[1]
|
Betran, A.P., Merialdi, M., Lauer, J.A., et al. (2007) Rates of Cesarean Section: Analysis of Global, Regional and National Estimates. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 21, 98-113.
|
[2]
|
Brady, E., Hamilton, Joyce, A., Martin, M.P.H. and Stephanie, J., Ventura, M.A. (2012) National Vital Statistics System. Division of Vital Statistics. Births: Preliminary Data for 2012.
|
[3]
|
Cunningham, M. (2001) Gant. Caesarean Section. William’s Obstetrics. 28th Edition, 518-519.
|
[4]
|
Hallak, M. (1999) Poor Progress in Labor. High Risk Pregnancy Management Options. 2nd Edition, 1113-1114.
|
[5]
|
Kafali, H. (2003) Cesarean Breech Extraction for Impacted Fetal Head in Deep Pelvis after a Prolonged Obstructed Labor: A Cesarean Technique Variation. The Internet Journal of Gynecology & Obstetric, 2, 2.
|
[6]
|
Farah, Z., Seema, H. and Tamkin, K. (2013) Delivery of the Deeply Engaged Fetal Head during Cesarean Section in Advanced Labour: A Comparative Study of Head Pushing versus Reverse Breech Extraction. Current Pediatric Research, 17, 41-43.
|
[7]
|
Blickstein, I. (2004) Difficult Delivery of the Impacted Head during Cesarean Section.
|
[8]
|
Levy, R., Chernomoretz, T., Appleman, Z., Levin, D., Or, Y. and Hagay, Z.J. (2005) Head Pushing versus Reverse Breech Extraction in Case of Impacted Fetal Head during Cesarean Section. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 121, 24-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.09.014
|
[9]
|
Robert, L.B. (2012) Difficult Fetal Extraction at Cesarean Delivery: What Should You Do? Next Time You Face This Hazardous Scenario, Try Reverse Breech Extraction, 24, 1.
|
[10]
|
Copra, S., Bagga, R., Keepanasseril, A., Jain, V., Kalara, J. and Suri, V. (2009) Disengagement of Deeply Engaged Fetal Head during Cesarean Section in Advanced Labor: Conventional Method versus Reverse Breech. Acta of Scandinavian Obstetrics and Gynecology, 88, 1163-1166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00016340903214932
|
[11]
|
Farah, Z., Seema, H. and Tamkin, K. (2013) Delivery of the Deeply Engaged Fetal Head during Cesarean Section in Advanced Labour: A Comparative Study of Head Pushing versus Reverse Breech Extraction. Current Pediatric Research, 17, 41-43.
|
[12]
|
Dolea, C. and Abouzahr, C. (2003) Global Burden of Obstructed Labour in the Year 2000. Evidence and Information for Policy, World Health Organization, Geneva.
|
[13]
|
Chopra, S., Bagga, R., Keepanasseril, A., Jain, V., Kalra, J. and Suri, V. (2009) Disengagement of the Deeply Engaged Fetal Head during Cesarean Section in Advanced Labor: Conventional Method versus Reverse Breech Extraction. Acta of Scandinavian Obstetrics and Gynecology, 88, 1163-1166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00016340903214932
|
[14]
|
Blickstein, I. (2004) Difficult Delivery of the Impacted Fetal Head during Section: Intraoperative Disengagement Dystocia. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 32, 465-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JPM. 2004.152
|
[15]
|
Levy, R., Chemomoretz, T., Appleman, Z., Levin, D., Or, Y. and Hagay, Z.J. (2005) Head Pushing versus Reverse Breech Extraction in Cases of Impacted Fetal Head during Cesarean Section. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 121, 24-26.
|
[16]
|
Baloch, S., Khaskheli, M., Khushk, I.A. and Sheeba, A. (2008) Frequency of Second Stage Intervention and Its Outcome in Relation with Instrumental Vaginal Delivery versus Caesarean Section. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 20, 87-90.
|
[17]
|
Kaima, A.F., Abdulhakim, A.E. and Abdelrahman, H.A.-H. Reverse Breech Extraction versus Head Pushing in Cesarean Section for Obstructed Labor. Saudi Medical Journal, 32, 1261-1266.
|
[18]
|
Fasubaa, O.B., Ezechi, O.C., Orji, E.O., Ogunniyi, S.O., Akindele, S.T., Loto, O.M., et al. (2002) Delivery of the Impacted Head of the Fetus at Caesarean Section after Prolonged Obstructed Labor: A Randomised Comparative Study of Two Methods. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 22, 375-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443610220141290
|