d philosophically ernest: festschrift in honor of paul ernests 65th birthday. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. [46] Rowlands, S. (2009). The importance of cultivating a meta-discourse in deliberate support of metacognition, in C. B. Larson (Ed.), Metacognition: new research developments. New York: Nova. [47] Rowlands, S., & Carson, R. (2001). The contradictions in the constructivist discourse. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Newsletter, 14. http://www.ex.ac.uk/~PErnest/pome14/rowlands.htm [48] Rowlands, S. Graham, E., & Berry, J. (2010). Problems with fallibilism as a philosophy of mathematics education. Science & Education, online (and in print). [49] Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20-26. [50] Toulmin, S. (1967), The Philosophy of Science. First published in 1953. London; Hutchinson University Library. [51] Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: a way of knowing and understanding. London: Falmer. doi:10.4324/9780203454220 [52] Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Mass: Harvard University Press. [53] Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M. and Vaid, J. (1997). Conceptual structures and processes in creative thought. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith and J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: an investigation of conceptual structures and processes. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. [54] Wittgenstein, L. (1974). Tractatus logico-philosophicus, (first published, 1922). London: Routledge and Kegan. Paul. [55] Wragg, E. C. (1999). An introduction to classroom observation, London: Routledge and Falmer.

  
comments powered by Disqus
CE Subscription
E-Mail Alert
CE Most popular papers
Publication Ethics & OA Statement
CE News
Frequently Asked Questions
Recommend to Peers
Recommend to Library
Contact Us

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.