warehouse for Archived Regional Data (Accessed May 2012) (STEWARD). http://cce-trc-cdwserv.ce.ufl.edu/steward/
[14]	Highway Capacity Manual (2010) Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC.